The Nicotinic Cholinergic System and Cognitive Aging
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prior research has shown that a chemical system in the brain called the cholinergic system is primarily responsible for cognitive symptoms seen in people with dementia. While therapeutic benefits are clear in dementia, what remains uncertain is the role that the cholinergic system in general and a subset of receptors called the nicotinic system plays in cognition in healthy non-demented older adults (referred to as normal cognitive aging). This is critical because the ever growing healthy aging population will show declines in cognition that fall short of dementia but still impact functional abilities and independence. Maintaining good nicotinic system functioning throughout adulthood may lessen the cognitive symptoms of aging. At this time, it is not clear what the biological cause of age-related changes in cognition is. This study will examine the role of the nicotinic system in the healthy aging brain and examine its role in memory and thinking processes in older and younger adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Oct 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 24, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2022
CompletedMay 9, 2023
May 1, 2023
5.2 years
January 3, 2018
May 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Age effects of nicotinic blockade
Examine the effects of nicotinic blockade compared to placebo on the relationship between working memory performance and brain activation using fMRI BOLD signal in older and younger adults.
After the completion of the third study day.
Age effects of nicotinic stimulation
Examine the effects of nicotinic stimulation compared to placebo on the relationship between working memory performance and brain activation using fMRI BOLD signal in older and younger adults.
After the completion of the third study day.
Study Arms (2)
Older Adults
EXPERIMENTALHealthy adults aged 65-75 will participate in three study days where they are randomly assigned to receive either nicotine patch, oral mecamylamine, placebo and perform a working memory task during the fMRI. BOLD signal is the outcome measure.
Younger Adults
EXPERIMENTALHealthy adults aged 18-30 will participate in three study days where they are randomly assigned to receive either nicotine patch, oral mecamylamine, or placebo and perform a working memory task during the fMRI.BOLD signal is the outcome measure.
Interventions
Each participant randomly receives one active drug or placebo on each of three study days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Normal cognition, not demented, no mild cognitive impairment. IQ greater than 80.
You may not qualify if:
- Current use of barbiturates, rifampin, insulin, carbamezepine, oral hypoglycemics, antidepressants, diabetes, or untreated thyroid disease.
- Current use of centrally active drugs and drugs with cholinergic properties. A minimum of 14 days will elapse between discontinuing centrally active or psychoactive agents and this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Vermontlead
- Vanderbilt University Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Vermont
Burlington, Vermont, 05401, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julie A Dumas, Ph.D.
University of Vermont
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This is a double blind study. The PI and all study personnel are blinded. Only the pharmacist dispensing the medication and the biostatistician who created the counterbalancing order are unblended.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2018
First Posted
January 24, 2018
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2021
Study Completion
January 31, 2022
Last Updated
May 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05