Misoprostol Labour Induction Study
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral Misoprostol, Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol and Vaginal Dinoprostone for Induction of Labour
2 other identifiers
interventional
511
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Labour induction is a frequent obstetric intervention (\~20%). Prostaglandins (PGs) are effective agents, but gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance has limited use to non-oral routes. The traditional oxytocin "drip" requires intravenous (IV) use and discourages mobility. Misoprostol, a PG analogue, is marketed for oral treatment of GI disorders, but initiates uterine contraction, an undesirable GI side effect. Recently, there has been a research "boom" on vaginal misoprostol use in pregnancy to induce term labour drawing on this "side effect:". The principal investigator has led one of three groups worldwide which has published on oral misoprostol to study effectiveness, GI tolerance, and safety for mother/baby in term labour induction. Cost per patient has been less then one percent that of other PGs, even less than IV oxytocin.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Apr 1999
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 1999
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2000
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2000
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2018
CompletedApril 6, 2018
April 1, 2018
1.7 years
March 6, 2018
April 4, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time interval from induction (at randomization) to vaginal birth
The chosen clinically important difference: 4 hours (240 minutes) difference. Caesarean sections could not be included in this planned parametric analysis (ANOVA) comparison of means
Randomization to newborn vaginal birth, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Time interval from induction (at randomization) to birth
Randomization to newborn birth, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Profound newborn acidemia
Cord blood gas sample collected at birth
Newborn respiratory depression
Assessed at 5 minutes after birth
Newborn birth asphyxia
Birth to newborn hospital discharge, assessed up to 10 weeks
Newborn severe metabolic acidemia
Cord blood gas sample collected at birth
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (6)
Vaginal birth in less than 24 hours
Randomization to newborn birth, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
Time interval from randomization to full dilation
Randomization to newborn birth, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
First stage of labor duration
Randomization to newborn birth, assessed through to study completion, up to 10 weeks
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Oral Misoprostol
EXPERIMENTAL50ug po q4h orally, as needed
Low dose vaginal misoprostol
EXPERIMENTAL25-50ug q6h, vaginally, as needed
Usual vaginal dinoprostone
EXPERIMENTAL1-2mg q6h, vaginally as needed
Interventions
Prostaglandin E1 - 100ug tablet, divided in half by pharmacy staff to be administered by mouth.
Prostaglandin E1 - 100ug oral tablet, divided in quarters by pharmacy staff, vaginal placement of one or two quarters as needed every 6 hours
Prostaglandin E2 - 1-2mg gel manufactured for vaginal use; placed vaginally every 6 hours as needed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- pregnant women
- gestational age 37 weeks or more based on ultrasound before 24 weeks
- live single fetus in cephalic presentation
- indication for induction of labour
You may not qualify if:
- non reassuring fetal heart rate tracing
- maternal prior uterine surgery
- known hypersensitivity to misoprostol or other prostaglandin
- contraindication to vaginal birth
- fetal anomaly identified on antenatal ultrasound
- uncontrolled maternal asthma or epilepsy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- David Younglead
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David C Young, MD MSc FRCSC
IWK Health Centre
- STUDY DIRECTOR
B A Armson, MD MSc FRCSC
IWK Health Centre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Group assignment will be concealed until time induction is to begin, when randomization will occur. No attempt will be made at formal blinding of caregivers following concealed randomization, although neonatal assessment will be carried out by a team unaware of study group assignment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Active Staff Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2018
First Posted
April 6, 2018
Study Start
April 1, 1999
Primary Completion
December 1, 2000
Study Completion
December 1, 2000
Last Updated
April 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
no sharing plan is in place