Innovative Brain Stimulation for Induction of Learning Plasticity
Effects of rTMS on Brain Plasticity and Motor Learning in Healthy People.
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Recent studies have identified new neurobiological biomarker (i.e. functional connectivity of the parietal cortex) of motor learning among healthy people. This enables to refine our current model of motor learning wherein specific cortical processes are key factors for motor acquisition. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that new technical approaches such as repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can efficiently influence this key factor. However, up to now, no rTMS studies have target this new biomarker. Therefore, the effect of rTMS are unknown. Hence, the investigators want to develop a new rTMS setup able to induce specific brain processes in healthy individuals that are likely to benefit. This has the potential to obtain critical information in order to improve treatment of motor re-learning in patients with neurological diseases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy
Started Oct 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 24, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 29, 2019
October 1, 2019
4 months
October 24, 2019
October 25, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Motor performance in consolidation test
Difference in error rate and speed improvement in active and sham groups (learned task)
after training (Day 3)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Resting state EEG connectivity in active and sham groups
Before (Day 1) and after training (Day 2)
Motor Evoked Potential (MEPs) Amplitudes (peak to peak)
Before (Day 1) and after training (Day 2)
Other Outcomes (2)
Motor performance in retention test
After training (Day 2)
Motor performance in transfer test
after training (Day 2 and Day 3)
Study Arms (2)
Intermittent theta burst stimulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORVolunteers will be submitted to non-invasive parietal stimulation before a mirror drawing task. A transcranial magnetic stimulator (MagPro X100, Medtronic Functional Diagnostics, Skovlunde, Denmark) will deliver interrmittent bursts of bipolar magnetic pulses exerting an excitation on the underlying brain tissue (iTBS). The stimulation coil will be placed over the parietal cortex. Stimulation consisted of a burst of three pulses administered at 50Hz, repeated at a frequency of 5Hz, delivered in 2 s trains followed by an 8 s interval for a total of 600 pulses12. Stimulation intensity was set at 70% of RMT. Each session will consist of two spaced neuronavigated iTBS applications, separated by 15 minutes.
Sham intermittent theta burst stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORFor sham iTBS, the protocol is the same, except the sham coil produces no magnetic field.
Interventions
Participants will participate in 1 session of neuronavigated (TMS Navigator, Localite, Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757, Sankt Augustin, Germany ) iTBS (patterned form of TMS) coupled with motor learning.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- man or woman aged between 18-40 years,
- ability to give informed consent,
- ability to follow protocol instructions,
- normal or corrected-to-normal vision,
You may not qualify if:
- history of epileptic seizure (ci. TMS),
- skull breach (ci. TMS),
- metallic object in the brain (ci. TMS),
- pacemaker (ci. TMS),
- severe co-morbidity (ex, traumatic, rheumatologic, neurodegenerative diseases),
- pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pierre Nicolo
Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Adrian Guggisberg, Prof. Dr.
University Hospital, Geneva
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 24, 2019
First Posted
October 28, 2019
Study Start
October 24, 2019
Primary Completion
March 1, 2020
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 29, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10