Double Balloon Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Cervical Ripening.
1 other identifier
interventional
210
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare the efficacy of transcervical double balloon catheters versus controlled release dinoprostone vaginal inserts for pre-induction cervical ripening in term women with unfavourable cervices.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jun 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedDecember 13, 2011
December 1, 2011
1.3 years
July 23, 2010
December 9, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Vaginal delivery within 24 hours
24 hours from start of cervical ripening
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Cesarean section rate
48 hours from start of ripening
Onset of active labor
36 hours from start of ripening
Uterine hyperstimulation
12 hours (double ballon catheter arm) and 24 hours (dinoprostone vaginal insert arm) from start of ripening
Study Arms (2)
Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert
ACTIVE COMPARATORDouble Balloon Catheter
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The balloons either side of the cervix are inflated with 50 ml of water. The catheter is removed after 12 hours if spontaneous expulsion has not occurred.
Vaginal insert is placed in the posterior vaginal fornix for a maximum period of 24 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- singleton gestation
- gestational age greater than 34 weeks
- cephalic presentation
- intact membranes
- Bishop score of ≤4
- reactive fetal heart rate (FHR) pattern on admission
You may not qualify if:
- any condition precluding vaginal delivery
- any contraindication to receiving prostaglandins, including history of asthma, glaucoma, or cardiac or cardiovascular disease
- previous cesarean section or other uterine incision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Del Ponte Hospital
Varese, 21100, Italy
Related Publications (1)
de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.
PMID: 36996264DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2010
First Posted
July 27, 2010
Study Start
June 1, 2010
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
December 13, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-12