COMparison of Portable Fingertip Versus Conventional Pulse OximeteRs Trial
COMFORT
Perioperative Comparison of the Agreement Between a Portable Fingertip Pulse Oximeter Versus Conventional Bedside Pulse Oximeter in Adult Patients
1 other identifier
observational
220
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Perioperative non-invasive measurement of a patient's peripheral arterial oxygen saturation has become an accepted standard of care endorsed by anaesthesiologists and their regulatory bodies throughout the world. Pulse oximeters are an integral item on the World Health Organisation's Surgical Safety Checklist which is performed prior to the commencement of every surgical procedure. They are also utilised by other medical professionals and patients in various scenarios. When compared to conventional bedside pulse oximeters, portable fingertip devices have the advantages of cost-effectiveness, high portability, ease of use and battery operation. A review of recent literature reveals a paucity of accuracy studies in adult patients with various comorbidities in the clinical setting. Most data has been obtained under ideal laboratory conditions utilizing healthy adult volunteers. This study aims to pragmatically investigate the performance of a portable fingertip pulse oximeter in adult patients in a hospital setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedFebruary 21, 2019
February 1, 2019
2 months
January 20, 2018
February 20, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Saturation measurement agreement
Bland-Altman analysis of saturation measurement pairs, with a priori acceptable limits of agreement (1.96 x SD measurement differences) within 3%. This is in accordance with ISO and FDA guidelines for testing of these devices (see relevant standard).
1 minute
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Average root mean square difference
1 minute
Skin tone effect
1 minute
Perfusion (pulse magnitude) effect on oximeter agreement
1 minute
Study Arms (1)
All patients
All patients enrolled in trial will have peripheral oxygen saturation simultaneously recorded with both study devices on non-adjacent (second and fourth) fingers of the same hand.
Interventions
Peripheral arterial oxygen saturation recording with both study devices
Eligibility Criteria
All adult surgical patients presenting for elective or emergency surgery within an academic teaching hospital. Patients will have measurements made in the perioperative period in areas where conventional monitoring of pulse oximetery occurs, such as anaesthesia preassessment areas, induction rooms, operating theatres, recovery areas, ICU and PAHCU.
You may qualify if:
- Adult surgical patients presenting for elective or emergency surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Contact precautions due to high risk of transmissable infectious disease
- Significant hypotension or hypoperfusion (systolic blood pressure \<80 mmHg, or hypothermia)
- Motion artefacts due to excessive patient movements
- Known presence of variant haemoglobin species (eg. carboxy- or methaemoglobin)
- Intraoperative dye use (eg. methylene blue or indocyanine green)
- Nail polish or black henna
- Tape or bandages over the fingers
- Absent/inadequate pulse oximetry tracing on existing monitor
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Groote Schuur Hospital
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7925, South Africa
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ross Hofmeyr, FCA(SA)
University of Cape Town
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Dept Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2018
First Posted
April 12, 2018
Study Start
April 15, 2018
Primary Completion
June 11, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
February 21, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Upon publication of the study, to remain available indefinitely.
- Access Criteria
- Open access after publication
Raw study data will be uploaded to an open sharing platform (www.researchgate.org or similar) after publication of the study.