Comparison of Different Quadriceps Femoris Isometric Strengthening Methods
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background:It has been reported in previous studies that more motor units are fired with electrical stimulation than voluntary muscle contraction, and even high intensity currents provide 10-30% more contractions than voluntary muscle contraction. Objective:This study was planned to compare the effectiveness of high voltage pulsed galvanic (HVPG) stimulation, Russian current and isometric exercise on quadriceps femoris (QF) isometric muscle strength in healthy young women. Methods:Forty-six healthy young women were included in the study (mean age=21.02 ± 1.27). Before and after the training, the dominant side QF isometric muscle strength of participants was assessed with the Isokinetic Dynamometer . The peak torque and average torques of the participants were recorded after the test. The training was planned as HVPG current for the the first group (n = 16), as Russian current for the second group (n = 15) and as isometric strengthening for the third group (n = 15). All treatments were performed under physiotherapist supervision for a total of 15 sessions for 3 days a week for 5 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 24, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 24, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 24, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 11, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 23, 2018
CompletedOctober 23, 2018
October 1, 2018
2 months
October 11, 2018
October 19, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Isokinetic Strength measurement
Muscle strength, Isokinetic strength measurement: The dominant side QF isometric muscle strength (torque measurements) of the participants was assessed with the Isokinetic Dynamometer (Humac Norm Testing Rehabilitation System, CSMI Medical Solutions, USA).
One week
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Isometric exercise
One week
Study Arms (3)
High Voltage Pulsed Galvanic Current
ACTIVE COMPARATORHVPG current is a new form of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.The total output voltage of the device ranged from 0 to 500 volts and the current intensity was increased until the sensible contraction of the applied muscle was achieved without causing too much sense of discomfort
Russian Current
PLACEBO COMPARATORRussian currents are a high frequency current of 2500 Hz and reduce the resistance of the skin and it would penetrate deeper and reach deeper motor nerves.Russian movement, a protocol developed by Kots, also known as "Russian Technique", was used in the literature. There were 10 muscle contractions per treatment session in this protocol. Each contraction lasted for 10 seconds and a resting time of 50 seconds were given for the next contraction (transition: rest ratio was 1/5).
Isometric Exercise
SHAM COMPARATORIsometric or static strength training is exercises performed without joint movement and changing muscle length during muscle contraction. The body and knee of the participants in the isometric exercise group were positioned and stabilized at 75 ° flexion and 60 ° flexion angle, respectively as in the stimulation groups. Participants were asked to do 10 repetitions as 10 seconds of maximum voluntary contractions and 10 seconds of rest.
Interventions
The training was planned as HVPG current for the the first group (n = 16), as Russian current for the second group (n = 15) and as isometric strengthening for the third group (n = 15). All treatments were performed under physiotherapist supervision for a total of 15 sessions for 3 days a week for 5 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Not having knee complaints such as pain, lockout, morning arrest, swelling, difficulty in walking.
- Not having any orthopedic or neurological disability
You may not qualify if:
- Exercising regularly for the last six months.
- Presence of cardiovascular, pulmonary, orthopedic and neurological problems which may prevent exercise.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bilge Basakci Calik
Kınıklı, 20000, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 11, 2018
First Posted
October 23, 2018
Study Start
September 24, 2017
Primary Completion
November 24, 2017
Study Completion
July 24, 2018
Last Updated
October 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share