NCT05103176

Brief Summary

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a powerful tool to non-invasively modulate brain circuits, brain plasticity, and behavior. This proposal will test the hypothesis that controlling behavioral state during focal multi-day rTMS of a brain region involved in grasping movements will enhance the functional specificity of the neuromodulation action among distributed brain regions involved in voluntary motor control and concomitantly improve manual dexterity. Results from this study will be used to optimize rTMS therapy for individuals with neuromotor impairments by controlling behavioral state to improve the efficacy of rTMS treatment. Healthy volunteers that qualify for this study will have motor skill assessments and basic neuromotor testing (using neurophysiology with TMS and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) scans). Participants will be asked to come in for up to nine sessions that include 1 screening session, 5 consecutive daily rTMS sessions and 3 assessment sessions with resting-state and task-based fMRI, neurophysiology with TMS, and hand motor tasks over the course of 3-4 weeks.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
59

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable healthy

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 19, 2021

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 2, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 15, 2022

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2023

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 4, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 4, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

October 19, 2021

Results QC Date

January 29, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

fMRITMSbrain stimulationtheta burstposterior parietal cortexmotor controlgrasping

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Percentage Change in the Time to Complete the Nine-hole Peg Test (9-HPT) to Immediate Post-intervention

    9-hole peg test (9-HPT) is a manual dexterity measure in which a participant must place 9 pegs in board with 9 holes, and remove all 9 pegs upon the insertion of all 9 pegs. This is completed with one peg at a time, and only one hand is used. For our study, only the right hand was used. The performance is estimated as the time required to complete the task (seconds). A lower time in seconds is indicative of a better score. For percent change in performance, a higher positive percent is indicative improved performance.

    Baseline and immediately post-intervention (session 6, up to Day 15), up to 30 minutes

  • Percentage Change in Amplitude of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) to Immediate Post-intervention.

    Motor cortical excitability is measured by electromyography using MEPs (motor evoked potentials) elicited by TMS (Transcranial magnetic stimulation) to a motor hotspot determined before collection of baseline (baseline occurs before intervention) MEP (motor evoked potential) collection. It was assessed in session 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, although only session 6 is reported here. An increase in MEPs (motor evoked potentials) is indicative of increased cortical excitability. A positive increase in MEP (motor evoked potential) percent change is indicative of increased cortical excitability.

    Baseline and immediately post-intervention (session 6, up to Day 15), up to 60 minutes

  • Change From Baseline Functional Connectivity to PPC Stimulation Target Within the Cortical Grasping Network to Immediate Post-intervention.

    Resting-state connectivity of low frequency BOLD (blood oxygenation level dependent) fluctuations for a seed at the PPC (posterior parietal cortex). The original analysis was a time-series correlation (Pearson's R) of resting state fMRI data between two regions of interest. The Z-score a Fisher's r-to-z transform. 0 for the Z value means that the pearson's correlation was also 0, positive means positive correlation and negative means it was a negative correlation. Therefore, standard deviations above the mean represented greater connectivity between the regions of interest. There were no clinically relevant thresholds to consider. The two time points being compared were scans from session 2 and session 7.

    Baseline (scan acquired during session 2) and immediate post-intervention (scan acquired after intervention during session 7, up to day 20), up to 60 minutes

  • Change From Baseline Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) Activation, Voxelwise in the Cortical Grasp Network to Immediate Post-intervention.

    Parietal-frontal cortical grasping network defined by BOLD change during precision force-tracking task. t-test statistics were acquired for BOLD activation (estimated with univariate GLMs within each individual) from scans pre and post (session 2 and 7) with free surfer software. We ran univariate GLMs for each session for each individual that gave regression coefficients (beta values) for each voxel. We calculated a t-stat for each of those beta-values (each person and session we have a t-stat for our contrast of interest at each voxel). We averaged these across region of interest for each person/session. We ran another paired t-test at the group level to test pre vs post differences. SD shows t-stat variability across people in respective groups. A t-stat of 0 shows no BOLD change, a large positive t-stat shows increase BOLD change (increased connectivity, better outcome), and a large negative t-stat shows decrease BOLD change (decreased connectivity, worse outcome) pre vs post.

    Baseline (scan acquired during session 2) and immediate post-intervention (scan acquired after intervention during session 7, up to day 20), up to 60 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Percentage Change in the Time to Complete the Nine-hole Peg Test (9-HPT) to 1-week Post-intervention

    Baseline and 1-week post intervention (session 8 or 9, approximately 1 week after session 7, up to day 30), up to 30 minutes

  • Percentage Change in Amplitude of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) to 1-week Post-intervention.

    Baseline and 1-week post-intervention (during session 8 or 9, approximately 1 week after session 7, up to day 30), up to 60 minutes

  • Change From Baseline Functional Connectivity to PPC Stimulation Target Within the Cortical Grasping Network to 1-week Post-intervention.

    Baseline (scan acquired during session 2) and 1-week post-intervention (scan during session 8 or 9, approximately 1 week after session 7, up to day 30), up to 60 minutes

  • Change From Baseline Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) Activation, Voxelwise in the Cortical Grasp Network to 1-week Post-intervention.

    Baseline (scan acquired during session 2) and 1-week post-intervention (scan during session 8 or 9, approximately 1 week after session 7, up to day 30), up to 60 minutes

  • Change From Baseline Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) Activation, Voxelwise in Whole Brain to Immediate Post-intervention.

    Baseline (scan acquired during session 2) and immediate post-intervention (scan acquired after intervention during session 7, up to day 20), up to 60 minutes

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

To PPC, with concurrent task

EXPERIMENTAL

This arm will receive intermittent theta bust stimulation to the PPC site while subjects perform a grasp task

Device: TMSBehavioral: Object directed grasping

To PPC, without a concurrent task

EXPERIMENTAL

This arm will receive intermittent theta bust stimulation to the PPC site without a concurrent task

Device: TMS

To vertex, with concurrent task

EXPERIMENTAL

This arm will receive intermittent theta bust stimulation to the vertex site (control condition) while subjects perform a grasp task

Device: TMSBehavioral: Object directed grasping

Interventions

TMSDEVICE

A MagPro X100 magnetic stimulator with a 90mm figure-8 coil (MC-B70, MagVenture Inc.) will be utilized to deliver brain stimulation. All participants will receive five consecutive days of stimulation. The 3-minute session of intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) will consist of 10 bursts of high-frequency stimulation (a 2 s train of 3 biphasic waveform pulses at 50 Hz repeated every 200 ms at 80% AMT) repeated every 10 s for a total of 190 s (600 pulses) to the target area. The target area will be located using BrainSight2 neuronavigation system. The baseline structural scan obtained during the scan 1 will be utilized for this localization process.

Also known as: MagPro X100 TMS system
To PPC, with concurrent taskTo PPC, without a concurrent taskTo vertex, with concurrent task

Subjects will perform a precision grip with the right hand towards either a small or large target object positioned in front of them. The illumination of an LED (green or red) will instruct the subject to plan a precision grip towards either a small or large target object positioned in front of them. After \~1 second, the LED will extinguish and cue subjects to execute the intended object-directed hand action. The presentation of the visual stimuli will be synchronized with the iTBS stimulation, which will occur 800ms before the onset of every "GO" cue in order to modulate cortical activity during both the planning and execution phase of the action.

To PPC, with concurrent taskTo vertex, with concurrent task

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Women of child bearing age cannot be pregnant or trying to become pregnant
  • Ability to tolerate small, enclosed spaces without anxiety
  • Ability and willingness to give informed consent to participate
  • No history of neurological disorder
  • Right handed
  • English speaking

You may not qualify if:

  • Are left-handed
  • Are younger than 18 or older than 50 years old
  • Women who are pregnant, suspect they are pregnant, or are attempting to become pregnant
  • Have metal anywhere in the head, excluding the mouth
  • Have a pacemaker, deep brain stimulator, vagus nerve stimulator or any other medically implanted device
  • Have cochlear hearing implants
  • Are taking GABAergic, NDMA-receptor antagonist, or other drug known to influence neural receptors
  • Have any of the below conditions that would put participants at increased risk of having a seizure: a personal or family history of seizure/epilepsy, taking prescription drugs that lower the threshold for seizures, recent history of excessive alcohol consumption, history of alcohol addiction/dependence, recent history of recreational drug use, history of drug addiction/dependence
  • Have been diagnosed with any of the following: a stroke, brain hemorrhage, brain tumor, encephalitis, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease or Alzheimer's disease, depression in the past 6 months, attention deficit disorder, schizophrenia, manic depressive (bipolar) disorder, normal pressure hydrocephalus or increased intra-cranial pressure, diabetes requiring insulin treatment, any serious heart disorder or liver disease
  • Have had a migraine in the past month

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48170, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Michael Vesia, Assistant Professor
Organization
University of Michigan

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the 3 arms of the study. Subjects will be blind to which arm they are in, however, will be aware of what is involved within each of the arms.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The investigators will use a randomized block design with up to 65 subjects in up to nine sessions. The first session will screen subjects before enrolling subjects into study. Three sessions will collect functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans, neurophysiological measures with TMS, and behavioral measures. After a baseline testing session, subsequent sessions over five days will entail rTMS, followed by two assessments to evaluate the effects of stimulation on brain and behavior. rTMS intervention sessions will consist of: (i) Posterior Parietal Cortex (PPC) stimulation alone, (ii) PPC stimulation paired with a grasp task or (iii) vertex stimulation (as a control condition) paired with a grasp task. Duration of study: Approximately 3-4 weeks (depending upon scheduling)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, Movement Science

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2021

First Posted

November 2, 2021

Study Start

February 15, 2022

Primary Completion

May 31, 2023

Study Completion

May 31, 2023

Last Updated

April 4, 2025

Results First Posted

April 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The PI will share information about this/these trial(s) via timely registration, updates, and results reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov in accordance with NIH policy. De-identified data will be entered into the in ClinicalTrials.gov in accordance with NIH policy within 1 year of the conclusion of the study. In accord with NIH regulations, the investigators will make the data and relevant documentation available to other investigators upon acceptance of the main findings from the study for publication. The investigators will share analysis tools as they are developed. Because the collected data are to remain anonymous, only a subject number will identify all data. To further protect the privacy and confidentiality of the data, data and documentation will be made available only under a data-sharing agreement that provides for restrictions for the transferring of data to others and a commitment that the data will be used for research purposes only and not for a profit-making enterprise.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
Within 1 year of the conclusion of the study
Access Criteria
No additional access restrictions will be placed on the de-identified data beyond those that are standard for the NIH.

Locations