Effectiveness and Safety of Induction of Labour Using a Double Balloon Catheter (INDOBA)
INDOBA
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of induction of labor is to achieve vaginal delivery by stimulating uterine contractions before the spontaneous onset of labor. Generally, induction of labor has merit as a therapeutic option when the benefits of expeditious delivery outweigh the risks of continuing the pregnancy. The first part of this process is called cervical ripening. The goal is to facilitate the process of cervical softening, thinning, and dilating with resultant reduction in the rate of failed induction and induction to delivery time. Cervical remodeling is a critical component of normal parturition. Effective methods for cervical ripening include the use of mechanical and pharmacological methods. There are many induction methods: pharmacological and mechanical. Nowadays, induction of labour is one of the most frequent obstetric interventions, performed in 25% of pregnancies. Generally, better maternal and neonatal outcomes are achieved if the risks of continuing pregnancy outweigh the benefits. Cervical ripening is the first part of the induction process, which consists in relaxing and softening the uterine cervix prior to the onset of uterine dynamics. For this purpose, there are available pharmacological (mainly prostaglandin) and mechanical methods (including the balloon probes: Foley catheter or double cervical balloon). Despite being equally effective in vaginal delivery and caesarean section rate, there has been registered an increased risk of uterine hyperdynamic with the use of prostaglandin in contrast to the use of balloon probes, which may lead to an increased risk of fetal distress. Concerning balloon probes, various published studies conclude that it is an effective and safe cervical ripening method, without increasing the risk of maternal infection (chorioamnionitis / endometritis) or neonatal infection. The use of balloon probes could be established as first-choice method of induction of labour, reducing the risk of uterine hyperdynamic and the likelihood of intrauterine fetal distress derived from the use of prostaglandin. The balloon probe safety makes it an ideal method for performing cervical ripening at home (out-patient) in low-risk pregnancies, increasing the satisfaction of women who desire it and reducing the economic cost for the hospital. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of double balloon catheter (CRB-Cook®) in induction of labour. The main objective is to provide evidence that there are no differences in caesarean section rate between induction of labour performed with Cook double balloon catheter in out-patient and in-patient compared with a cohort of induction of labour with pharmacological methods (dinoprostone and misoprostol). Two clinical studies will be carried out for this purpose:
- 1.Prospective cohort observational study
- 2.Historical case-control study
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 2, 2021
CompletedNovember 15, 2019
November 1, 2019
1.1 years
November 12, 2019
November 12, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effectiveness Vaginal delivery / caesarean section rate
Measure vaginal delivery and caesarean rate of induction of labour with double balloon catheter
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Safety of patient and foetus
12 months
Patients satisfaction
12 months
Interventions
Induction of labour with double balloon catheter
Eligibility Criteria
Pregnant women
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant women
- Age: ≧ 18 years
- Ability to read and understand informed consent
- Unique or multiple pregnancies (monochorionic or dichorionic twins)
- ≧37 weeks of pregnancy
- Unfavourable cervix (Bishop test: \< 7)
You may not qualify if:
- \>2 foetus pregnancies
- \< 37 or ≧42 weeks of pregnancy
- Prelabour rupture of membranes
- Vaginal delivery contraindication
- Placenta previa (occlusive and not occlusive)
- Vasa previa
- Transverse or oblique lie
- Umbilical cord procubitus or prolapse
- Corporal uterine surgery with entrance into the uterine cavity
- Antecedent of ≧ 2 caesarean section
- Antecedent of inverted T caesarean section
- Antecedent of uterine rupture
- Active genital herpes infection
- Cervical carcinoma
- Severe maternal pathology
- +13 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025, Spain
Related Publications (6)
WHO recommendations: Induction of labour at or beyond term. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535795/
PMID: 30629393RESULTChen W, Xue J, Peprah MK, Wen SW, Walker M, Gao Y, Tang Y. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG. 2016 Feb;123(3):346-54. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13456. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
PMID: 26538408RESULTTen Eikelder ML, Mast K, van der Velden A, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BW. Induction of Labor Using a Foley Catheter or Misoprostol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016 Oct;71(10):620-630. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000361.
PMID: 27770132RESULTDiederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol B. Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1086-1095. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15047. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
PMID: 29211328RESULTVaknin Z, Kurzweil Y, Sherman D. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;203(5):418-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.038.
PMID: 20605133RESULTMcMaster K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Evaluation of a Transcervical Foley Catheter as a Source of Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):539-551. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001002.
PMID: 26244535RESULT
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elisa Llurba, MD, PhD
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2019
First Posted
November 15, 2019
Study Start
October 10, 2019
Primary Completion
November 1, 2020
Study Completion
February 2, 2021
Last Updated
November 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11