Study in Pediatric Subjects With Peanut Allergy to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab as Adjunct to AR101 (Peanut Oral Immunotherapy)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study in Pediatric Subjects With Peanut Allergy to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab as Adjunct to AR101 (Peanut Oral Immunotherapy)
1 other identifier
interventional
148
1 country
25
Brief Summary
Primary objective is to assess whether dupilumab as adjunct to AR101 compared to placebo improves desensitization at the completion of up-dosing, defined as an increase in the proportion of participants who pass a post up-dosing double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at visit 16. Secondary objectives are:
- To assess whether dupilumab as adjunct to AR101 compared to placebo improves desensitization at the completion of up-dosing, defined as an increase in the cumulative tolerated dose (log transformed) of peanut protein during a post up-dosing DBPCFC at visit 16
- To assess whether dupilumab as (indefinite \[continuously\]) adjunct to AR101 compared to placebo maintains desensitization, defined as an increase in the proportion of participants who pass a post maintenance DBPCFC at visit 22
- To assess whether dupilumab as (limited \[previously\]) adjunct to AR101 compared to placebo maintains desensitization, defined as an increase in the proportion of participants who pass a post maintenance DBPCFC at visit 22
- To evaluate the safety and tolerability of dupilumab as adjunct to AR101 compared to placebo
- To assess the effect of dupilumab (compared to placebo) as adjunct to AR101 on the change in peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE), Immunoglobulin G (IgG), Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), and peanut-specific IgG4/IgE ratio
- To assess if dupilumab increases the tolerability of AR101 as measured by the daily symptoms (electronic diary \[e-diary\]) during the up-dosing phase
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Oct 2018
Typical duration for phase_2
25 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 3, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 23, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 7, 2024
CompletedFebruary 7, 2024
January 1, 2024
2 years
September 21, 2018
October 13, 2023
January 12, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Plus AR101 vs Placebo Plus AR101 Who Passed a Post Up-dosing Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC) With 2044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Visit 16 (Week 28 to 40)
Symptoms considered to be allergic were graded using the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions. The allergic reaction is measured on a 1-5 scale, with grade 1 being mild, grade 2 being moderate, grade 3 being severe, grade 4 being life threatening, and grade 5 as death. the higher the grade, the more severe the allergic reaction. Participants were considered to have passed the DBPCFC if they did not experience any objective Grade 1 reaction. Percentage of participants treated with dupilumab plus AR101 vs placebo plus AR101 who passed a post up-dosing DBPCFC with 2044 mg (Cumulative) peanut protein at Visit 16 (Week 28 to 40) was reported. Cumulative data during the specified period was calculated as the average of all available post-randomization values during the specified time period (Week 28 to Week 40).
At Visit 16 (Week 28 to 40)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Change From Baseline in Cumulative Tolerated Dose (Log Transformed) of Peanut Protein During a DBPCFC at Visit 16 (Week 28 to 40) in Participants Treated With Dupilumab Plus AR101 vs Placebo Plus AR101
Baseline, Visit 16 (Week 28 to 40)
Percentage of Participants Treated With Dupilumab Plus AR101 vs Placebo Plus AR101 Who Reached the 300 mg/Day Dose of AR101 by Visit 16 (Week 28 to 40)
At Visit 16 (Week 28 to 40)
Time From Randomization to the First Time When Participants Reached the 300 mg/Day Dose of AR101 During the Up-dosing Treatment Phase by Visit 16 (Week 28 to 40)
At Visit 16 (Week 28 to 40)
Percentage of Participants (Continuously) Treated With Dupilumab Plus AR101 vs Placebo Plus AR101 Who Passed a Post Maintenance DBPCFC With 2044 mg (Cumulative) Peanut Protein at Visit 22 (Week 52 to 64)
At Visit 22 (Week 52 to 64)
Change From Baseline in Cumulative Tolerated Dose (Log Transformed) of Peanut Protein During a DBPCFC at Visit 22 (Week 52 to 64) in Participants (Continuously) Treated With Dupilumab Plus AR101 vs Placebo Plus AR101
Baseline, Visit 22 (Week 52 to 64)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
dupilumab + AR101
EXPERIMENTALParticipant randomization of a ratio of 2 active dupilumab arms
placebo matching dupilumab + AR101
EXPERIMENTALParticipant randomization of a ratio of 1 placebo arm
Interventions
Dupilumab will be administered subcutaneously (SC) in a single-use, pre-filled glass syringe every two weeks (Q2W)
Placebo matching dupilumab is prepared in the same formulation without the addition of protein
AR101 will be provided in dose-escalating capsules and then sachets during maintenance phase
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Experience dose-limiting symptoms at or before the challenge dose of peanut protein on screening and not experiencing dose-limiting symptoms to placebo as defined in the protocol
- Serum Immunoglobulin E (IgE) to peanut of ≥10 kUA/L and/or a skin prick test (SPT) to peanut ≥8 mm compared to a negative control
- Participants/legal guardians must be trained on the proper use of the epinephrine autoinjector device to be allowed to enroll in the study
- Participants with other known food allergies must agree to eliminate these other food items from their diet so as not to confound the safety and efficacy data from the study
You may not qualify if:
- History of other chronic disease (other than asthma, Atopic Dermatitis (AD), or allergic rhinitis) requiring therapy (eg, heart disease, diabetes, hypertension) that would represent a risk to participant's health or safety in this study or ability to comply with study protocol
- History of frequent or recent severe, life-threatening episode of anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock
- History of eosinophilic Gastrointestinal (GI) disease
- Asthma at time of enrollment with any of the following:
- Forced Expiratory Volume 1 Second (FEV1) \<80% of predicted or ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) \<75% of predicted with or without controller medications
- Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) dosing of daily fluticasone (or equivalent ICS based on NHLBI dosing chart)
- One hospitalization in the past year for asthma
- Emergency room visit for asthma within 6 months prior to screening
- Use of systemic corticosteroids within 2 months prior to screening
- Use of other forms of allergen immunotherapy or immunomodulatory therapy within 3 months prior to screening
- Use of any agents known or likely to interact with epinephrine (eg, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitors, tri-cyclic antidepressants, or other drugs), within 3 weeks prior to screening
- Allergy to oat (placebo in DBPCFC)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticalslead
- Sanoficollaborator
- Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (25)
Regeneron Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85724, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Mission Viejo, California, 92691, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Mountain View, California, 94040, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Rolling Hills Estates, California, 90274, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, 80206, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Marietta, Georgia, 30144, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Ocean Township, New Jersey, 07712, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Great Neck, New York, 11021, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Seattle, Washington, 98115, United States
Related Publications (1)
Ghelli C, Costanzo G, Canonica GW, Heffler E, Paoletti G. New evidence in food allergies treatment. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Aug 1;24(4):251-256. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000999. Epub 2024 May 30.
PMID: 38814736DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Trials Administrator
- Organization
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Trial Management
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2018
First Posted
September 25, 2018
Study Start
October 3, 2018
Primary Completion
October 16, 2020
Study Completion
July 23, 2021
Last Updated
February 7, 2024
Results First Posted
February 7, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01