NCT03734484

Brief Summary

The focus of this study will be to conduct a prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) at Cape Regional Medical Center (CRMC), Oroville Hospital (OH), and UCSF Medical Center (UCSF) in which a Gram type infection-specific algorithm will be applied to EHR data for the detection of severe sepsis. For patients determined to have a high risk of severe sepsis, the algorithm will generate automated voice, telephone notification to nursing staff at CRMC, OH, and UCSF. The algorithm's performance will be measured by analysis of the primary endpoint, time to antibiotic administration. The secondary endpoint will be reduction in the administration of unnecessary antibiotics, which includes reductions in secondary antibiotics and reductions in total time on antibiotics.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Shorter than P25 for phase_2 sepsis

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 1, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 8, 2018

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 23, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

November 1, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 17, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

DascenaGram infectionantibiotic administrationmachine learningalgorithmdiagnostic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in time to antibiotic administration

    Change in time period between diagnosis of Gram infection and administration of antibiotics to treat infection

    Through study completion, an average of 8 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in administration of unnecessary antibiotics

    Through study completion, an average of 8 months

  • Change in administration of unnecessary antibiotics

    Through study completion, an average of 8 months

Study Arms (2)

Gram type infection-specific algorithm

EXPERIMENTAL

The experimental arm will involve patients monitored by the Gram type infection-customized version of InSight.

Diagnostic Test: InSight

Standard treatment protocol

NO INTERVENTION

The control arm will involve patients treated with the regular diagnosis and treatment protocol for gram-type infection, where fluid cultures are run to determine infection type.

Interventions

InSightDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The InSight algorithm which draws information from a patient's electronic health record (EHR) to predict the onset of severe sepsis, and in this study will be customized to differentiate between various Gram-type infections.

Gram type infection-specific algorithm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All adults above age 18 who are a member of one of the three subpopulations studied in this trial (patients with Gram-positive infection, patients with Gram-negative infection, and patients with mixed Gram-positive and Gram-negative infection) are eligible to participate in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Under age 18
  • No record of Gram infection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Calvert J, Mao Q, Hoffman JL, Jay M, Desautels T, Mohamadlou H, Chettipally U, Das R. Using electronic health record collected clinical variables to predict medical intensive care unit mortality. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Sep 6;11:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.09.002. eCollection 2016 Nov.

    PMID: 27699003BACKGROUND
  • Shimabukuro DW, Barton CW, Feldman MD, Mataraso SJ, Das R. Effect of a machine learning-based severe sepsis prediction algorithm on patient survival and hospital length of stay: a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017 Nov 9;4(1):e000234. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000234. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 29435343BACKGROUND
  • Mao Q, Jay M, Hoffman JL, Calvert J, Barton C, Shimabukuro D, Shieh L, Chettipally U, Fletcher G, Kerem Y, Zhou Y, Das R. Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e017833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017833.

    PMID: 29374661BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SepsisShock, SepticDisease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShock

Study Officials

  • Ritankar Das, MSc

    Dascena

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2018

First Posted

November 8, 2018

Study Start

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion

November 30, 2022

Study Completion

March 1, 2023

Last Updated

September 23, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09