Using Teleneuropsychology to Optimize Cognition in Healthy Aging: the Web-based Breakfast Game
Training Executive Control in Cognitively Healthy Aging: the Web-based Breakfast Game
2 other identifiers
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Executive control processes involve initiate, coordinate, synchronize, and regulate elemental cognitive functions for the conduct of goal-directed behavior. The proposed research investigates whether exposure to a web-based training protocol designed to enhance executive control processes will improve cognitive performance in cognitively healthy older adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 17, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 19, 2026
CompletedMarch 19, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.5 years
July 25, 2022
February 23, 2026
March 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Changes in the Breakfast Game Performance: Number of Tables Set Score
Change in the total number of tables set. In the computerized task, participants are asked to set tables for four guests. When finished, one point is given. Higher scores represent a better outcome. This metric represents a change in the score = the higher means improvement in the performance. The total score ranges between 0 and 12; the total change score ranged from -3 to +3.
Assessed at training session 1, week 1; training session 12, approximately 6 weeks. Data is reported for the change between session 1 and 12
Changes in the Breakfast Game Performance: Cooking Time Range of Stop Times Scores
Change in cooking time (milliseconds) between food items. In the computerized task, participants are asked to cook different food types. Scores reflect the difference between the first and last food item that was stopped cooking. Lower scores (closest to zero) represent a better outcome. This metric represents a change in the score = the lower means improvement on the performance. The total score ranges between 0.3 and 315; the total change score ranges from -40 to +40.
Assessed at training session 1, week 1; training session 12, approximately 6 weeks. Data is reported for the change between session 1 and 12
Change in Breakfast Game Performance: Cooking Time Discrepancy Scores
Change in cooking time (milliseconds) in each food type. In the computerized task, participants are asked to cook different food types. Scores reflect the average absolute values of the difference between the required and actual cooking time of each item. Lower scores (closest to zero) represent a better outcome. This metric represents a change in the score = the lower means improvement in the performance. The total score ranges between 0.3 and 175; The total change score ranges from -20 to +20.
Assessed at training session 1, week 1; training session 12, approximately 6 weeks. Data is reported for the change between session 1 and 12
Transfer to Complex Executive/Attention Control Measure (Proximal Outcome).
Accuracy on the Alphanumeric Task. This metric represents a change in the score. The higher the means more improvement in the performance. The total change score ranged from -0.1 to +0.1
Within the 2 weeks before intervention starts; and the 6th week, after the last (12th) training session. (Measure represent change between pre and post training)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Transfer to Executive Functions Composite Z-Score (Distal Outcome)
Within the 2 weeks before intervention starts; and the 6th week, after the last (12th) training session. (Measure represent change between pre and post training)
Transfer to the General Self-efficacy Scale (Distal Outcome)
Within the 2 weeks before intervention starts; and the 6th week, after the last (12th) training session. (Measure represent change between pre and post training)
Transfer to Beck Depression Inventory (Distal Outcome)
Within the 2 weeks before intervention starts; and the 6th week, after the last (12th) training session. (Measure represent change between pre and post training)
Transfer to Beck Anxiety Inventory (Distal Outcome)
Within the 2 weeks before intervention starts, and the 6th week, after the last (13th) training session. (Measure represent the change between pre and post training)
Transfer to Cognition-Leisure Questionnaire (Distal Outcome)
Within the 2 weeks before intervention starts, and the 6th week, after the last (12th) training session. (Measure represent the change between pre and post training)
Study Arms (2)
Strategy Training
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will play the Breakfast Game with training strategy.
Regular Approach
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will play the Breakfast Game without training strategy.
Interventions
Participants will undergo a web-based training protocol where they will play an online game that simulates a breakfast environment and will perform everyday activities as "cooking" and "setting tables" in a multi-tasking fashion. Participants will learn to play the game using specific strategies, in order to optimize the performance.
Participants will undergo a web-based training protocol where they will play an online game that simulates a breakfast environment and will perform everyday activities as "cooking" and "setting tables" in a multi-tasking fashion. Participants will learn to play the game under regular game instructions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 60-75
- Willingness to adhere to training protocol
- Adequate English proficiency
You may not qualify if:
- Low test scores (below 26 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment)
- Known history of cognitive impairment, dementia, stroke, seizure disorder, or other neuropsychiatric condition judged to impact cognitive performance.
- Taking medications known to influence cognitive performance.
- Sensory (e.g. visual, auditory) or physical (e.g. severe arthritic, orthopedic, neurologic) impairment incompatible with use of a standard computer workstation.
- Enrolled in a concurrent study that could affect the outcome of this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
- Columbia Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Sharon Sanz Simon
- Organization
- Columbia University (previous); Rutgers University (current)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sharon Sanz Simon, PhD
Columbia University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants will not be aware of the difference across the two conditions.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2022
First Posted
August 18, 2022
Study Start
January 17, 2023
Primary Completion
July 30, 2024
Study Completion
July 30, 2024
Last Updated
March 19, 2026
Results First Posted
March 19, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be available within 6 months of study completion.
- Access Criteria
- Data access requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator.
De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.