NCT03290118

Brief Summary

This is an online study that aims to test the effectiveness of Interpretative Nutrition Rating Systems (INRS) such as the Health Star Rating System (HSR or Star System), traffic light system and warning labels (high sodium, saturated fat and sugar) proposed by Health Canada. The study will incorporate the use of a Smartphone application (app), FoodFlip®, to help educate consumers on each INRS prior to their exposure on food packages.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,008

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 8, 2017

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 20, 2017

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 21, 2017

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 9, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 9, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 4, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

19 days

First QC Date

September 8, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 3, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Comprehension task - ability to identify healthy products (survey measure)

    The participant's ability to identify the most healthy product in a group of 5 products in a task rating 5 products with varying levels of 'healthiness' according to modified FSANZ criteria. Question wording: Please rank these products in terms of healthiness where 1 is the"most healthy" and 5 is the "least healthy" cereal

    1 day (assessed immediately after app task and while viewing products with labelling system applied

  • Comprehension task - ability to identify unhealthy products (survey measure)

    The participant's ability to identify the least healthy product in a group of products in a group of 5 products in a task rating 5 products with varying levels of 'healthiness' according to modified FSANZ criteria. Question wording: Please rank these products in terms of healthiness where 1 is the"most healthy" and 5 is the "least healthy" cereal

    1 day (assessed immediately after app task and while viewing products with labelling system applied

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Comprehension task - ability to identify the overall 'healthiness' of a product (survey measure - Likert scale)

    1 day (assessed immediately after app task and while viewing products with labelling system applied

  • Hypothetical purchasing of products (survey measure - Likert scale)

    1 day (assessed immediately after app task and while viewing products with labelling system applied

Study Arms (4)

Traffic Light

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group will be provided with a survey that shows the food and beverage packages with traffic light front of pack labels only. Intervention is the Nutrition Rating System - Traffic Light

Other: Nutrition Rating System - Traffic LightDevice: Smartphone application FoodFlip Device®

Star System

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group will be provided with a survey that shows the food and beverage packages with health star rating front of pack labels only. Intervention is the Nutrition Rating System - Health Star Rating

Other: Nutrition Rating System - Health StarDevice: Smartphone application FoodFlip Device®

Warning Label

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group will be provided with a survey that shows the food and beverage packages with warning front of pack labels only. Intervention is the Nutrition Rating System - Warning Labels

Other: Nutrition Rating System - Warning LabelDevice: Smartphone application FoodFlip Device®

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Participants in this group will be provided with a survey that shows the food and beverage packages without any front of pack labels.

Interventions

Behavioural: Nutrition Rating Systems (shown on the online survey and the mobile app) provide consumers with an interpretation of the healthfulness of a food or beverage, by indicating the levels (low=green, moderate=amber, high=red) of sodium, saturated fat and sugar in a product based on modified Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) criteria.

Traffic Light

Behavioural: Nutrition Rating Systems (shown on the online survey and the mobile app) provide consumers with an interpretation of the healthfulness of a food or beverage product by indicating the number of stars awarded to a product, from 0.5 to 5 stars, based on modified Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) nutrient profiling criteria.

Star System

Behavioural: Nutrition Rating Systems (shown on the online survey and the mobile app) provide consumers with an interpretation of the healthfulness of a food or beverage product by indicating with a warning label products that are "high" in sodium, saturated fat and sugar, based on a percent daily value (%DV) greater than 15% for individual products and 30% for combination dishes.

Warning Label

This is embedded within each condition to inform and educate consumers about the labelling condition/intervention to which they are randomized. All participants are assigned to an app task to view 20 products and see the 'rating' these products would get according to their condition.

Star SystemTraffic LightWarning Label

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • speak English as a primary language
  • reside in Canada excluding the Northern Territories
  • are 18 years or over
  • provide informed consent
  • do at least some of the household grocery shopping
  • own a smartphone (version iPhone 3 or later or Android)
  • are able to complete the survey on a minimum screen size of 9.7 inches.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Toronto

Toronto, Ontario, M5S3E2, Canada

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Vanderlee L, Franco-Arellano B, Ahmed M, Oh A, Lou W, L'Abbe MR. The efficacy of 'high in' warning labels, health star and traffic light front-of-package labelling: an online randomised control trial. Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jan;24(1):62-74. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020003213. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

  • Ahmed M, Oh A, Vanderlee L, Franco-Arellano B, Schermel A, Lou W, L'Abbe MR. A randomized controlled trial examining consumers' perceptions and opinions on using different versions of a FoodFlip(c) smartphone application for delivery of nutrition information. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Feb 12;17(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-0923-1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chair of the Department of Nutritional Sciences

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2017

First Posted

September 21, 2017

Study Start

September 20, 2017

Primary Completion

October 9, 2017

Study Completion

October 9, 2017

Last Updated

October 4, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10

Locations