Adaptive Internet-based Stress Management Among Adults With a Cardiovascular Disease: A Pilot Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) Design
1 other identifier
interventional
59
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Internet-based stress management programs adapted to patients' needs Stress is inevitable, and it has many negative consequences on the health of everybody, but particularly on the health of patients with a cardiovascular disease (CVD). The good news is that patients with CVD can learn to better control their stress through stress management programs. Most stress management programs are offered face-to-face by a trained health care professional. Research has shown that these programs have a positive impact on the health of patients with CVD, including reducing mortality and other risk factors that can make the disease worse (e.g., reduces blood pressure). Because of these benefits, the recommendation is to offer a stress management program to as many patients with CVD as possible. The problem is that their delivery is challenging for most clinics (e.g., too costly to run, health care professionals are not available). This means many good stress management programs never make it to the patient. Patients also face barriers in accessing traditional stress management programs such as stigma or need to travel. Therefore, new approaches are needed to allow findings from research to actually have an impact on the public's health. One of these approaches is to use the internet to deliver stress management programs. The internet has now been used for about 10 years to deliver a range of programs to patients. There are limitations to this approach as well. For instance, 40-60% of patients who will use an internet-based program will not benefit from it. These patients need more support or guidance to get the most out of their internet-based program. This is the problem addressed using the proposed innovative trial design. Investigators aim to improve the number of patients with CVD who improve after receiving a stress management program by changing the type and level of support they receive over time. This type of innovative trial design is more and more popular, but has never been used to enhance a stress management programs for patients with CVD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable cardiovascular-diseases
Started Oct 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2019
CompletedNovember 4, 2019
November 1, 2019
1.3 years
August 28, 2017
November 1, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Feasibility
defined as the practicality of implementing the SMART procedures and of offering different types and levels of support in conjunction with an Internet-based stress management program. Feasibility measures include fidelity, reach, recruitment rate, and questionnaire completion rates.
Recruitment over 6 months, participant follow-up over 13 weeks
Acceptability
defined as patients' views of the programs, and will include satisfaction with the different types of support offered, appropriateness of adapting the programs for non-responders, examining attrition, and assessing adherence and skills learned.
Recruitment over 6 months, participant follow-up over 13 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Clinical significance
At T2: 12-13 weeks
Other Outcomes (2)
Stress
At T0 (Baseline), T1 (6 weeks) and T2 (12-13 weeks)
Quality of life
At T0 (Baseline), T1 (6 weeks) and T2 (12-13 weeks)
Study Arms (3)
First stage: Self-directed My Health CheckUp
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to this group will be sent an e-mail invitation by the research team to register to the website. Once registered, participants will receive a second e-mail that will provide brief instructions on getting started and invite them to use the website for 12 weeks ad libitum. No additional contact will be provided thereafter by research team.
First stage: Minimally guided My Health CheckUp.
EXPERIMENTALThis group will also be invited to use the 12-week Internet-based stress management program, but they will additionally receive support via weekly telephone calls from a lay coach.
Second stage: High intensity Motivational Interviewing (MI)
EXPERIMENTALAfter 6 weeks, response to the first stage programs will be assessed and only the non-responders will be randomized a second time to (a) continue with the first stage programs or (b) High-intensity MI. In addition to continued access to My Health CheckUp, participants in this group will also be supported with 6 weekly, telephone-based MI sessions.
Interventions
Self-contained, web-based, stress management program developed by team of health care professionals, designed to encourage patients to learn evidence-based cognitive and behavioural strategies to effectively manage stress. Health risk appraisals include evidence-based recommendations to address risks. Stress management modules include education about the impact of stress, self-monitoring through a stress diary, and using four key strategies: physical activity, deep breathing and relaxation, problem-solving/addressing negative thoughts, and sleep hygiene. Through the modules, patients will learn new stress management strategies and have an opportunity to practice these, track their progress, and obtain feedback via the website. To facilitate self-monitoring of stress levels and tracking of strategies such as physical activity, tracking tools can be used on mobile devices.
The goal of telephone coaching will be to provide brief encouragement on how to use the modules; however, no formal therapy will be provided. Sessions will range between 10-15 minutes. Each coach session will follow the process outlined by the GROW model, which stands for Goal, Reality, Options/Obstacles, and Will/Way forward. The sessions will start with the coach and participant agreeing on the topics for discussion and desired outcomes (goal). Then, coaches will explore the use of the intervention over the previous week, guide participants through the modules, identify barriers to using these modules, offer advice to overcome these barriers, and provide positive reinforcement. The development of an action plan for the following week will conclude each session. The short Perceived Stress Scale will be used at the end of each session to monitor progress. A script will guide the lay coach through each call.
Sessions will range from 30 to 45 minutes. The goal of MI is to strengthen patients' motivation and confidence for adopting the stress management strategies suggested. The MI practitioner's interventions are based on the four processes of MI: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- physician-confirmed diagnosis of a CVD (at least 3 months since most recent diagnosis)
- moderate stress as indicated by a score of \> 15 on the stress subscale of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS)
- regular access to a computer with Internet and e-mail capabilities
- understands English or French
You may not qualify if:
- participated in a stress management program in the past year
- hospitalized or living in a long-term care residence
- moderate-severe cognitive impairment (Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration test score 10+)
- severe stress (DASS stress score \> 34)
- suicidal intent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St. Mary's Research Center, Canadalead
- McGill Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
St Mary's Hospital Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H3T1M5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sylvie D Lambert, PhD
McGill University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2017
First Posted
August 31, 2017
Study Start
October 30, 2017
Primary Completion
February 28, 2019
Study Completion
August 31, 2019
Last Updated
November 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share