NCT03752489

Brief Summary

The focus of this study will be to conduct a prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) at Cape Regional Medical Center (CRMC), Oroville Hospital (OH), and UCSF Medical Center (UCSF) in which a fluid treatment-specific algorithm will be applied to EHR data for the detection of severe sepsis. For patients determined to have a high risk of severe sepsis, the algorithm will generate automated voice, telephone notification to nursing staff at CRMC, OH, and UCSF. The algorithm's performance will be measured by analysis of the primary endpoint, reductions in in-hospital mortality.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
51,645

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2 sepsis

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 21, 2018

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 26, 2018

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2022

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

September 23, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

November 21, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 17, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Dascenamachine learningfluid administrationclustering algorithmmortalitydiagnostic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • In-hospital SIRS-based mortality

    Mortality attributed to patients meeting two or more SIRS criteria at some point during their stay

    Through study completion, an average of 8 months

Study Arms (2)

Fluid treatment-specific algorithm

EXPERIMENTAL

The experimental arm will involve patients monitored by the fluid treatment-customized version of InSight.

Diagnostic Test: Treatment-specific InSight

Standard InSight

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The control arm will involve patients monitored with the standard, non-treatment specific version of InSight.

Diagnostic Test: InSight

Interventions

The InSight algorithm which draws information from a patient's electronic health record (EHR) to predict the onset of severe sepsis, and in this study will be customized to differentiate between clusters of patients who respond similarly to fluids treatment according to the nature of their disease progression.

Fluid treatment-specific algorithm
InSightDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The non-customized InSight algorithm which draws information from a patient's electronic health record (EHR) to predict the onset of severe sepsis.

Standard InSight

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All adults above age 18 who are a member of one of the clinical subpopulations studied in this trial are eligible to participate in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Under age 18

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Calvert J, Mao Q, Hoffman JL, Jay M, Desautels T, Mohamadlou H, Chettipally U, Das R. Using electronic health record collected clinical variables to predict medical intensive care unit mortality. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Sep 6;11:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.09.002. eCollection 2016 Nov.

    PMID: 27699003BACKGROUND
  • Shimabukuro DW, Barton CW, Feldman MD, Mataraso SJ, Das R. Effect of a machine learning-based severe sepsis prediction algorithm on patient survival and hospital length of stay: a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017 Nov 9;4(1):e000234. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000234. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 29435343BACKGROUND
  • Mao Q, Jay M, Hoffman JL, Calvert J, Barton C, Shimabukuro D, Shieh L, Chettipally U, Fletcher G, Kerem Y, Zhou Y, Das R. Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e017833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017833.

    PMID: 29374661BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SepsisShock, SepticDisease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShock

Study Officials

  • Qingqing Mao, PhD

    Dascena, Inc.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Qingqing Mao, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2018

First Posted

November 26, 2018

Study Start

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion

March 31, 2024

Study Completion

March 31, 2024

Last Updated

September 23, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09