Graphomotor Intervention Program for Handwriting Difficulties Prevention in Preschool Age
The Effects of a Graphomotor Intervention Program According to a Psychomotor Approach on Graphomotor Competences in Preschool Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
12-30% of children present handwriting difficulties, which has negative repercussions on their school career. For this reason, it is fundamental to bet on their prevention. The aim of present study is to examine the effects of a graphomotor intervention program on graphomotor competences in children in the last year of preschool education. This experimental study is a randomized controlled trial. The program will run for 8 weeks (2 sessions/week of 30 minutes), followed by 6 months of follow-up without intervention. Participants will be assessed 1) at baseline, 2) at the end of the program, and 3) after the follow-up. Participants will be randomly allocated to two groups: experimental group (graphomotor intervention program) and control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 9, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedMarch 27, 2020
March 1, 2020
1.2 years
October 5, 2018
March 26, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change from Baseline, between and within groups comparison, in Manual Preference
Outcome Measure - Manual Preference Questionnaire to assess manual preference
0, 4, 10 months
Change from Baseline, between and within groups comparison, in Motor Performance
Outcome Measure - Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition to assess manual dexterity, aiming and catching and balance
0, 4, 10 months
Change from Baseline, between and within groups comparison, in Visual-Motor Integration
Outcome Measure - Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, Sixth Edition to assess visual-motor integration, visual perception and motor coordination
0, 4, 10 months
Change from Baseline, between and within groups comparison, in Computerized Handwriting Process Measures
Outcome Measure - The MovAlyzeR to assess spatial, temporal and kinematic variables of handwriting
0, 4, 10 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Sociodemographic characteristics
0 months
Study Arms (2)
Graphomotor intervention program
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group (EG) intervention comprises a graphomotor intervention program according to a psychomotor approach. The program integrates two group sessions (6-8 children)/week of 30 minutes for 8 weeks (16 sessions).
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group (CG) participants will maintain their normal classroom activities. After the study, control group participants will be offered the opportunity to integrate a similar graphomotor intervention program.
Interventions
The graphomotor intervention program aims to promote the development and reinforcement, different skills involved in the learning process of handwriting and has a preventive character. It follows a bodily, playful, multisensory, exploratory (sensory integration) and neuromotor task training approach and focuses on the following intervention domains: segmental awareness, passive relaxation, trunk-limb dissociation, interdigital coordination, attention, planning, spatial organization/orientation and perception.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children in the last year of preschool education (aged 5 years old);
- Participation agreement.
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed or suspected of neurological disabilities (e.g., cerebral palsy, epilepsy), psychiatric and/or behavioural disorders;
- Presence of uncorrected vision and hearing problems;
- Referenced by Special Education/National Service of Early Intervention in Childhood;
- Native language is not Portuguese;
- Children with direct intervention in graphomotor skills or who had a similar intervention to that proposed less than 1 year ago;
- Participation in the intervention program of less than 80%;
- Children undergoing drug therapy (e.g., antihistamines) that interfere with the study variables;
- Do not wish to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Helena Isabel Falcão Coradinho
Evora, 7040, Portugal
Related Publications (19)
Alhusaini AA, Melam GR, Buragadda S. Short-term sensorimotor-based intervention for handwriting performance in elementary school children. Pediatr Int. 2016 Nov;58(11):1118-1123. doi: 10.1111/ped.13004. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
PMID: 27085075BACKGROUNDSoppelsa R, Albaret JM. Caractéristiques de la dysgraphie ou du trouble de l'apprentissage de la graphomotricité (TAG) au collège. A.N.A.E. 2014 Fev; 128:1-6. Available at: http://www.psychomot.ups-tlse.fr/Soppelsa-Albaret2014.pdf
BACKGROUNDLachaux-Parker C. Troubles de l'écriture et psychomotricité. Revue francophone d'orthoptie. 2012; 5:143-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rfo.2013.02.002
BACKGROUNDBorghese NA, Palmiotto C, Essenziale J, Mainetti R, Granocchio E, Molteni B et al. Assessment of Exergames as Treatment and Prevention of Dysgraphia. In: Ibáñez J, González-Vargas J, Azorín J, Akay M, Pons J. Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation II. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 431-6.
BACKGROUNDGraham S, Harris KR. Preventing Writing Difficulties: Providing Additional Handwriting and Spelling Instruction to At-Risk Children in First Grade. Teaching Exceptional Children. 2006 May/Jun; 38(5):64-66. doi: 10.1177/004005990603800509
BACKGROUNDGraham S, Harris KR, & Fink B. Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2000; 92(4):620-33. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.620
BACKGROUNDFeder KP, Majnemer A. Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Apr;49(4):312-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00312.x.
PMID: 17376144BACKGROUNDMorin MF, Bara F, Alamargot D. Apprentissage de la graphomotricité à l'école: Quelles acquisitions? Quelles pratiques? Quels outils?. Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis. 2017 Jul; 54(1-2):47-84. Available at: https://researchgate.net/publication/204380193_Apprentissage_de_la_graphomotricite_a_l'école_Quelles_acquisitions_Quelles_pratiques_Quels_outils
BACKGROUNDZeziger P, Deonna T, Mayor C. L'acquisition de l'écriture. Enfance. 2000; 3:295-304. Available at: http://www.persee.fr/doc/enfan_0013-7545_2000_num_53_3_3186
BACKGROUNDPuranik CS, Lonigan CJ. From Scribbles to Scrabble: Preschool Children's Developing Knowledge of Written Language. Read Writ. 2011 May;24(5):567-589. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9220-8.
PMID: 22448101BACKGROUNDMarr D, Cermak S, Cohn ES, Henderson A. Fine motor activities in Head Start and kindergarten classrooms. Am J Occup Ther. 2003 Sep-Oct;57(5):550-7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.5.550.
PMID: 14527117BACKGROUNDLifshitz N, Har-Zvi S. A Comparison Between Students Who Receive and Who Do Not Receive a Writing Readiness Interventions on Handwriting Quality, Speed and Positive Reactions. Early Childhood Educ J. 2014 Jan; 43(1):47-55. doi: 10.1007/s10643-013-0629-y
BACKGROUNDDinehart L. Handwriting in early childhood education: Current research and future implications. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. 2015 Mar; 15(1):97-118. doi: 10.1177/1468798414522825
BACKGROUNDDonica D, Goins A, Wagner L. Effectiveness of Handwriting Readiness Programs on Postural Control, Hand Control, and Letter and Number Formation in Head Start Classrooms. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention. 2013 Dec; 6(2):81-93. doi: 10.1080/19411243.2013.810938
BACKGROUNDvan Hartingsveldt MJ, De Groot IJ, Aarts PB, Nijhuis-Van Der Sanden MW. Standardized tests of handwriting readiness: a systematic review of the literature. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Jun;53(6):506-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03895.x. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
PMID: 21309763BACKGROUNDBeery KE. The Developmental Test of Visual/Motor Integration. CJeveland: Modern Curriculum Press; 1982.
BACKGROUNDSpanaki I, Venetsanou F, Evaggelinou C, Skordilis E. Graphomotor skills of Greek kindergarten and elementar school children: effect of a fine motor intervention program. Comprehensive Psychology. 2014 Jan; 2(3):1-10. doi: 10.2466/01.09.IT.3.2
BACKGROUNDLust CA, Donica DK. Effectiveness of a handwriting readiness program in head start: a two-group controlled trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2011 Sep-Oct;65(5):560-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.000612.
PMID: 22026324BACKGROUNDMatias A, Vieira C. Programa de intervenção grafomotora. [In press].
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helena IF Coradinho, MSc
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2018
First Posted
October 9, 2018
Study Start
October 15, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
March 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share