NCT04209569

Brief Summary

This study asks the research question "Does enabling families (particularly mothers and other caregivers) to 'assess and act' on drivers of malnutrition through a targeted SBC+ package succeed in a sustained reduction of risk factors thereby improving child health and nutrition?" This study aims to implement and measure the effects of a multi-level multi-sectoral behavior change information intervention in Agago District of Northern Uganda and determine potential for scale up in a complex environment. The study design is a three-arm cluster randomized controlled superiority design (cRCT) with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. The study arms will be: Group 1: NIPP arm; Group 2: NIPP+ arm; and Group 3: Non-intervention control arm. A barrier analysis will be conducted to ensure appropriate targeting and contextualization of the NIPP and NIPP+ approaches prior to implementation. Each intervention arm will receive a 12-week intervention (NIPP or NIPP+) with active monitoring and longitudinal follow ups post intervention at 2, 6, and 12-months post-intervention. The total sample size for the Barrier Analysis will be a maximum of 450 caregivers; for the main intervention, 900 households (300/arm) will be purposely sampled from the randomly selected communities. Respondents for the qualitative portion will be purposely selected.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,834

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 8, 2019

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 24, 2019

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 17, 2020

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

January 31, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

December 8, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 29, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

SBCCchild wastingaflatoxincoliformUganda

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Aflatoxin Exposure in Maize

    aflatoxin in parts per billion in a random sample of maize in a given household's maize supply

    within 1-month of harvest immediately after the intervention and one year after the intervention.

  • Change in E. coli exposure in household

    e. coli measured in colonies/100 ml

    prior to the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 1 year following the intervention

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Aflatoxin Exposure in blood serum

    immediately after the intervention, and 1 year following the intervention

  • Aflatoxin Exposure in blood serum

    immediately after the intervention, and 1 year following the intervention

  • Change in Dietary Diversity - mother and child

    prior to the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 1 year following the intervention and 2 and 6-months after the intervention

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Change in Mid-upper Arm Circumference

    prior to the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 1 year following the intervention

  • Change in Food Insecurity

    prior to the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 1 year following the intervention

  • Change in weight-for-height z score

    prior to the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 1 year following the intervention

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (3)

NIPP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The NIPP group is a standard social behavior change (SBCC) intervention that tackles a set of underlying causes of malnutrition, with the potential to have both a curative and preventative impact on child malnutrition. The approach in this group/arm involves training and pragmatic behavior change education reinforced by practical activities over a 12-week period to both men and women in selected communities. It aims to utilize easy, viable and accessible solutions within the community that can be used to improve and protect household health and nutrition. The 12-week lesson plans for the circles are divided into 3 components, i) hands-on behavior change sessions that focus on the key pre-identified causes of malnutrition to improve awareness and practice ii) micro-gardening for improved household nutrition security and iii) participatory cooking demonstrations to stimulate improvements in nutritional status and care practices.

Behavioral: Nutrition Impact and Positive Practice Circle (NIPP)

NIPP+

EXPERIMENTAL

In addition to establishing the circles and implementing the three NIPP components also implemented in the NIPP arm, those randomized to the NIPP+ arm will be provided access to innovations to allow and encourage the households and communities to translate the knowledge into positive practices. The innovations and access to vendors who sell innovations will be made available during the training to the NIPP+ volunteers who will provide trainings and access to vendors during the circle meetings. Most of the additions will be made accessible at a subsidized/low cost. The NIPP+ officers from the program will support NIPP+ volunteers in collaboration with agricultural extension officers.

Behavioral: Nutrition Impact and Positive Practice Circle (NIPP)

Control

NO INTERVENTION

No Intervention

Interventions

GOAL's NIPP approach is a gendered, grass-roots SBC approach, tackling a package of underlying behavioral determinants of malnutrition, irrespective of the particular manifestation. The approach is multi-sectoral in nature. It also has a strong monitoring, evaluation and adaptive learning component by design. The intervention approach (based on GOAL's NIPP approach) involves the creation of community, male and female circles in each community with messaging and activities targeted towards the three groups in varying intensities. While the male and female circles meet 2-3 times per week for a maximum period of 12 weeks while the community circles will meet for approximately three hours at any one time over a period of 2-7 days. (See GOAL NIPP Implementation Guidelines)

NIPPNIPP+

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female circle:
  • Willingness to participate in the group
  • staying in the area for 12 weeks.
  • Have a child under the age of 2 (irrespective of status of malnutrition)
  • Willingness to participate
  • staying the area for 12 weeks
  • Spouse, brothers and/or other influential male family members of the female caregiver enrolled in the female circle
  • Community circle - No specific criteria other than being key community leaders

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals in households without eligible children (i.e. without a child under age 2), or who will not be present in the selected communities during the intervention and data collection periods and/or who are not willing to participate through the entire 12-week cycle.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

GOAL/Uganda

Kampala, Uganda

Location

Related Publications (41)

  • Akombi BJ, Agho KE, Hall JJ, Wali N, Renzaho AMN, Merom D. Stunting, Wasting and Underweight in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;14(8):863. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080863.

    PMID: 28788108BACKGROUND
  • Bain R, Bartram J, Elliott M, Matthews R, McMahan L, Tung R, Chuang P, Gundry S. A summary catalogue of microbial drinking water tests for low and medium resource settings. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 May;9(5):1609-25. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9051609. Epub 2012 May 4.

    PMID: 22754460BACKGROUND
  • Baoua I.B., Amadou L., Ousmane B., Baributsa D. and Murdock L.L. PICS bags for post-harvest storage of maize grain in West Africa. J. Stored Prod. Res., 58 (2014), pp. 20-28

    BACKGROUND
  • Bauby, AL. and Flachenberg, F. 2014. Achieving sustainability: linking CLTS with other approaches - an example of a thorough WASH intervention in South Eastern Chad. IN: Shaw, R.J., Anh, N.V. and Dang, T.H. (eds). Sustainable water and sanitation services for all in a fast changing world: Proceedings of the 37th WEDC International Conference, Hanoi, Vietnam, 15- 19 September 2014, 5pp

    BACKGROUND
  • Channa H., Ricker-Gilbert J., De Groote H., Marenya P., Bauchet J., Woloshuk C. Assessing Kenyan farmers and traders demand for low cost moisture meters to reduce aflatoxin in maize. Research brief by Purdue University and CIMMYT Kenya.

    BACKGROUND
  • Angood C, Khara T, Dolan C, Berkley JA; WaSt Technical Interest Group. Research Priorities on the Relationship between Wasting and Stunting. PLoS One. 2016 May 9;11(5):e0153221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153221. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27159235BACKGROUND
  • Dangour AD, Watson L, Cumming O, Boisson S, Che Y, Velleman Y, Cavill S, Allen E, Uauy R. Interventions to improve water quality and supply, sanitation and hygiene practices, and their effects on the nutritional status of children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 1;2013(8):CD009382. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009382.pub2.

    PMID: 23904195BACKGROUND
  • Danso J.K., Osekre E.A., Opit G.P., Manu N., Armstrong P., Arthur F.H., Campbell J.F., Mbata G., and McNeill S.G. Post-harvest insect infestation and mycotoxin levels in maize markets in the Middle Belt of Ghana Journal of Stored Products Research 77 (2018) 9-15

    BACKGROUND
  • Davis Jr., Thomas P. Barrier Analysis Facilitator's Guide: A Tool for Improving Behavior Change Communication in Child Survival and Community Development Programs, Washington, D.C.: Food for the Hungry. (2004).

    BACKGROUND
  • ENN. Child wasting and stunting: time to overcome the separation. A Briefing Note for policy makers and programme implementers. Emergency Nutrition Network. June 2018.

    BACKGROUND
  • FTF NIL Africa 2013. Baseline Report. Assessing the linkage between agriculture, food security, nutrition and health among women and children in rural Ugandan households. 66 pages. www.nutritioninnovationlab.org

    BACKGROUND
  • GOAL. 2016. "Implementation guidelines for Nutrition Impact and Positive Practice (NIPP) approach." GOAL, Ireland

    BACKGROUND
  • Hamoudi A, Jeuland M, Lombardo S, Patil S, Pattanayak SK, Rai S. The effect of water quality testing on household behavior: evidence from an experiment in rural India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Jul;87(1):18-22. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0051.

    PMID: 22764286BACKGROUND
  • Harding KL, Aguayo VM, Webb P. Factors associated with wasting among children under five years old in South Asia: Implications for action. PLoS One. 2018 Jul 3;13(7):e0198749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198749. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 29969457BACKGROUND
  • Headey D, Nguyen P, Kim S, Rawat R, Ruel M, Menon P. Is Exposure to Animal Feces Harmful to Child Nutrition and Health Outcomes? A Multicountry Observational Analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Apr;96(4):961-969. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0270. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

    PMID: 27994099BACKGROUND
  • Khara T, Dolan C. The relationship between wasting and stunting, policy, programming and research implications. Technical Briefing paper. Oxford, UK: Emergency Nutrition Network, 2014. 2.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kikafunda JK, Walker AF, Collett D, Tumwine JK. Risk factors for early childhood malnutrition in Uganda. Pediatrics. 1998 Oct;102(4):E45. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.4.e45.

    PMID: 9755282BACKGROUND
  • Korich DG, Mead JR, Madore MS, Sinclair NA, Sterling CR. Effects of ozone, chlorine dioxide, chlorine, and monochloramine on Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst viability. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 May;56(5):1423-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.5.1423-1428.1990.

    PMID: 2339894BACKGROUND
  • Kosinski KC, Kulinkina AV, Abrah AF, Adjei MN, Breen KM, Chaudhry HM, Nevin PE, Warner SH, Tendulkar SA. A mixed-methods approach to understanding water use and water infrastructure in a schistosomiasis-endemic community: case study of Asamama, Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 14;16:322. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2976-2.

    PMID: 27076042BACKGROUND
  • Lauer JM, Duggan CP, Ausman LM, Griffiths JK, Webb P, Agaba E, Nshakira N, Tran HQ, Gewirtz AT, Ghosh S. Biomarkers of maternal environmental enteric dysfunction are associated with shorter gestation and reduced length in newborn infants in Uganda. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Oct 1;108(4):889-896. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy176.

    PMID: 30247538BACKGROUND
  • Lauer JM, Duggan CP, Ausman LM, Griffiths JK, Webb P, Bashaasha B, Agaba E, Turyashemererwa FM, Ghosh S. Unsafe Drinking Water Is Associated with Environmental Enteric Dysfunction and Poor Growth Outcomes in Young Children in Rural Southwestern Uganda. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Dec;99(6):1606-1612. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0143.

    PMID: 30350765BACKGROUND
  • Lauer JM, Duggan CP, Ausman LM, Griffiths JK, Webb P, Wang JS, Xue KS, Agaba E, Nshakira N, Ghosh S. Maternal aflatoxin exposure during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes in Uganda. Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Apr;15(2):e12701. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12701. Epub 2018 Oct 23.

    PMID: 30242967BACKGROUND
  • Luby SP, Rahman M, Arnold BF, Unicomb L, Ashraf S, Winch PJ, Stewart CP, Begum F, Hussain F, Benjamin-Chung J, Leontsini E, Naser AM, Parvez SM, Hubbard AE, Lin A, Nizame FA, Jannat K, Ercumen A, Ram PK, Das KK, Abedin J, Clasen TF, Dewey KG, Fernald LC, Null C, Ahmed T, Colford JM Jr. Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Bangladesh: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Mar;6(3):e302-e315. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30490-4. Epub 2018 Jan 29.

    PMID: 29396217BACKGROUND
  • Marshak A, Young H, Bontrager EN, Boyd EM. The Relationship Between Acute Malnutrition, Hygiene Practices, Water and Livestock, and Their Program Implications in Eastern Chad. Food Nutr Bull. 2017 Mar;38(1):115-127. doi: 10.1177/0379572116681682. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

    PMID: 27932595BACKGROUND
  • Marshak, A., H. Young, and A. Radday, Water, Livestock, and Malnutrition: Findings from an Impact Assessment of 'Community Resilience to Acute Malnutrition' Programming in the Dar Sila Region of Eastern Chad, 2012-2015. 2016, Feinstein International Center, Tufts University: Medford, MA.

    BACKGROUND
  • Marshak, A., Mazurana, D., Opio, J., Gordon, R., and T. Atim. Tracking change in livelihoods, service delivery, and governance: evidence form a 2013-2015 panel survey in Uganda. ODI Working paper 59. September 2017.

    BACKGROUND
  • Martorell R, Young MF. Patterns of stunting and wasting: potential explanatory factors. Adv Nutr. 2012 Mar 1;3(2):227-33. doi: 10.3945/an.111.001107.

    PMID: 22516733BACKGROUND
  • Masset E, Haddad L, Cornelius A, Isaza-Castro J. Effectiveness of agricultural interventions that aim to improve nutritional status of children: systematic review. BMJ. 2012 Jan 17;344:d8222. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d8222.

    PMID: 22251864BACKGROUND
  • Murdock L.L., Margam V., Baoua I., Balfe S., and Shade R.E. Death by desiccation: effects of hermetic storage on cowpea bruchids. J. Stored Prod. Res., 49 (2012), pp. 166-170

    BACKGROUND
  • Omotilewa OJ, Ricker-Gilbert J, Ainembabazi JH, Shively GE. Does improved storage technology promote modern input use and food security? Evidence from a randomized trial in Uganda. J Dev Econ. 2018 Nov;135:176-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.07.006.

    PMID: 31007346BACKGROUND
  • Rogers, Beatrice; Sanchez, Leslie; and Feinstein, Jamie. 2016. Sustaining Development: Results from a Study of Sustainability and Exit Strategies among Development Food Assistance Projects-Honduras Country Study. Washington, DC: FHI 360/Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA).

    BACKGROUND
  • Ruel M.T., Quisumbing A.R. and Balagamwalab M. Nutrition-sensitive agriculture: What have we learned so far? Global Food Security 17 (2018) 128-153

    BACKGROUND
  • Schoenbuchner SM, Dolan C, Mwangome M, Hall A, Richard SA, Wells JC, Khara T, Sonko B, Prentice AM, Moore SE. The relationship between wasting and stunting: a retrospective cohort analysis of longitudinal data in Gambian children from 1976 to 2016. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Aug 1;110(2):498-507. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy326.

    PMID: 30753251BACKGROUND
  • Stobaugh HC, Rogers BL, Rosenberg IH, Webb P, Maleta KM, Manary MJ, Trehan I. Children with Poor Linear Growth Are at Risk for Repeated Relapse to Wasting after Recovery from Moderate Acute Malnutrition. J Nutr. 2018 Jun 1;148(6):974-979. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy033.

    PMID: 29726948BACKGROUND
  • Stobaugh HC, Rogers BL, Webb P, Rosenberg IH, Thakwalakwa C, Maleta KM, Trehan I, Manary MJ. Household-level factors associated with relapse following discharge from treatment for moderate acute malnutrition. Br J Nutr. 2018 May;119(9):1039-1046. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518000363. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

    PMID: 29502542BACKGROUND
  • Vella V, Tomkins A, Nviku J, Marshall T. Determinants of nutritional status in south-west Uganda. J Trop Pediatr. 1995 Apr;41(2):89-98. doi: 10.1093/tropej/41.2.89.

    PMID: 7776404BACKGROUND
  • Vetter TR, Mascha EJ. Defining the Primary Outcomes and Justifying Secondary Outcomes of a Study: Usually, the Fewer, the Better. Anesth Analg. 2017 Aug;125(2):678-681. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002224.

    PMID: 28682958BACKGROUND
  • Wilson, T. 2007. Perceptions, practices, principles and policies in provision of livestock-water in Africa. Agricultural Water Management, 90 (2007), pp. 1-12

    BACKGROUND
  • Young H., Marshak A. Persistent Global Acute Malnutrition. A discussion paper on the scope of the problem, its drivers and recommendations for policy, practice and research. USA: Feinstein International Center, Tufts University, 2018.

    BACKGROUND
  • Srinivasan B, Ghosh S, Webb P, Griswold SP, Xue KS, Wang JS, Mehta S. Assessing an aflatoxin exposure biomarker: Exploring the interchangeability and correlation between venous and capillary blood samples. Environ Res. 2022 Dec;215(Pt 2):114396. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114396. Epub 2022 Sep 23.

  • Griswold SP, Marshak A, Fitzpatrick M, Lantagne D, Shoenmakers K, Hebie M, Radday A, De Groote H, Mehta S, Gottlieb G, Webb P, Ghosh S. The One Nutrition in Complex Environments (ONCE) study protocol: a cluster-randomized multi-level multi-sectoral intervention to improve nutrition in Uganda. Trials. 2022 Apr 1;23(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06170-7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

MalnutritionWaterborne Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Nutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesInfections

Study Officials

  • Stacy P Griswold, MS

    Tufts University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study design is a three-arm cluster randomized controlled superiority design (cRCT) with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio. The study arms will be: Group 1: NIPP arm; Group 2: NIPP+ arm; and Group 3: Non-intervention control arm. for the venous aflatoxin sub-study, 36 women will be purposively selected from the eligible communities.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2019

First Posted

December 24, 2019

Study Start

January 17, 2020

Primary Completion

December 30, 2022

Study Completion

December 30, 2022

Last Updated

January 31, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

This is undecided, presently

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
The data will be made available via USAID Data Development Library after the first paper has been published.
Access Criteria
Data will be available to the public via the Data Development Library.

Locations