Impact of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warnings
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warnings on Purchases
2 other identifiers
interventional
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) like sodas, sports drinks, and fruit drinks remains a pressing public health concern in the United States. Consumption of SSBs remains well above recommended levels, and has been linked to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. In response, policymakers across the U.S. have proposed requiring warning messages on SSB containers to inform the public and reduce consumption to healthier levels. While online studies find that such warnings reduce intentions to purchase SSBs, no studies have yet examined the impact of warnings on actual consumer behavior. The purpose of this randomized trial is to determine whether health warnings on sugar-sweetened beverages are more effective than control labels at reducing purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages. The trial will take place in a mock convenience store. Participants will be randomly assigned to a health warnings arm in which all sugar-sweetened beverages in the store are labeled with a health warning, or to a control arm in which all sugar-sweetened beverages in the store are labeled with a neutral label. Participants will select items to purchase with cash, and purchases will be compared across trial arms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 11, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 19, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 10, 2021
CompletedMarch 30, 2021
March 1, 2021
4 months
April 18, 2018
February 16, 2021
March 9, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Number of Calories (kcal) Purchased From Sugar-sweetened Beverages
The primary outcome is calories of sugar-sweetened beverages purchased during the shopping task. Calories from sugar-sweetened beverage purchases is defined as the total number of calories from sugar-sweetened beverages in the participant's basket when they complete the shopping task, calculated as the sum of calories/container for all SSB containers. Purchases will be recorded by the experimenter immediately after the participant completes the \~10-minute shopping task.
At completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Mean Number of Calories (kcal) Purchased From All Foods and Beverages
At completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Percent of Participants Who Purchase a Sugar-sweetened Beverage
At completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Number of Sugar-sweetened Beverages Purchased
At completion of ~10 minute shopping task
Mean Intentions Score to Limit Consumption of Beverages Added Sugar
Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Intentions Sore to Limit Consumption of Specific Sugar-sweetened Beverages
Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
Mean Injunctive Norms Score Regarding Consumption of Beverages With Added Sugar
Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Perceived Message Effectiveness of Trial Label
Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
Mean Support for Sugar-sweetened Beverage Health Warning Labels Score
Within 30 minutes following completion of ~10-minute shopping task
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Label
EXPERIMENTALNeutral Label
OTHERInterventions
Labels with a health warning will be applied to the front-of-package of all sugar-sweetened beverage containers in the mock store. Investigators developed the text and design of these labels based on previous research and on designs described in US and international legislation.
Neutral labels will be applied to the front-of-package of all sugar-sweetened beverage containers in the mock store. Investigators developed the design of these labels.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Consume at least 12oz/week of sugar-sweetened beverages during the past month
- Be able to read and speak English
You may not qualify if:
- Under the age of 18 years
- Consume less than 12 ounces/week of sugar-sweetened beverages during the past month
- Unable to read or speak English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Related Publications (9)
Bollard T, Maubach N, Walker N, Ni Mhurchu C. Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people's predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: an experimental study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Sep 1;13(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0421-7.
PMID: 27580589BACKGROUNDRoberto CA, Wong D, Musicus A, Hammond D. The Influence of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning Labels on Parents' Choices. Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20153185. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3185. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
PMID: 26768346BACKGROUNDZoellner J, Estabrooks PA, Davy BM, Chen YC, You W. Exploring the theory of planned behavior to explain sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Mar-Apr;44(2):172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
PMID: 22154130BACKGROUNDNonnemaker, J., Farrelly, M., Kamyab, K., Busey, A., & Mann, N. (2010). Experimental study of graphic cigarette warning labels. Final Results Report. RTI Project, 7. Accessed March 20, 2018. Available at: http://www.tobaccolabels.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/USA-2010-Experimental-Study-of-Graphic-Cigarette-Warning-Labels-Final-Results-Report-and-Appendices-FDA.pdf
BACKGROUNDMoodie C, MacKintosh AM, Hammond D. Adolescents' response to text-only tobacco health warnings: results from the 2008 UK Youth Tobacco Policy Survey. Eur J Public Health. 2010 Aug;20(4):463-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp199. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
PMID: 19959613BACKGROUNDKlein WM, Zajac LE, Monin MM. Worry as a moderator of the association between risk perceptions and quitting intentions in young adult and adult smokers. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38(3):256-61. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9143-2.
PMID: 20049660BACKGROUNDFathelrahman AI, Omar M, Awang R, Cummings KM, Borland R, Bin Mohd Samin AS. Impact of the new Malaysian cigarette pack warnings on smokers' awareness of health risks and interest in quitting smoking. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Nov;7(11):4089-99. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7114089. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
PMID: 21139879BACKGROUNDBrewer NT, Jeong M, Mendel JR, Hall MG, Zhang D, Parada H Jr, Boynton MH, Noar SM, Baig SA, Morgan JC, Ribisl KM. Cigarette pack messages about toxic chemicals: a randomised clinical trial. Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):74-80. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054112. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
PMID: 29654122BACKGROUNDGrummon AH, Taillie LS, Golden SD, Hall MG, Ranney LM, Brewer NT. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warnings and Purchases: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Prev Med. 2019 Nov;57(5):601-610. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.06.019. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
PMID: 31586510DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anna Grummon, PhD
- Organization
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna H Grummon, MSPH
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- This trial uses incomplete disclosure to mask the purpose of the trial from participants.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2018
First Posted
April 30, 2018
Study Start
May 11, 2018
Primary Completion
September 19, 2018
Study Completion
September 19, 2018
Last Updated
March 30, 2021
Results First Posted
March 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03