Propess Versus Prostin for Induction of Labour in Women With Term PROM
PESTIBOR
Labour Induction With the Propess Vaginal Delivery System vs. Labour Induction With the Prostin Vaginal Tablet in Case of a Prelabour Rupture of Membranes. PESTIBOR Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
526
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term is a rupture that occurs at term (\> 37 weeks) before the start of labor. The purpose of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of two agents used in induction of labor in women with term PROM Propess (Controlled release dinoprostone, Vaginal Delivery System) and Prostin E2 (Dinoprostone vaginal Tablet). Women will be randomised to two treatment groups. Although some studies support efficacy of the Propess for cervical ripening at term in induction of labor with intact membranes, it has not been well studied in women with PROM at term.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Mar 2021
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2023
CompletedFebruary 15, 2021
February 1, 2021
1.8 years
January 26, 2021
February 9, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Induction to Delivery Interval
24 hours
Induction to Onset of labor Interval
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Frequency of Cesarean Sections
24 hours
Frequency of Failed Induction
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Propess Vaginal Delivery System
ACTIVE COMPARATORPropess - Prostaglandin E2 Vaginal Delivery System. Slow intravaginal release of 10 mg dinoprostone at a rate of 0.3 mg/h.
Prostin Tablet
ACTIVE COMPARATORProstaglandin E2 Vaginal Tablet 3 mg dinoprostone
Interventions
Propess - The vaginal insert is removed 24 h after the application. It is only to be removed earlier in case of the onset of active labour or at the occurrence of hyperstimulation.
Prostin - 3 mg vaginal tablet is placed in the posterior vaginal fornix. Dose can be repeated every 8 hours till onset of active labour or the occurrence of hyper-stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Gestational age 37 weeks or more
- Singleton pregnancy
- Cephalic presentation
- Unfavorable cervix (BISHOP \<6)
- No contraindications for vaginal delivery
- Without uterine surgery
- Without chorioamnionitis
You may not qualify if:
- Age less than 18 years
- Multiple gestation
- Previous cesarean section
- Suspected intraamniotic infection
- Any contraindication to vaginal delivery
- Bishop score \>7
- Pathological ctg
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (12)
Mynarek M, Bjellmo S, Lydersen S, Strand KM, Afset JE, Andersen GL, Vik T. Prelabor rupture of membranes and the association with cerebral palsy in term born children: a national registry-based cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2751-3.
PMID: 32005186BACKGROUNDNational Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and Their Babies During Childbirth. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK) Copyright (c) 2014 National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health.; 2014
BACKGROUNDHannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Myhr TL, Wang EE, Weston JA, Willan AR. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996 Apr 18;334(16):1005-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199604183341601.
PMID: 8598837BACKGROUNDZlatnik FJ. Management of premature rupture of membranes at term. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1992 Jun;19(2):353-64.
PMID: 1630743BACKGROUNDGeethanath RM, Ahmed I, Abu-Harb M, Onwuneme C, McGarry K, Hinshaw K. Intrapartum antibiotics for prolonged rupture of membranes at term to prevent Group B Streptococcal sepsis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Jul;39(5):619-622. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1550474. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
PMID: 30917724BACKGROUNDIvars J, Garabedian C, Devos P, Therby D, Carlier S, Deruelle P, Subtil D. Simplified Bishop score including parity predicts successful induction of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Aug;203:309-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
PMID: 27423032BACKGROUNDAthiel Y, Crequit S, Bongiorno M, Sanyan S, Renevier B. Term prelabor rupture of membranes: Foley catheter versus dinoprostone as ripening agent. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Oct;49(8):101834. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101834. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
PMID: 32585393BACKGROUNDFreret TS, Chacon KM, Bryant AS, Kaimal AJ, Clapp MA. Oxytocin Compared to Buccal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor after Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes. Am J Perinatol. 2021 Feb;38(3):224-230. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1696642. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
PMID: 31491801BACKGROUNDCheung PC, Yeo EL, Wong KS, Tang LC. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: a randomized control trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(9):1128-33. doi: 10.1080/00016340600589636.
PMID: 16929421BACKGROUNDHu YP, Zhou D, Li M, Wang Y, Wang L, Sun GQ, Xiao M. Use of labor induction with dinoprostone vaginal suppositories in pregnant women with gestational hypertension. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Nov;45(11):2185-2192. doi: 10.1111/jog.14092. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
PMID: 31456315BACKGROUNDShirley M. Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert: A Review in Cervical Ripening. Drugs. 2018 Oct;78(15):1615-1624. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0995-2.
PMID: 30317521BACKGROUNDPajntar M, Lučovnik M. Normalni porod in vodenje poroda. v knjigi Nosečnost in vodenje poroda. Ured. Pajntar M, Novak Antolič Ž, Lučovnik M. Medicinski razgledi 2015. Tretja dopolnjena izdaja. 231-50.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Veronika Anzeljc
Maribor University Medical Centre
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2021
First Posted
February 8, 2021
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 1, 2023
Study Completion
January 1, 2023
Last Updated
February 15, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share