To Study the Efficacy and Safety of Misoprostol by Sublingual Routes for Induction of Labour
SL-IOL
Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor for Primigravida at 41 or More Weeks of Pregnancy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research is to compare the efficacy and the safety of sublingual misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol administration for the induction of labour for primigravida at 41 or more weeks of pregnancy. In routine practice, misoprostol 25µg is used by per vaginal route for the induction of labour in Bhutan. The misoprostol dose is given repeatedly every 4 hours to a maximum of 6 dosages. The per vaginal route is found to be very effective and safe for the induction of labour. But, patient compliance is poor and increasing the risk of neonatal sepsis since it has to be inserted into vagina every 4 hours. To overcome these problems with per vaginal route, this study is developed to explore the efficacy and safety of misoprostol use by sublingual routes for the induction of labour. Misoprostol can be used by sublingual, oral or per vaginal route as per the findings of the other studies. If the finding of this study proves sublingual use of misoprostol is safe and efficient for the induction of labour, the current practice of using misoprostol by vaginal route will be changed to sublingual route in Bhutan.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2021
CompletedMay 17, 2021
May 1, 2021
6 months
May 4, 2021
May 13, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To measure the number of pregnant mothers who have a vaginal delivery within 24 hours of the induction.
The number of successful vaginal deliveries will be recorded and compared between the study arms. This is to study the overall efficacy of sublingual use of misoprostol in compared between the study group
The numbers of successful vaginal delivery conducted in each group will be measured for 6 months.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
To compare the dosages of misoprostol required for induction of labour in the study arms.
The total number of repeat dosages of misoprostol use in the each study participant will be determined for 24 hours.
The modes of delivery will be compared between the study arms
The individual modes of delivery will be documented for 24-48 hours
To compare the induction to delivery interval between the study group
The time taken from the starting of the induction to the time at delivery will be measured for individual study participant for 24 - 48 hours.
Study Arms (2)
Sublingual misoprostol
EXPERIMENTALSublingual misoprostol group will receive misoprostol 25µg by sublingual routes; the dose will be given repeatedly every 4 hours by sublingual route till there is labour pain or contraction or to a maximum of 6 dosages.
Vaginal misoprostol
EXPERIMENTALVaginal misoprostol group will receive misoprostol 25µg by per vaginal routes; the dose will be given repeatedly every 4 hours by per vaginal route till there is labour pain or contraction or to a maximum of 6 dosages.
Interventions
Misoprostol 25µg will be used for both the study arms
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 or more years
- Primigravida
- Singleton pregnancy
- Gestation at 41 or more weeks of pregnancy
- Estimated fetal weight of \<4000 gram
- In cephalic presentation
- Bishop score \< 6 (unfavorable cervix)
- Reassuring fetal heart rate tracing
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 years
- Multiple pregnancy (twin, triplet and higher order pregnancies)
- Gestation \<41 weeks of pregnancy
- Fetal macrosomia (Estimated fetal weight \>4000 gram)
- Cephalo-pelvic disproportion
- Malpresentation (breech, oblique, transverse)
- Bishop score \>6 (favorable cervix)
- Presence of labor or uterine contractions
- Non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracing
- Pregnant women with known allergy to misoprostol,
- Previous Caesarean delivery or other uterine surgery
- Previous uterine rupture
- Placenta previa
- Chorioamnionitis
- Prelabour rupture of membrane (PROM)
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Phuentsholing Hospital
Phuentsholing, 21002, Bhutan
Related Publications (3)
Teixeira C, Lunet N, Rodrigues T, Barros H. The Bishop Score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Sep;286(3):739-53. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2341-3. Epub 2012 May 1.
PMID: 22546948BACKGROUNDBatinelli L, Serafini A, Nante N, Petraglia F, Severi FM, Messina G. Induction of labour: clinical predictive factors for success and failure. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Apr;38(3):352-358. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1361388. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
PMID: 29058493BACKGROUNDMozurkewich EL, Chilimigras JL, Berman DR, Perni UC, Romero VC, King VJ, Keeton KL. Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Oct 27;11:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-84.
PMID: 22032440BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yeshey Dorjey
Ministry of Health, Phuentsholing Hospital, Chukha, Bhutan
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The participants and the investigators will not be masked; however, outcome assessor (statisticians) will be masked because they will not know anything about the drugs received by sublingual or per vaginal routes as their role will be to analyze the outcome only.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2021
First Posted
May 14, 2021
Study Start
June 1, 2021
Primary Completion
November 30, 2021
Study Completion
November 30, 2021
Last Updated
May 17, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
I will decide later and provide updates here