Peer i-Coaching for Activated Self-Management Optimization in Adolescents and Young Adults With Chronic Conditions
PiCASO
2 other identifiers
interventional
222
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of a peer support coaching intervention to improve activated chronic illness self-management versus an attention control group in 225 adolescents and young adults with childhood onset chronic conditions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 29, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 19, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 28, 2025
CompletedJuly 28, 2025
July 1, 2025
4.6 years
May 2, 2019
June 3, 2025
July 25, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Self-management as Measured by the Partners in Health Scale
Self-management variable measured using the Partners in Health Scale (PIH): measures chronic illness self-management by assessing chronic condition self-management knowledge, partnership in treatment, recognition and management of symptoms, and coping. This 12 item self-report scale is scored on a 9-point Likert scale. The primary outcome is the overall score, which is the mean of the 12 items (possible range of 0 to 8, higher overall scores indicating better self-management).
baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Patient Activation as Measured by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13)
Patient Activation variable measured using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13): measures patient activation through self-reports of knowledge, skills, and confidence related to self-management of one's own health care. This 13-item self-report assesses confidence in self-management and understanding of health condition. Each of the 13 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The primary outcome is an activation score derived from the 13 items (possible range of 0-100, higher scores indicating higher patient activation in self-management).
baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Transition Readiness as Measured by the Transition Readiness Questionnaire (TRAQ 20)
baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Change in Health-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF12) - Mental Component Summary (MCS)
baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Change in Emotional Health as Measured by the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI 18)
baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
PiCASO Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALPeer coaching intervention delivered by young adults with a childhood onset chronic condition and trained in coaching curriculum that includes motivational interviewing techniques and the benefits of peer relationships over a shared experience such as a chronic condition. The peer coach supports the AYA to identify their goals and feel a sense of success in making change towards goals within a supportive environment. This process involves goal-setting, development of self-discovery and accountability for changes in health behavior. The peer coach elicits the AYA's vision of optimal health and identifies the AYAs values. As the AYAs identify a vision of wellness and develop goals and action steps to progress towards that vision, the peer coach elicits the AYA's intrinsic motivation and activates skill development in self-advocacy and communication and empowers the AYA to take leadership in managing their condition.
Attention Control Group
SHAM COMPARATOROver 12 months the attention control group participants will receive a monthly electronic newsletter with educational content about childhood onset chronic condition management and the differences between pediatric and adult health care systems, as well as a monthly phone call from study staff to ensure receipt of the newsletter and to answer questions regarding content, and an opportunity to link them to other resources. If participants report health concerns they will be directed to contact their health care team.
Interventions
This mobile health intervention utilizes an established telephone/text based secure interface to allow AYAs access knowledge, experience, and instrumental/emotional support from a trained peer coach who has already developed independence an active self-manager. Peers with shared experiences provide instrumental (e.g., health maintenance skills) and emotional support that likely lead to improvements in quality of life. Involving peers in supporting AYAs with chronic conditions to promote self-management and patient activation disrupts the typical over-reliance on the parent and health care provider that often impedes developing independence.
Over 12 months the attention control group participants will receive a monthly electronic newsletter with educational content about childhood onset chronic condition management and the differences between pediatric and adult health care systems, as well as a monthly phone call from study staff to ensure receipt of the newsletter and to answer questions regarding content, and an opportunity to link them to other resources. If participants report health concerns they will be directed to contact their health care team.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- AYA 16 to 22 years
- Childhood onset chronic condition from 1 of 3 condition categories
- Read and speaks English
- Access to internet via computer or Smart Phone
- Access to telephone (Smart Phone not required as text feature can be accessed via internet)
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed cognitive dysfunction
- Need for English translator
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Related Publications (1)
Tiles-Sar N, Neuser J, de Sordi D, Baltes A, Preiss JC, Moser G, Timmer A. Psychological interventions for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 17;4(4):CD006913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006913.pub3.
PMID: 40243391DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sharron Docherty, PhD
- Organization
- Duke University
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Angel Barnes, BSN
Duke University School of Nursing
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2019
First Posted
May 6, 2019
Study Start
October 29, 2019
Primary Completion
June 19, 2024
Study Completion
June 19, 2024
Last Updated
July 28, 2025
Results First Posted
July 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share