The Effectiveness of Combining Physical Exercise and Cognitive Training for Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a syndrome defined as an intermediate stage between cognitively intact and clinically diagnosed dementia. The progression rate from MCI to dementia ranges from 10 to 15% each year, resulting in increased family care and medical expenses. Therefore, providing effective interventions are necessary. Combining cognitive training and physical exercise training appears to have effects to prevent the progression of MCI to Alzheimer's disease or other severe cognitive impairment. It was proposed that cognitively challenging stimulations can increase the neural network and promote neural plasticity, which are essential for preventing cognitive decline in patients with MCI. The studies also showed that physical exercise induces positive effects on cerebral blood flow and induces brain activation changes of the frontal, parietal, and temporal areas; these cortical areas are especially important for memory and other cognitive functions. However, it is yet not clear the appropriate frequency of the effective intervention for patients with MCI. Thus, this study aims to compare the intervention effects of high frequency sequential and low frequency sequential training for patients with MCI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2022
CompletedMay 17, 2021
May 1, 2021
4.3 years
July 23, 2018
May 13, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Change scores of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was designed as a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Time to administer the MoCA is approximately 10 minutes. The total possible score is 30 points; a score of 26 or above is considered normal.
baseline, posttest (around 12 weeks after baseline), follow-up (6 months after completing intervention sessions)
Change scores of the Stroop test
The Stroop test will be used to assess the processing speed, inhibition, set-shifting, and selective attention abilities. The participants will be tested under 2 conditions: congruent and incongruent conditions. In the congruent condition, the color ink of a word is consistent with the written color name; while the color ink differs from the written color name under the incongruent condition.
baseline, posttest (around 12 weeks after baseline), follow-up (6 months after completing intervention sessions)
Change scores of the Dual-task test
The dual-task tests will be assessed to determine the ability for an individual to perform 2 tasks simultaneously. The investigators will assess the dual-task performance during walking and performing box and block test. The results of the dual-task tests will provide information regarding to whether the 2 tasks compete for the same class of neural resources or one of the tasks can be carried out automatically
baseline, posttest (around 12 weeks after baseline), follow-up (6 months after completing intervention sessions)
Change scores of the Timed up and go (TUG) test
The TUG test will be used to assess the mobility and dynamic balance ability. The participants will be required to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, then walk back to the chair, and sit down. The time to complete the TUG test has been shown to be a good indicator to detect potential fallers and frail elderly (Podsiadlo \& Richardson, 1991). The test-retest reliability of TUG on individuals with cognitive impairment was excellent.
baseline, posttest (around 12 weeks after baseline), follow-up (6 months after completing intervention sessions)
Change scores of the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS)
Tests of the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) will be used to measure the memory functions of an individual. The WMS have high reliability and validity, and is often used to differentiate individuals with memory deficits and those with intact cognitive functions. In addition, WMS could be used to assess cognitive improvements after an intervention or treatment. There are eight Primary Indexes (Auditory Immediate (was Verbal), Visual Immediate (was Visual), Immediate Memory (new), Auditory Delayed (new), Visual Delayed (new), Auditory Reception Delayed (new), General Memory (only delayed subtest scores), and Working Memory), which constitute Immediate Memory, General (Delayed) Memory, and Working Memory (was Attention/Concentration). Approximately 60 to 90 minutes is required for completion.
baseline, posttest (around 12 weeks after baseline), follow-up (6 months after completing intervention sessions)
Change scores of the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Assess activities of daily living. There are 8 domains of function measured with the Lawton IADL scale, including ability to use phone,shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundering, mode of transportation, responsibility for own medications,and ability to handle finances. A summary score ranges from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 (high function, independent). For each category, circle the item description that most closely resembles the client's highest functional level (either 0 or 1).
baseline, posttest (around 12 weeks after baseline), follow-up (6 months after completing intervention sessions)
Change scores of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)
Subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) will be used to measure the cognitive functions of an individual. The WAIS have high reliability and validity, and is often used to differentiate individuals with cognitive deficits and those with intact cognitive functions. In addition, WAIS could be used to assess cognitive improvements after an intervention or treatment.
baseline, posttest (around 12 weeks after baseline), follow-up (6 months after completing intervention sessions)
Change scores of Memory complaint questionnaire
The MAC-Q consists of six items. The first five items relate to specific situations that are frequently reported as troublesome for those with declining memory, and the last item broadly measures overall self-perceived memory decline. Respondents must choose one of the 5 options ranging from much better now to much worse now. The total possible score is 30 points.
baseline, posttest (around 12 weeks after baseline), follow-up (6 months after completing intervention sessions)
Change scores of Spatial Span Test
The Spatial Span Task is a behavioral measure of working memory capacity, the cognitive ability to store and manage information on a transient basis. On each trial the squares change from white to a different color in a sequence with variable orders and colors. The task exists with two variants: forward-span and backward-span. In the forward-span variant, at the end of each list participants attempt to recall the squares in the order they changed color by typing keys corresponding to each square via keypress. In the backward-span variant, at the end of each list participants attempt to recall the squares in the reverse order that they changed color. The difficulty level is systematically increased by varying the number of boxes on each trial from two boxes (easiest) to nine boxes (most difficult).
baseline, posttest (around 12 weeks after baseline), follow-up (6 months after completing intervention sessions)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change scores of the short form of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-SF)
baseline, posttest (around 12 weeks after baseline), follow-up (6 months after completing intervention sessions)
Change scores of the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ)
baseline, posttest (around 12 weeks after baseline), follow-up (6 months after completing intervention sessions)
Change scores of the Everyday Cognition scales (ECog)-12 items
baseline, posttest (around 12 weeks after baseline), follow-up (6 months after completing intervention sessions)
Study Arms (2)
Sequential training-high frequency
EXPERIMENTALThe participants of HF will receive a total of 36 training sessions, and each session will contain 90-105 minutes of training. The participants in this group will first perform 45-55 minutes of physical exercise followed by 45-50 minutes of cognitive training. The participants in this group participate in multimodel exercise programs including aerobic exercise, balance, and strength training. The entire program will contain 5-10 minutes of warm-up, 35-40 minutes of physical exercise, and 5 minutes of cool-down. Then, the participants will practice tasks that involve the abilities of visuospatial processing, attention, memory, language, and/or executive functions for 45-50 minutes.
Sequential training-low frequency
EXPERIMENTALThe participants of LF will receive a total of 12 training sessions, and each session will contain 90-105 minutes of training. The participants in this group will first perform 45-55 minutes of physical exercise followed by 45-50 minutes of cognitive training. The participants in this group participate in multimodel exercise programs including aerobic exercise, balance, and strength training. The entire program will contain 5-10 minutes of warm-up, 35-40 minutes of physical exercise, and 5 minutes of cool-down. Then, the participants will practice tasks that involve the abilities of visuospatial processing, attention, memory, language, and/or executive functions for 45-50 minutes.
Interventions
For cognitive training, the BrainHQ program, self-made teaching aids and board games will be used to train different cognitive functions of the participants. For physical exercise, we design the programs that involve balance or strength training components in the aerobic exercises. All participants will first perform 60 minutes of physical exercise followed by 60 minutes of cognitive training.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- able to follow instruction (MMSE\>= 17)
- self- or informant-reported memory or cognitive complaint.
You may not qualify if:
- recent myocardial infarction,heart failure,recent heart surgery,
- severe asthma, concomitant with other neurological disorders, or joint deformity that might prevents them performing exercise or cognitive training.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan District, 333, Taiwan
Related Publications (2)
Chuang IC, Chen IC, Wu YR, Li KY. Prediction and mediation analysis for treatment responses to combined cognitive and physical training for older adults. Sci Rep. 2024 May 8;14(1):10571. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61407-6.
PMID: 38720025DERIVEDChuang IC, Chen IC, Su KH, Wu YR, Wu CY. The effects of high versus low frequency of combined physical and cognitive training on cognitive function in older adults with cognitive decline: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Geriatr. 2023 Feb 14;23(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03802-8.
PMID: 36788482DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ching-yi Wu, ScD
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2018
First Posted
August 8, 2018
Study Start
January 30, 2018
Primary Completion
June 1, 2022
Study Completion
June 1, 2022
Last Updated
May 17, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05