The Role of Dopaminergic and Noradrenergic Neurotransmission in Value- and Salience-based Decision-Making
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Approach versus avoidance decisions are at the centre of adaptive behaviour and survival. These decisions are thought to be guided by the value of the choice options, which are a function of the magnitude of predicted rewards and punishments. Moreover, the allocation of attention to choice options is thought to be driven by salience, i.e. the overall importance of the predicted outcomes. While salience increases with the magnitude of both predicted rewards and predicted punishments, value increases with reward but decreases with punishment. In previous research, value and salience have often remained confounded during value-based decision making. Rodent research suggests that value is associated with dopamine and salience with norepinephrine. The present study aims at disentangling value from salience processing during decision-making tasks in healthy subjects by administering dopamine or noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. This is done by using a single dose challenge in a randomized placebo-controlled between subject's design, administering either methylphenidate (35 mg), reboxetine (8 mg), or placebo to healthy young participants before they perform tasks tapping into various aspects of value and salience.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable healthy
Started Jul 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 13, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2020
CompletedMay 1, 2020
April 1, 2020
8 months
April 26, 2020
April 29, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Response time data
The investigators record responses and specifically reaction times during 5 different decision-making tasks. In a value vs salience task, value and salience processing is disentangled during value-based decision-making. Participants either accept or reject compound stimuli that were before associated with monetary outcomes. In a face in the crowd task, participants detect a target face (angry vs happy) in a crowd of opposite face type. During a task on risk and ambiguity decision-making, participants have to decide between safe and lottery options associated with either monetary risk or ambiguity. In an adaptive risk-taking task, participants have to choose between two risky monetary options. In an effort task, participants decide whether they are willing to exert physical effort for monetary reward. Response times are measured in milliseconds from the tasks. The investigators calculate how long participants take to make decisions in each trial.
These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered
Choice data
As a dependent variable the investigators record responses and specifically choices made during the above-mentioned different decision-making tasks. The investigators evaluate what kind of answers were made during each trial of the decision-making tasks, in respect to correctness or preference (percentage).
These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Computational modelling applied to choice data
These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered
Computational modelling applied to response time data
These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered
Study Arms (3)
Dopamine reuptake inhibitor
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the dopamine reuptake inhibitor group will be asked to take one pill containing 35 mg methylphenidate 1.5 hours before performing the tasks.
Noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor group will be asked to take one pill containing 8 mg reboxetine 1.5 hours before performing the tasks.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants in the placebo group will be asked to take a placebo pill 1.5 hours before performing the tasks.
Interventions
35 mg methylphenidate (Ritalin®) is administered once using a randomized placebo-controlled between subject's design
8 mg Reboxetine (Edronax®) is administered once using a randomized placebo-controlled between subject's design
A placebo pill is administered once using a randomized placebo-controlled between subject's design
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Physically and psychiatrically healthy men and women aged ≥ 18- ≤ 35 years
- Ability and willingness to participate in the study
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Serious past brain disease or injury (data quality)
- Frequent headaches (of any sort, \> 1/week) or migraine (irrespective of frequency)
- History of epileptic seizures
- Any neurological disorder
- Surgery to head or heart (safety, potential metal pieces)
- Pacemaker, hearing aid or neurostimulator (safety, metal pieces)
- Known cardiac or cardiovascular disease or anomaly
- Family history of sudden death due to cardiac arrhythmia
- High or low blood pressure, history of heart attack, infrequent heartbeat
- Respiratory problems (including difficulty with breathing through the nose)
- Glaucoma (present or in history)
- Insufficiency of kidney or liver, acute liver disease
- Any psychiatric disorder (especially depression, mania, schizophrenia, addiction and suicidality)
- Severe vocal or motor tics (methylphenidate, data quality)
- Severe psychosomatic disorder (somatic complaints without clear medical cause, has a mental component)
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Zurich
Zurich, 8006, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philippe Tobler, PhD
University of Zurich
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- All participants will receive the same instructions, and neither the participants nor the experimenters are informed which drug is used. Participants must take the drug in front of the investigator, to ensure correct intake and compliance.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2020
First Posted
May 1, 2020
Study Start
July 3, 2019
Primary Completion
February 13, 2020
Study Completion
February 13, 2020
Last Updated
May 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04