Graphomotor Intervention Program for Handwriting Difficulties Prevention in School-Age
The Effects of a Graphomotor Intervention Program According to a Psychomotor Approach on Quality and Speed of Handwriting in School-Age Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
47
1 country
1
Brief Summary
12-30% of children present handwriting difficulties, which has negative repercussions on their school career. For this reason, it is fundamental to bet on their prevention. The aim of present study is to examine the effects of a graphomotor intervention program on quality and speed of handwriting in second-grade children. This experimental study is a randomized controlled trial. The program will run for 8 weeks (2 sessions/week of 30 minutes), followed by 6 months of follow-up without intervention. Participants will be assessed 1) at baseline, 2) at the end of the program, and 3) after the follow-up. Participants will be randomly allocated to two groups: experimental group (graphomotor intervention program) and control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 9, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedMarch 27, 2020
March 1, 2020
1.2 years
October 5, 2018
March 26, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from Baseline, between and within groups comparison, in Motor Performance
Outcome Measure - Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition to assess manual dexterity, aiming and catching and balance
0, 4, 10 months
Change from Baseline, between and within groups comparison, in handwriting performance
Outcome Measure - The Concise Assessment Scale for Children's Handwriting (BHK) to assess quality and speed of handwriting
0, 4, 10 months
Change from Baseline, between and within groups comparison, in Computerized Handwriting Process Measures
Outcome Measure - The MovAlyzeR to assess spatial, temporal and kinematic variables of handwriting
0, 4, 10 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Sociodemographic characteristics
0 months
Change from Baseline, between and within groups comparison, in Manual Preference
0, 4, 10 months
Study Arms (2)
Graphomotor intervention program
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group (EG) intervention comprises a graphomotor intervention program according to a psychomotor approach. The program integrates two group sessions (6-8 children)/week of 30 minutes for 8 weeks (16 sessions).
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group (CG) participants will maintain their normal classroom activities. After the study, control group participants will be offered the opportunity to integrate a similar graphomotor intervention program.
Interventions
The graphomotor intervention program aims to promote the development and reinforcement, different skills involved in the learning process of handwriting and has a preventive character. It follows a bodily, playful, multisensory, exploratory (sensory integration) and neuromotor task training approach and focuses on the following intervention domains: segmental awareness, passive relaxation, trunk-limb dissociation, interdigital coordination, attention, planning, spatial organization/orientation and perception.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children in the second grade (aged 7 years old);
- Participation agreement;
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed or suspected of neurological disabilities (e.g., cerebral palsy, epilepsy), psychiatric and/or behavioural disorders;
- Presence of uncorrected vision and hearing problems;
- Referenced by Special Education/National Service of Early Intervention in Childhood;
- Presence of one or more school retentions;
- Native language is not Portuguese;
- Children with direct intervention in graphomotor skills or who had a similar intervention to that proposed less than 1 year ago;
- Participation in the intervention program of less than 80%;
- Children undergoing drug therapy (e.g., antihistamines) that interfere with the study variables;
- Do not wish to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Helena Isabel Falcão Coradinho
Evora, 7040, Portugal
Related Publications (16)
Engel-Yeger B, Rosenblum S. The effects of protracted graphomotor tasks on tripod pinch strength and handwriting performance in children with dysgraphia. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(21):1749-57. doi: 10.3109/09638281003734375.
PMID: 20373859BACKGROUNDZeziger P, Deonna T, Mayor C. L'acquisition de l'écriture. Enfance. 2000; 3:295-304. Available at: http://www.persee.fr/doc/enfan_0013-7545_2000_num_53_3_3186
BACKGROUNDDenton PL, Cope S, Moser C. The effects of sensorimotor-based intervention versus therapeutic practice on improving handwriting performance in 6- to 11-year-old children. Am J Occup Ther. 2006 Jan-Feb;60(1):16-27. doi: 10.5014/ajot.60.1.16.
PMID: 16541981BACKGROUNDSchneck C, Amundson S. Prewriting and Handwriting Skills. In Case-Smith J., O'Brien J, cords. Occupational Therapy for Children. Missouri: Elsevier; 2010. p. 555-82.
BACKGROUNDAlhusaini AA, Melam GR, Buragadda S. Short-term sensorimotor-based intervention for handwriting performance in elementary school children. Pediatr Int. 2016 Nov;58(11):1118-1123. doi: 10.1111/ped.13004. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
PMID: 27085075BACKGROUNDSoppelsa R, Albaret JM. Caractéristiques de la dysgraphie ou du trouble de l'apprentissage de la graphomotricité (TAG) au collège. A.N.A.E. 2014 Fev; 128:1-6. Available at: http://www.psychomot.ups-tlse.fr/Soppelsa-Albaret2014.pdf
BACKGROUNDRosenblum S, Aloni T, Josman N. Relationships between handwriting performance and organizational abilities among children with and without dysgraphia: a preliminary study. Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):502-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.10.016. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
PMID: 19945252BACKGROUNDSoppelsa R, Abizeid C, Chéron A, Laurent A, Danna J, Albaret, JM. Dysgraphies et rééducation psychomotrice: Données actuelles. In: Albaret JM, Matta Abizeid C, Soppelsa R. Les Entretiens de Bichat. Publisher: Toulouse - Europa Digital & Publishing, Editors; 2016. p 5-11.
BACKGROUNDRosenblum S, Dror G. Identifying Developmental Dysgraphia Characteristics Utilizing Handwriting Classification Methods. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems. 2016 Oct; 47(2): 293-8. doi: 10.1109/THMS.2016.2628799
BACKGROUNDLachaux-Parker C. Troubles de l'écriture et psychomotricité. Revue francophone d'orthoptie. 2012; 5:143-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rfo.2013.02.002
BACKGROUNDBorghese NA, Palmiotto C, Essenziale J, Mainetti R, Granocchio E, Molteni B et al. Assessment of Exergames as Treatment and Prevention of Dysgraphia. In: Ibáñez J, González-Vargas J, Azorín J, Akay M, Pons J. Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation II. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 431-6.
BACKGROUNDGraham S, Harris KR. Preventing Writing Difficulties: Providing Additional Handwriting and Spelling Instruction to At-Risk Children in First Grade. Teaching Exceptional Children. 2006 May/Jun; 38(5):64-66. doi: 10.1177/004005990603800509
BACKGROUNDGraham S, Harris KR, & Fink B. Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2000; 92(4):620-33. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.620
BACKGROUNDHowe TH, Roston KL, Sheu CF, Hinojosa J. Assessing handwriting intervention effectiveness in elementary school students: a two-group controlled study. Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Jan-Feb;67(1):19-26. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.005470.
PMID: 23245779BACKGROUNDHoy MM, Egan MY, Feder KP. A systematic review of interventions to improve handwriting. Can J Occup Ther. 2011 Feb;78(1):13-25. doi: 10.2182/cjot.2011.78.1.3.
PMID: 21395194BACKGROUNDMatias A, Vieira C. Programa de intervenção grafomotora. [In press].
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helena IF Coradinho, MSc
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2018
First Posted
October 9, 2018
Study Start
October 15, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
March 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share