Downsizing: Snacking in Preschool Children
Manipulation of Snack Intake in Young Children Using Snack Replacement and Snack Reduction
1 other identifier
interventional
46
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to investigate and compare two strategies of portion control in toddlers aged 24 to 59 months (snack replacement and snack reduction). The investigators aim to compare the effect of these strategies on habitual dietary intake (total energy intake (kcal), sugar intake (g), intake of fruits and vegetables, and intake at a test meal provided in the home (total energy intake (kcal) and intake of each component of the meal, e.g. intake of vegetables). Outcome measures will be compared to baseline within strategies and also between strategies to explore which portion control strategy might be most effective.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 12, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 13, 2017
CompletedNovember 13, 2017
November 1, 2017
8 months
August 23, 2017
November 9, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Retention
The number of people that adhered to the protocol
9 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Participation
9 months
Acceptability
9 months
Preliminary effects of the intervention
9 months
Preliminary effects of the intervention
9 months
Preliminary effects of the intervention
9 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Reduction
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be instructed to reduce all high energy dense snacks that they serve to thier children by 50%
Replacement
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be instructed to replace all high energy dense snacks with fresh fruit and vegetables
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parents/ caregivers of children aged 24-59 months old
- Must consume a HED snack at least once per day.
- Written informed consent provided from caregivers/ parents.
You may not qualify if:
- Children who attend nursery for more than three full consecutive days will be excluded due to the requirement of a four-day consecutive food diary to be completed in the home environment.
- Children with food allergies, long-term health conditions known to affect food intake, who are taking medication known to affect appetite, and those who report dislike of the snacks provided will be excluded from taking part.
- Children whose parents report a dislike of the study foods will also be excluded from taking part in the study.
- Children whose parents report no commercially available snack intake will be excluded from taking part in the study since participants will be required to reduce their children's snack intake by 50% or replace it with a LED alternative. At least one high energy dense, commercially available snack (e.g. chocolate, crisps) must normally be consumed per day by the child
- Parent child pairs must be able to commit to three consecutive weeks in order to take part in the study.
- Participant who are excluded from taking part in the current study will be invited to take part in our future studies where no study food will be provided.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sophie Realelead
- University of Leedscollaborator
- University of St Andrewscollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Samantha J Caton, PhD
University of Sheffield
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2017
First Posted
November 13, 2017
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 12, 2017
Study Completion
August 12, 2017
Last Updated
November 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share