In Person and mHealth Coping Skills Training for Symptom Management and Steps in Stem Cell Transplant Patients
Symptoms-Steps
Development and Pilot Testing of a Hybrid In Person and mHealth Coping Skills Training Intervention for Symptom Management and Daily Steps in Stem Cell Transplant Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) is an aggressive treatment for life-threatening cancers. HCT improves survival, but most HCT patients experience significant physical disability, which is exacerbated by persistent symptoms. Pain, fatigue, and psychological distress are the most prevalent and debilitating symptoms. HCT patients experience a significant increase in disability as their pain, fatigue, and distress increase. This disability and symptom burden interferes with patients' ability to engage in recommended physical activity that can improve disability, symptoms, and other outcomes. Disability and symptoms also complicate an already challenging recovery course; HCT patients return home, often far from their medical team, are restricted from normal activities and socially isolated. These disability, symptom and activity challenges increase the risk for post-transplant complications and may compromise life expectancy. Teaching HCT patients to cope with symptoms and activity is critical to helping them increase activity and reduce disability. Cognitive behavioral coping skills training protocols can enhance HCT patients' ability to cope with symptoms (pain, fatigue, distress) that interfere with physical activity. However, the application of these protocols to HCT patients is limited by in person sessions, delivery of sessions in a medical center setting, and/or lack of tailoring to HCT patients' specific needs. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies can improve and extend intervention strategies to cope with symptoms and physical activity upon return home. Behavioral intervention strategies are needed to enable HCT patients to effectively cope with symptoms to improve their ability to engage in physical activity that can improve physical disability. The investigators aim to develop and test a combined coping skills training and activity coaching protocol that: first, is feasible and acceptable, and second, improves physical disability, as well as pain, fatigue, distress, and physical activity in HCT patients. Specifically, the investigators will develop and test an in-person and mHealth HCT Coping Skills Training for Symptom Management and Daily Steps (HCT Symptoms and Steps) intervention protocol. To do this, the investigators will develop a mobile app, conduct focus groups, complete user testing, and conduct a small randomized controlled trial (RCT) to examine feasibility, acceptability, and outcome patterns suggesting intervention efficacy of the developed HCT Symptoms and Steps protocol. Following the development phase of the study (i.e., focus groups), the investigators will conduct user testing with 10 cancer patients who have undergone HCT; all 10 patients will receive the HCT Symptoms and Steps intervention. Next, the investigators will randomly assign 40 cancer participants who have undergone HCT and report pain, fatigue and stress to receive either HCT Symptoms and Steps or HCT Education. The investigators will test whether HCT Symptoms and Steps is feasible and acceptable to HCT patients, and improves physical disability, as well as other important outcomes. The investigators expect that HCT Symptoms and Steps will be feasible and acceptable to HCT patients and, compared to HCT Education, will be more likely to lead to improvements in physical disability, as well as pain, fatigue, distress, physical activity, and self-efficacy for symptom management. The investigators' goal is to demonstrate the feasibility, acceptability, and positive impact of a hybrid in-person and mHealth coping skills training and activity coaching intervention that reduces physical disability by concurrently and synergistically decreasing symptom burden and increasing physical activity. This project has the potential to lead to future research that can redesign existing modes of behavioral intervention delivery, improve continuity and coordination of care, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 23, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 22, 2024
CompletedMarch 22, 2024
September 1, 2022
2.4 years
February 12, 2019
September 23, 2022
September 10, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Feasibility as Measured by Number of Participants Accrued to the Study Within 16 Months
Feasibility will be shown by meeting targeted study accrual (N=40) in the 16-month study period.
16 months (additional year granted due to COVID-19).
Number of Participants Who Adhere to at Least 80% of the Study Protocol
A measure of feasibility.
approximately 20-24 weeks
Number of Participants Who do Not Complete the 3-month Post-treatment Follow-up Assessment
A measure of feasibility.
approximately 20-24 weeks
Acceptability as Measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) 8-item Version
This questionnaire contains 8 items rated from 1=low acceptability to 4=high acceptability; scores are created by utilizing the Likert Scale to sum CSQ answers resulting in a score range from 8 to 32. The intervention is considered acceptable if the mean value for acceptability across all participants is above 80% of max acceptability score (i.e., 25.6).
post-treatment (approximately 7-12 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in Physical Disability as Measured by the the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)
pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (approximately 7-12 weeks)
Change in Pain Severity
pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (approximately 7-12 weeks).
Change in Fatigue
pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (approximately 7-12 weeks).
Change in Physical Activity
pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (approximately 7-12 weeks).
Change in Depression
pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (approximately 7-12 weeks)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
HCT Symptoms and Steps
EXPERIMENTALHCT Symptoms and Steps participants will complete in-person (3) and video-conferencing (4) coping skills training and activity coaching sessions teaching cognitive behavioral coping skills to manage pain, fatigue, and distress and increase activity. Participants will be given a wireless activity tracker and a smartphone for accessing the study mobile app.
HCT Education
NO INTERVENTIONHCT Education participants will receive 1 brief in clinic session prior to discharge home providing education related to symptom management and physical activity, and a wireless activity tracker. HCT Education participants will also receive 6 brief phone calls upon return home.
Interventions
HCT Symptoms and Steps will provide patients with cognitive behavioral coping skills training and activity coaching sessions to enhance their ability to manage symptoms that interfere with activity.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hematopoietic stem cell transplant due to oncological disease
- Clinical ratings of pain, fatigue and psychological distress
- Life expectancy of 12 or more months
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive impairment
- Severe psychiatric condition
- Inability to converse in English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Duke Cancer Institute
Durham, North Carolina, 27701, United States
Related Publications (1)
Kelleher SA, Fisher HM, Hyland K, Miller SN, Amaden G, Diachina A, Pittman AS, Winger JG, Sung A, Berchuck S, Samsa G, Somers TJ. Hybrid-delivered cognitive behavioral symptom management and activity coaching intervention for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant: Findings from intervention development and a pilot randomized trial. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023;41(5):539-557. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2022.2152519. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
PMID: 36476318DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sarah A Kelleher, PhD
- Organization
- Duke University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2019
First Posted
March 1, 2019
Study Start
July 23, 2019
Primary Completion
December 20, 2021
Study Completion
December 20, 2021
Last Updated
March 22, 2024
Results First Posted
March 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2022-09