NCT04163744

Brief Summary

The goal of induction of labor is to achieve vaginal delivery by stimulating uterine contractions before the spontaneous onset of labor. Generally, induction of labor has merit as a therapeutic option when the benefits of expeditious delivery outweigh the risks of continuing the pregnancy. The first part of this process is called cervical ripening. The goal is to facilitate the process of cervical softening, thinning, and dilating with resultant reduction in the rate of failed induction and induction to delivery time. Cervical remodeling is a critical component of normal parturition. Effective methods for cervical ripening include the use of mechanical and pharmacological methods. There are many induction methods: pharmacological and mechanical. Nowadays, induction of labour is one of the most frequent obstetric interventions, performed in 25% of pregnancies. Generally, better maternal and neonatal outcomes are achieved if the risks of continuing pregnancy outweigh the benefits. Cervical ripening is the first part of the induction process, which consists in relaxing and softening the uterine cervix prior to the onset of uterine dynamics. For this purpose, there are available pharmacological (mainly prostaglandin) and mechanical methods (including the balloon probes: Foley catheter or double cervical balloon). Despite being equally effective in vaginal delivery and caesarean section rate, there has been registered an increased risk of uterine hyperdynamic with the use of prostaglandin in contrast to the use of balloon probes, which may lead to an increased risk of fetal distress. Concerning balloon probes, various published studies conclude that it is an effective and safe cervical ripening method, without increasing the risk of maternal infection (chorioamnionitis / endometritis) or neonatal infection. The use of balloon probes could be established as first-choice method of induction of labour, reducing the risk of uterine hyperdynamic and the likelihood of intrauterine fetal distress derived from the use of prostaglandin. The balloon probe safety makes it an ideal method for performing cervical ripening at home (out-patient) in low-risk pregnancies, increasing the satisfaction of women who desire it and reducing the economic cost for the hospital. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of double balloon catheter (CRB-Cook®) in induction of labour. The main objective is to provide evidence that there are no differences in caesarean section rate between induction of labour performed with Cook double balloon catheter in out-patient and in-patient compared with a cohort of induction of labour with pharmacological methods (dinoprostone and misoprostol). Two clinical studies will be carried out for this purpose:

  1. 1.Prospective cohort observational study
  2. 2.Historical case-control study

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 10, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 12, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 15, 2019

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 2, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

November 15, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 12, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 12, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Induction of labourDouble balloon catheterVaginal delivery rateMechanical methodin-patientout-patient

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Effectiveness Vaginal delivery / caesarean section rate

    Measure vaginal delivery and caesarean rate of induction of labour with double balloon catheter

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Safety of patient and foetus

    12 months

  • Patients satisfaction

    12 months

Interventions

Induction of labour with double balloon catheter

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Pregnant women

You may qualify if:

  • Pregnant women
  • Age: ≧ 18 years
  • Ability to read and understand informed consent
  • Unique or multiple pregnancies (monochorionic or dichorionic twins)
  • ≧37 weeks of pregnancy
  • Unfavourable cervix (Bishop test: \< 7)

You may not qualify if:

  • \>2 foetus pregnancies
  • \< 37 or ≧42 weeks of pregnancy
  • Prelabour rupture of membranes
  • Vaginal delivery contraindication
  • Placenta previa (occlusive and not occlusive)
  • Vasa previa
  • Transverse or oblique lie
  • Umbilical cord procubitus or prolapse
  • Corporal uterine surgery with entrance into the uterine cavity
  • Antecedent of ≧ 2 caesarean section
  • Antecedent of inverted T caesarean section
  • Antecedent of uterine rupture
  • Active genital herpes infection
  • Cervical carcinoma
  • Severe maternal pathology
  • +13 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Barcelona, 08025, Spain

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • WHO recommendations: Induction of labour at or beyond term. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535795/

  • Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK, Wen SW, Walker M, Gao Y, Tang Y. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG. 2016 Feb;123(3):346-54. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13456. Epub 2015 Nov 5.

  • Ten Eikelder ML, Mast K, van der Velden A, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BW. Induction of Labor Using a Foley Catheter or Misoprostol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016 Oct;71(10):620-630. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000361.

  • Diederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol B. Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1086-1095. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15047. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

  • Vaknin Z, Kurzweil Y, Sherman D. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;203(5):418-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.038.

  • McMaster K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Evaluation of a Transcervical Foley Catheter as a Source of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):539-551. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001002.

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Elisa Llurba, MD, PhD

    Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Elisa Llurba, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2019

First Posted

November 15, 2019

Study Start

October 10, 2019

Primary Completion

November 1, 2020

Study Completion

February 2, 2021

Last Updated

November 15, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11

Locations