Effects of Ascending and Descending Direct Current on the Handgrip Strength
1 other identifier
interventional
87
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Electrical stimulation currently has a wide range of clinical applications, being used for activities such as strengthening, pain control, edema management, or inflammation control after injury or surgery. One of the classic forms of electrotherapy is the Direct current (galvanic current), which stands out for its unique effects (polar and interpolar effects) and that are not achieved with other modalities of electrotherapy. Within these effects those activators or suppressors of nervous system activity are described. One of the applications of direct current is to produce sedation or excitation on the nervous system through longitudinal applications (longitudinal galvanization). This application technique is known as the upstream or downstream effect of the direct current or "Leduc Effect", in which it is postulated that an ascending type longitudinal galvanization has excitation effects of the central and / or peripheral nervous system. The study will evaluate the influence of the upward and downward direct current effect when performing a manual dynamometer test while monitoring by miofeedback in college students.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 12, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 2, 2018
CompletedSeptember 12, 2018
August 1, 2018
2 months
May 9, 2017
September 10, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Difference of Maximum handgrip force
Comparing maximum handgrip strength pre and post application of upward and downward direct current intervention
Baseline and 1 hours later (1 session of treatment), assessed as up to 1 month.
Difference of Maximum Electromiographic Activation Threshold
Comparing maximum Electromiographic Activation pre and post application of upward and downward direct current intervention
Baseline and 1 hours later (1 session of treatment), assessed as up to 1 month.
Study Arms (3)
Upward Direct Current (Ascending Effect)
EXPERIMENTALGroup subjected to a direct current application (Longitudinal Galvanization) in which the anode is placed at the distal level and the cathode at the proximal level. This would be an excitatory effect of the nervous system.
Downward Direct Current (Descending Effect)
EXPERIMENTALGroup subjected to a direct current application (Longitudinal Galvanization) in which the cathode is placed at the distal level and the anode at the proximal level. This would be an inhibitory effect of the nervous system.
Sham Direct Current
SHAM COMPARATORGroup to which an electrical installation will be carried out without emission of part of the electrotherapy equipment. The electrodes will be applied longitudinally to the participants with the equipment switched off.
Interventions
Application of direct current (Galvanic) in milliamperes current which varies according to the positioning of the electrodes. In the ascending stream direct current (Ascending effect) the proximal cathode and distal anode are placed, a excitatory effect on the nervous system being described in theory.
Application of direct current (Galvanic) in milliamperes current which varies according to the positioning of the electrodes. In the descending stream direct current (Descending effect) the proximal anode and distal cathode are placed, a sedative and analgesic effect on the nervous system being described in theory.
Installation of electrotherapy equipment off (Sham tratment).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Students of the Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences.
- Participants older than 18 years of age.
- Participants who do not show discomfort or pain when performing manual grip in the dominant hand.
You may not qualify if:
- Musculoskeletal pathologies of hand, wrist or elbow in the last 6 months.
- Materials of osteosynthesis or prosthesis in areas of application.
- Peripheral neurological pathologies such as or nerve compression cuts.
- Sensitivity alterations such as hypoesthesia, anesthesia or hyperesthesia in the upper limbs.
- Alterations in the skin of the application areas, such as burns, wounds, scars.
- Apprehension or fear of the application of electrotherapy.
- Non-completion of the evaluation / intervention protocol, designed for the study or abandonment of the same.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad Andrés Bello
Santiago, Las Condes, 7591538, Chile
Related Publications (21)
Michelle H. Cameron, Physical Agents in Rehabilitations 2003, Elsevier. Cap. VIII, P, 220.
BACKGROUNDRodríguez Martin JM, Galvanismo V. En J. Rodríguez, Electroterapia en fisioterapia. 2 Edición. Madrid: Editorial Médica Panamericana, 2004.
BACKGROUNDAvendaño Coy, A. Ferri Morales, E. Sánchez Sobrados, A. Ceciaga Ajuria. Efectos de la galvanización sobre el umbral excitomotor. Estudio sobre individuos sanos. Rev Iberoam Fisioter Kinesiol 2001;4(1):00-00.
BACKGROUNDKahn J. Iontophoresis. Phys Ther. 1984 Jun;64(6):956, 959. doi: 10.1093/ptj/64.6.956a. No abstract available.
PMID: 6728918BACKGROUNDRaiman J, Koljonen M, Huikko K, Kostiainen R, Hirvonen J. Delivery and stability of LHRH and Nafarelin in human skin: the effect of constant/pulsed iontophoresis. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004 Feb;21(2-3):371-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2003.11.003.
PMID: 14757511BACKGROUNDGuy RH, Delgado-Charro MB, Kalia YN. Iontophoretic transport across the skin. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol. 2001;14 Suppl 1:35-40. doi: 10.1159/000056388.
PMID: 11509905BACKGROUNDGalvani, L. Opere edite ed inedite del Professore Luigi Galvani raccolte e pubblicate dall'Accademia delle Science dell'Istituto di Bologna. Bologna: Dall'Olmo; 1841.
BACKGROUNDPanus PC, Ferslew KE, Tober-Meyer B, Kao RL. Ketoprofen tissue permeation in swine following cathodic iontophoresis. Phys Ther. 1999 Jan;79(1):40-9.
PMID: 9920190BACKGROUNDKalia YN, Naik A, Garrison J, Guy RH. Iontophoretic drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004 Mar 27;56(5):619-58. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.026.
PMID: 15019750BACKGROUNDFujita M, Hukuda S, Doida Y. The effect of constant direct electrical current on intrinsic healing in the flexor tendon in vitro. An ultrastructural study of differing attitudes in epitenon cells and tenocytes. J Hand Surg Br. 1992 Feb;17(1):94-8. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(92)90021-s.
PMID: 1640154BACKGROUNDConjeevaram R, Banga AK, Zhang L. Electrically modulated transdermal delivery of fentanyl. Pharm Res. 2002 Apr;19(4):440-4. doi: 10.1023/a:1015135426838.
PMID: 12033377BACKGROUNDOh SY, Guy RH. Effects of iontophoresis on electrical properties of human skin in vivo. Int J Pharmacol 1995;124:137-42.
BACKGROUNDWatanabe T, Owashi K, Kanauchi Y, Mura N, Takahara M, Ogino T. The short-term reliability of grip strength measurement and the effects of posture and grip span. J Hand Surg Am. 2005 May;30(3):603-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.12.007.
PMID: 15925174BACKGROUNDO'Driscoll SW, Horii E, Ness R, Cahalan TD, Richards RR, An KN. The relationship between wrist position, grasp size, and grip strength. J Hand Surg Am. 1992 Jan;17(1):169-77. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(92)90136-d.
PMID: 1538102BACKGROUNDInnes E. Handgrip strength testing: A review of the literature. Aust Occup Ther J 1999; 46(3):120-140.)
BACKGROUNDMathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985 Feb;66(2):69-74.
PMID: 3970660BACKGROUNDKozin SH, Porter S, Clark P, Thoder JJ. The contribution of the intrinsic muscles to grip and pinch strength. J Hand Surg Am. 1999 Jan;24(1):64-72. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.1999.jhsu24a0064.
PMID: 10048518BACKGROUNDGlass JM, Stephen RL, Jacobson SC. The quantity and distribution of radiolabeled dexamethasone delivered to tissue by iontophoresis. Int J Dermatol. 1980 Nov;19(9):519-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1980.tb00380.x.
PMID: 7429701BACKGROUNDMargin del Socorro Martínez Matheus, Principios de Electroestimulación y terminología Electroterapéutica Primea edición Bogotá año 2006 P, 34 a 39.
BACKGROUNDMcNeal DR: 2000 years of electrical stimulation. In: Hambrecht FT Ryswick JB, eds: Functional Electrical Stimulation: Applications Neural Prostheses, New York, 1977 Marcel Dekker.
BACKGROUNDVolta, A. Le opere di Alessandro Volta (edizione nazionale), I vol. Milano; Hoepli; 1918.
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hernán Andrés A de la Barra Ortiz, Mg.
Study Principal Investigator
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator and Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2017
First Posted
May 12, 2017
Study Start
June 26, 2017
Primary Completion
August 26, 2017
Study Completion
August 2, 2018
Last Updated
September 12, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08