A French Study to Evaluate the Usefulness of an Implantable Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Sensor to Improve Glycemic Control in Participants With Diabetes Mellitus
Benefits of a Long Term Implantable Continuous Glucose Monitoring System for Adults With Diabetes - France Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
239
1 country
20
Brief Summary
This study will be conducted in France and will evaluate the usefulness of using a long-term subcutaneously inserted continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor (the Eversense XL CGM System) to improve glycemic control in patients with either Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus under insulin therapy. Participants will be enrolled into one of two cohorts (Cohorts 1 and 2). Cohort 1 will be focused on participants with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes with hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) \>8%. Cohort 2 will be focused on participants with Type 1 diabetes spending more than 1.5 hours per day with mean glucose \<70 mg/dL, including excursions below 54 mg/dL, for at least 28 days. Within each cohort, participants will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to one of two groups: the Enabled and Control groups, respectively. The Enabled group will be trained to use the CGM system, whereas the Control group will continue with their usual glucose monitoring system (self-monitoring of blood glucose \[SMBG\] or flash glucose monitoring \[FGM\]).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
Started Feb 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
20 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 28, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 20, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 10, 2021
CompletedSeptember 10, 2021
August 1, 2021
2.5 years
February 2, 2018
August 13, 2021
August 13, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Cohort 1: HbA1c (%) Levels at Day 180
The analysis of the primary outcome measure for Cohort 1 was an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) comparing the HbA1c (%), defined as the percentage of hemoglobin proteins that are glycated (i.e., chemically linked to a sugar), at the Day 180 visit between the Enabled and Control arms. The statistical model included the randomization arm, center, and diabetes type as fixed classification effects, and HbA1c (%) at Day 0 as baseline covariates. Adjusted means with their 95% confidence intervals are provided.
Day 180
Cohort 2: Percentage of Time Spent in Hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) From Day 90 to Day 120
The analysis of the primary outcome measure for Cohort 2 was an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) comparing the percentage of time participants in each treatment arm spent in hypoglycemia with a blood glucose level \<54 milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL) between the Day 90 and Day 120 visits, based on the total duration of time with available CGM data (i.e., excluding temporary discontinuations). The statistical model included the randomization arm and center as fixed classification effects and the level of hypoglycemia at baseline (i.e. percentage of time spent in hypoglycemia \<54 mg/dL between the Day 0 and Day 30 visits) as baseline covariates. Adjusted means with their 95% confidence intervals are provided.
From Day 90 to Day 120
Secondary Outcomes (39)
Number of Participants With at Least One Pre-Specified Adverse Event That Occurred Following Sensor Insertion
At sensor insertion (Day 0)
Number of Participants With at Least One Pre-Specified Adverse Event That Occurred Following Sensor Removal
At sensor removal (up to Day 180)
Overall Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event
From Day 0 (Insertion) up to Day 180; for Cohort 2, Contol: From Day 0 to Day 120 and From Day 120 to Day 180
Percentage of Time Spent in the Euglycemic Range (70mg/dL-180mg/dL) From Day 90 to Day 120
From Day 90 to Day 120
Percentage of Time Spent in Hyperglycemia (>250mg/dL) From Day 90 to Day 120
From Day 90 to Day 120
- +34 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Cohort 1, Enabled - Eversense XL CGM System
EXPERIMENTALCohort 1 included patients with clinically confirmed diagnosis of Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus for ≥1 year and using insulin by multiple-daily subcutaneous injections or insulin pump and had an HbA1c \>8%. All participants had the Eversense XL Glucose Sensor subcutaneously implanted into their arm of choice. Those randomized into the Enabled group were trained and allowed to use the Eversense XL system for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). They were not allowed to use another CGM or FGM system.
Cohort 1, Control - Usual Glucose Monitoring System (SMBG or FGM)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCohort 1 included patients with clinically confirmed diagnosis of Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus for ≥1 year and using insulin by multiple-daily subcutaneous injections or insulin pump and had an HbA1c \>8%. All participants had the Eversense XL Glucose Sensor subcutaneously implanted into their arm of choice. Those randomized into the Control group were to continue using their usual glucose monitoring system (self-monitoring of blood glucose \[SMBG\] or flash glucose monitoring \[FGM\]), and the implanted Eversense XL CGM System remained in blinded mode.
Cohort 2, Enabled - Eversense XL CGM System
EXPERIMENTALCohort 2 included patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus for ≥1 year and using insulin by multiple-daily subcutaneous injections or insulin pump and spending \>1.5 hours per day with a sensor mean glucose of \<70 mg/dL for at least 28 days (time in hypoglycemia). All participants had the Eversense XL Glucose Sensor subcutaneously implanted into their arm of choice. Those randomized into the Enabled group were trained and allowed to use the Eversense XL system for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). They were not allowed to use another CGM or FGM system.
Cohort 2, Control - Usual Glucose Monitoring System (SMBG or FGM)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCohort 2 included patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus for ≥1 year and using insulin by multiple-daily subcutaneous injections or insulin pump and spending \>1.5 hours per day with a sensor mean glucose of \<70 mg/dL for at least 28 days (time in hypoglycemia). All participants had the Eversense XL Glucose Sensor subcutaneously implanted into their arm of choice. Those randomized into the Control group were to continue using their usual glucose monitoring system (self-monitoring of blood glucose \[SMBG\] or flash glucose monitoring \[FGM\]), and the implanted Eversense XL CGM System remained in blinded mode.
Interventions
The Eversense XL Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System consists of an implantable sensor inserted under the skin, an external transmitter, and a Mobile Medical Application (MMA) for display of glucose information that runs on a Handheld Device (HHD).
Commercially available products in France for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) or flash glucose monitoring (FGM) were considered as comparators for this study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female participants at least 18 years of age
- Clinically confirmed diagnosis of Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus for ≥1 year and using insulin by multiple-daily subcutaneous injections or insulin pump and an HbA1c \> 8% (Cohort 1)
- Clinically confirmed diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes mellitus for ≥1 year and using insulin by multiple-daily subcutaneous injections or insulin pump and spending more than more than 1.5 hour with sensor glucose \<70 mg/dl per day including excursions below 54 mg/dl as a mean for at least 28 days (Cohort 2)
- Participant is willing to comply with protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Female participants of childbearing capacity (defined as not surgically sterile or not menopausal for ≥ 1 year) who are lactating or pregnant, intending to become pregnant, or not practicing birth control during the course of the study
- A condition preventing or complicating the placement, operation or removal of the Sensor or wearing of transmitter, including upper extremity deformities or skin condition
- History of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV
- Currently receiving (or likely to need during the study period): immunosuppressant therapy; chemotherapy; anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy (excluding aspirin \< 2000 mg per day); antibiotics for chronic infection (e.g. osteomyelitis, endocarditis)
- A condition requiring or likely to require magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Known topical or local anesthetic allergy
- Known allergy to glucocorticoids or using systemic glucocorticoids (excluding topical, optical or nasal but including inhaled)
- Participation in another clinical investigation (drug or device) within 2 weeks prior to screening or intent to participate during the study period
- Legal incompetence or limited legal competence
- Dependency on sponsor or Investigator (e.g. co-worker or family member)
- The presence of any other active implanted device
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hoffmann-La Rochelead
- Roche Diabetes Carecollaborator
Study Sites (20)
CHU Amiens Picardie
Amiens, 80054, France
CHU Caen Normandie
Caen, 14033, France
CHU Grenoble Alpes
La Tronche, 38700, France
Hopital Hotel Dieu - Creusot
Le Creusot, 71200, France
CHRU de Lille
Lille, 59037, France
APHM - Hopital Sainte-Marguerite
Marseille, 13274, France
CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, 34295, France
Hopital Caremeau-CHU Nimes
Nîmes, 30900, France
Paris Lariboisière
Paris, 75475, France
APHP Groupe Hospitalier Cochin (Paris)
Paris, 75679, France
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69310, France
CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers, 86021, France
CHU Reims
Reims, 51092, France
CHU Rouen
Rouen, 76100, France
CHU de Nantes
Saint-Herblain, 44800, France
CHRU de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67091, France
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, 31059, France
CHU de Nancy
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511, France
Institut de diabétologie et Nutrition du Centre
Vernouillet, 28500, France
Groupe hospitalier Les Portes du Sud
Vénissieux, 69200, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Communications
- Organization
- Hoffmann-La Roche
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Cecile Berteau
Hoffmann-La Roche
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2018
First Posted
February 26, 2018
Study Start
February 28, 2018
Primary Completion
August 20, 2020
Study Completion
August 20, 2020
Last Updated
September 10, 2021
Results First Posted
September 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08