Two Resistance Training Protocols to Reduce the Risk of Falls in Parkinson's Disease
Power Training to Reduce Falls in Parkinson's Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
53
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder that is characterized by a multitude of symptoms. Impairments in balance, muscle deficits and increased risk of falls are commonly experienced in PD.The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of two different resistance training programs on improving balance and muscular strength to thereby reduce the risk of falls in those with PD. This study will randomize individuals to one of two groups, a power training group, or a strength training group. Both interventional groups will participate in 12 weeks of resistance training, two times per week for an hour each exercise session.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 17, 2020
March 1, 2020
10 months
June 16, 2015
March 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Lean-and-Release Perturbation Technique.
This measure will require participants to be in a forward static lean at a maximum lean angle of 20 degrees from the vertical. This measure will induce a fall like situation where participants will be required to respond to this "perturbation" as they would in a slip or a trip scenario in real life. Muscle activity will be collected through surface electromyography (sEMG) to measure muscular responses associated with the perturbation. Measurement of postural adjustments will be made on an electronic carpet. sEMG and postural adjustments will demonstrate participants' onset of muscular activation time, latency to stepping, movement speed, and stepping characteristics.
Change in muscle activity, compensatory postural responses from baseline to 12 weeks.
Lean-and-Release Perturbation Technique.
Change in muscle activity, compensatory postural responses from 12 weeks to three month wash out
Lean-and-Release Perturbation Technique.
Change in muscle activity, compensatory postural responses from 12 weeks to six month wash out
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (UPDRS III)
Change in motor severity from baseline to 12 weeks
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (UPDRS III)
Change in motor severity from 12 weeks to three month wash out
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (UPDRS III)
Change in motor severity from 12 weeks to six month wash out
Gait Measurement
Changes in gait measures from baseline to 12 weeks
Gait Measurement
Changes in gait measures from 12 weeks to three month wash out
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Parkinson's disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ-39)
Change in score from baseline to 12 weeks
CHAMPS Questionnaire
Changes in score from baseline to 12 weeks
CHAMPS Questionnaire
Changes in score from 12 weeks three month wash out
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants randomized to this group will come in for testing at pre-intervention, post-intervention, three month wash out and six month wash out. Participants will be asked to continue their activities of daily living. To account for any physical activity changes over the length of the study the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) questionnaire will be administered to all individuals. A control group is necessary to compare to show normal disease progression over the length of the study as well as to demonstrate that improvements in outcome measures are due to the interventions and not practice effects.
Strength Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndividuals randomized to this program will complete three sets of eight to ten repetitions at 70% of their predicted 1-RM for each of the exercises mentioned above. The speed of the movements in this program will be two to three seconds each for the concentric and eccentric components. When participants are able to complete ten repetitions in their third set for two consecutive days, weight will be increased for the following session by 5% of the current weight that they are at in accordance with Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) and American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines. Participants will complete a total of 24 sessions over the course of 12 weeks, two times per week for an hour each session.
Power Training
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to this program will complete three sets of 12 to 15 repetitions completed at 40% of predicted 1-RM for each exercises. The concentric part of the movement will be completed as fast as possible, whereas the eccentric component will be accomplished in two to three seconds. The load in this group is lower as it has been shown that by performing power training at lighter loads, the muscles are able to be activated, throughout the entire concentric component, while maintaining a consistent level of force. The progression will be determined through the same means as the conventional strength training group. Participants will complete a total of 24 sessions over 12 weeks, twice per week for an hour each session
Interventions
Resistance training has been shown to improve balance and muscle weakness in those with PD as well as reducing the number of falls experienced, albeit not significantly. However to date no study has investigated forms of resistance training in the same study. To disentangle which form of resistance training might be more effective at reducing the risk of falls, improving balance and muscle strength, the proposed study will compare power training and conventional strength training.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with idiopathic PD by a Neurologist
- Able to stand two minutes, unassisted
- Able to understand English instructions
- Signed Physical Activity Readiness Medical Examination (PARmed-X) by physician
You may not qualify if:
- a neurological disease other than PD
- peripheral neuropathy
- physical impairments that would prevent participation in the muscular strength testing
- uncontrolled hypertension
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sunlife Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre- Wilfrid Laurier University
Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3C5, Canada
Related Publications (6)
Glendinning DS, Enoka RM. Motor unit behavior in Parkinson's disease. Phys Ther. 1994 Jan;74(1):61-70. doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.1.61.
PMID: 8265729BACKGROUNDStolze H, Klebe S, Baecker C, Zechlin C, Friege L, Pohle S, Deuschl G. Prevalence of gait disorders in hospitalized neurological patients. Mov Disord. 2005 Jan;20(1):89-94. doi: 10.1002/mds.20266.
PMID: 15390043BACKGROUNDWielinski CL, Erickson-Davis C, Wichmann R, Walde-Douglas M, Parashos SA. Falls and injuries resulting from falls among patients with Parkinson's disease and other parkinsonian syndromes. Mov Disord. 2005 Apr;20(4):410-415. doi: 10.1002/mds.20347.
PMID: 15580552BACKGROUNDNewton RU, Murphy AJ, Humphries BJ, Wilson GJ, Kraemer WJ, Hakkinen K. Influence of load and stretch shortening cycle on the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation that occurs during explosive upper-body movements. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(4):333-42. doi: 10.1007/s004210050169.
PMID: 9134365BACKGROUNDErnst M, Folkerts AK, Gollan R, Lieker E, Caro-Valenzuela J, Adams A, Cryns N, Monsef I, Dresen A, Roheger M, Eggers C, Skoetz N, Kalbe E. Physical exercise for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 8;4(4):CD013856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013856.pub3.
PMID: 38588457DERIVEDErnst M, Folkerts AK, Gollan R, Lieker E, Caro-Valenzuela J, Adams A, Cryns N, Monsef I, Dresen A, Roheger M, Eggers C, Skoetz N, Kalbe E. Physical exercise for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 5;1(1):CD013856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013856.pub2.
PMID: 36602886DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Brittany Intzandt, BSc
Wilfrid Laurier University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Graduate Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2015
First Posted
June 19, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03