Simulation Training of Closed-Loop Communication (CLC)
Does Simulation Enhance Closed-Loop Communication in the Clinical Setting of a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit?
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Open interventional before and after study on the effect of on-site full-scale simulation with a subsequent course follow-up and a three month follow-up observation pertaining to behavioural changes in communication of the paediatric intensive care unit staff that is participating in the on-site simulation training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 25, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2018
CompletedJuly 26, 2018
July 1, 2018
9 months
June 28, 2018
July 24, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Measurement of difference regarding employment of Closed-Loop communications measured by counting the call-outs for each participant in a defined timeframe in Phase I, II and III of the study
measurement of difference regarding the employment of Closed-Loop Communication in the clinical setting after three months of the simulation training focusing on crisis resource management (CRM) in communication and assessed by external raters and compared to baseline before such training. Based on a study by Härgestam et al. (2013) we classified the call-outs as command (com), question (que), observation (obs) or suggestion (sug). Furthermore, after our experience during the pilot phase we added the category information (inf), since we could not sort a number of call-outs into the existing four categories
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Rate of Closed-Loop Communication measured by counting the call-outs for each participant in a defined timeframe in Phase I, II and III of the study
3 months
Measurement of difference regarding employment of Closed-Loop communications measured by counting the reaction to call-outs for each participant in a defined timeframe in Phase I, II and III of the study
3 months
Rate of Closed-Loop Communication measured by counting the reactions to call-outs for each participant in a defined timeframe in Phase I, II and III of the study
3 months
Study Arms (1)
Pediatric intensive care unit-nurses
OTHERPhase I: During the month leading up to the simulation two trained observers / raters will observe the rate of Closed-Loop Communication in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) among study participants. Intervention phase: Study participants will be subjected to on-site simulation training focusing on communication, including CRM and non-technical skills in the PICU setting. Phase II + III: During the follow up phase, trained raters will again observe the study-participating PICU staff relative to their communication behaviour in the month following simulation training (Phase II) and again three months later (Phase III).
Interventions
Intervention phase: Study participants will be subjected to on-site simulation training focusing on communication, including CRM and non-technical skills in the PICU setting.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Employees, with written informed consent, working in the paediatric intensive care unit of the Children's Bern University Hospital
- Employees novices to in-situ simulation
You may not qualify if:
- employees, working in the paediatric intensive care unit of the Children's Bern University Hospital who are not fluent in German or Swiss German.
- employees, working in the paediatric intensive care unit of the Children's Bern University Hospital who are unable to be observed during phases I and II and during the follow up phase (see below).
- No vulnerable participants will be included.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Bern
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Ulmer FF, Lutz AM, Muller F, Riva T, Butikofer L, Greif R. Communication Patterns During Routine Patient Care in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: The Behavioral Impact of In Situ Simulation. J Patient Saf. 2022 Mar 1;18(2):e573-e579. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000872.
PMID: 34224500DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Thomas Riva, MD
University of Bern
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2018
First Posted
July 26, 2018
Study Start
April 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2017
Study Completion
January 25, 2018
Last Updated
July 26, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07