Resistance Training and Sarcopenic Obesity Elderly Women
Effect of Resistance Training on Body Composition, Functional Capacity, Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Sarcopenic Obesity Elderly Women: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
37
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
In this manuscript, we investigated the effect of resistance training (RT) on body composition, functional capacity, inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers in sarcopenic obesity elderly women, using a randomized controlled trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2017
CompletedDecember 14, 2017
December 1, 2017
4 months
November 29, 2017
December 12, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change in body composition
To assess total and appendicular lean soft-tissue (LST), and total body fat (in kg), whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry DXA (Lunar Prodigy, model NRL 41990, GE Lunar, Madison, WI) was used.
baseline and 12 weeks
Change in muscular strength
Functional capacity was evaluated using measures of muscular strength (total strength) by 1RM test assessed in the chest press (CP), knee extension (KE), and preacher curl (PC) exercises, performed in this exact order.The 1RM was recorded as the final load lifted in which the subject was able to complete only one single maximal execution. Total strength was determined by the sum of the 3 exercises and express in Kg.
baseline and 12 weeks
Change in inflammatory biomarkers
Measurements of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and Interluekin-6 (IL-6), were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), according to the specifications of the manufacturer (Quantikine High Sensitivity Kit, R\&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and performed in a microplate reader Perkin Elmer, model EnSpire (Waltham, MA, USA). The results are presented in picograms per milliliter (pg/ml). All samples were determined in duplicate to guarantee the precision of the results.
baseline and 12 weeks
Change in oxidative stress biomarkers
For the oxidative stress measurements, advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) were determined in the plasma using a semiautomatic method described by Witko-Sarsat et al. (Witko-Sarsat et al., 1996). AOPP concentrations are expressed as micromoles per liter (μmol/L) of chloramines-T equivalents.
baseline and 12 weeks
Change in functional capacity
Functional capacity was evaluated using measures of muscular strength (total strength), the 10-m walk test (10MW) and rising from sitting position test (RSP) express in (s). For the 10MW test older women were required to walk the distance of 10 m rapidly to evaluate the displacement speed; for the RSP, they were required to get up and sit down from a chair five times consecutively. In both tests the timer was triggered after the command "start now". At the moment the task was completed the timer was stopped.
baseline and 12 weeks
Change in insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1)
The concentrations of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), were obtained in a specialized laboratory by a chemiluminescence method using a Liaison XL Immunoassay Analyzer (DiaSorin S.p.A, Saluggia, Italy). The values are expressed in (µU/mL)
baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in C-reative protein (CRP)
baseline and 12 weeks
Changes in Anthropometry Parameters
baseline and 12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
experimental intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe training group performed the resistance training (RT) program. All participants were personally supervised by physical education professionals with substantial RT experience. The sessions were performed 3 times per week on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, wirh 3 sets of 10-15 repetition maximums (RM).The RT program was performed in the following order: chest press, seated row, triceps pushdown, preacher curl, horizontal leg press, knee extension, leg curl, , and seated calf raise. Participants were afforded a 1 to 2 min rest interval between sets and 2 to 3 min between each exercise. The training load was consistent with the prescribed number of repetitions for the three sets of each exercise.
control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group did not perform any type of physical exercise during the intervention period.
Interventions
Participants from TG performed program, executed in 3 sets of 10-15RM, 3 times per week on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. The RT program was composed of 8 exercises comprising one exercise with free weights and seven with machines performed in the following order: chest press, horizontal leg press, seated row, knee extension, preacher curl (free weights), leg curl, triceps pushdown, and seated calf raise. All participants were personally supervised by physical education professionals with substantial RT experience to help ensure consistent and safe exercise performance. Participants were instructed to inhale during the eccentric phase and exhale during the concentric phase while maintaining a constant velocity of movement at a ratio of approximately 1:2 seconds (concentric and eccentric phases, respectively). Participants were afforded 1 to 2 min of rest between sets and 2 to 3 min between each exercise. The average duration of each session lasted approximately 50-60 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old or more;
- presented sarcopenic obesity SO \[which was defined by the simultaneous presence of sarcopenia and obesity (Batsis et al., 2015; Studenski et al., 2014), whereas women were considered sarcopenic if appendicular lean soft tissue (LST) \<15.02 kg, and obese if percentage of body fat ≥ 35% (Batsis et al., 2015)\];
- physically independent;
- free from cardiac or orthopedic dysfunction;
- not receiving hormonal replacement and/or thyroid therapy;
- not using equipment that would compromise the accomplishment of protocols and tests;
- not performing any regular physical exercise more than once a week over the six months preceding the beginning of the investigation.
You may not qualify if:
- individuals with any metallic implant or artificial pacemaker, who had undergone surgery, who were unable to perform the tests and trainings;
- volunteers who failed the medical examination for any reason;
- refused or were unable to give consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2017
First Posted
December 12, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 14, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share