NCT03263585

Brief Summary

Background: Back pain and osteoporosis with vertebral fractures are common conditions in elderly women and significantly affect their quality of life. A common complication of osteoporosis are vertebral fractures. Treatment with bone-specific drugs does often not help the pain condition caused by the vertebral fractures even when the progress of the disease has decreased. Vertebral fractures often result in deformation of the spine and poorer quality of life of the individual. The spinal kyphosis also affects the lung function and the effect of the kyphosis itself is severe. Alternative treatments of back pain may lead to reduced drug demand for pain. Physical activity is one of the most important factors that regulates bone mass and can also affect balance and fall risk positively. The back orthosis that we intend to use in the treatment study has been shown in some previous scientific studies to strengthen the muscles in the back and also decrease the pain. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of treatment of back pain in elderly women with an activating functional orthosis versus treatment with a group of physiotherapeutic tools and a control group for a six-month treatment period and follow-up after 12 months from the start of study. The aim was also to study elderly women with osteoporosis and back pain in a follow-up study of a cohort of women at high risk of osteoporotic fractures, with focus on back pain, functional capacity and quality of life. The aim was to study the effect of treatment with activating functional orthosis versus physiotherapeutic treatment in a group and a control group without treatment. The main outcomes will be the experienced perceived back pain and back extensor strength. Additional outcomes will be quality of life, balance, lung function and kyphosis. Biochemical markers for pain will be measured in the RCT (Randomized Controlled Trial). Significance: Evaluation of alternative treatment methods such as exercise by a physiotherapist and treatment with a functional orthosis will give new additional treatment options for our patients. An activating functional orthosis could reduce the use of analgesics and increase the quality of life of the affected women.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
113

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2012

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 3, 2012

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 22, 2012

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 22, 2014

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 26, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 28, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

August 31, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

June 26, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 30, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

OsteoporosisVertebral FractureBack PainSpinal orthosisElderly women

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Back pain

    Measured with Visual Analogue Scale

    Baseline and six months

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • Back muscle extensor strength

    Baseline and six months

  • Borg CR-10

    Baseline and six months

  • Kyphosis

    Baseline and six months

  • Substance P

    Baseline and six months

  • CGRP Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide

    Baseline and six months

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Spinal orthosis group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Women wearing the spinal orthosis Spinomed for 6 months at least 2 hours a day.

Device: Spinal orthosis Spinomed

Equipment training group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Women training once a week in an equipment training group led by a physiotherapist for six months.

Other: Equipment training

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Women in the control group get no intervention for six months.

Interventions

Spinal orthosis group
Equipment training group

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Woman aged ≥ 60 years
  • Osteoporosis according to DXA (Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry) hip (femoral neck or total hip) or lumbar spine.
  • Back pain.

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosed symptomatic spinal stenosis
  • Difficulty to participate in the activities included in the study due to health problems.
  • Difficulty to participate in equipment training group.
  • Inability to be able to complete wearing the spinal orthosis.
  • Language difficulties
  • Cognitive difficulties
  • Visual problems

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Rehab City

Stockholm, 11361, Sweden

Location

Liljeholmen Academic Health Centre

Stockholm, 11763, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1994;843:1-129. No abstract available.

    PMID: 7941614BACKGROUND
  • Cauley JA, Hochberg MC, Lui LY, Palermo L, Ensrud KE, Hillier TA, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR. Long-term risk of incident vertebral fractures. JAMA. 2007 Dec 19;298(23):2761-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.23.2761.

    PMID: 18165669BACKGROUND
  • Delmas PD, van de Langerijt L, Watts NB, Eastell R, Genant H, Grauer A, Cahall DL; IMPACT Study Group. Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Apr;20(4):557-63. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.041214. Epub 2004 Dec 6.

    PMID: 15765173BACKGROUND
  • Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, De Laet C, Jonsson B. The risk and burden of vertebral fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int. 2004 Jan;15(1):20-6. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1463-7. Epub 2003 Oct 31.

    PMID: 14593450BACKGROUND
  • Kasukawa Y, Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, Ishikawa Y, Noguchi H, Kamo K, Sasaki H, Murata K, Shimada Y. Relationships between falls, spinal curvature, spinal mobility and back extensor strength in elderly people. J Bone Miner Metab. 2010;28(1):82-7. doi: 10.1007/s00774-009-0107-1. Epub 2009 Aug 19.

    PMID: 19690799BACKGROUND
  • Hallberg I, Bachrach-Lindstrom M, Hammerby S, Toss G, Ek AC. Health-related quality of life after vertebral or hip fracture: a seven-year follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Nov 3;10:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-135.

    PMID: 19886998BACKGROUND
  • Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Ioannidis G, Brown JP, Pathak A, Hanley DA, Josse RG, Sebaldt RJ, Olszynski WP, Tenenhouse A, Murray TM, Petrie A, Goldsmith CH, Adachi JD. Determinants of health-related quality of life in women with vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(3):355-63. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-2020-3. Epub 2005 Dec 9.

    PMID: 16341623BACKGROUND
  • Strom O, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Ceder L, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Jonsson B. Long-term cost and effect on quality of life of osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Acta Orthop. 2008 Apr;79(2):269-80. doi: 10.1080/17453670710015094.

    PMID: 18484255BACKGROUND
  • Francis RM, Aspray TJ, Hide G, Sutcliffe AM, Wilkinson P. Back pain in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2008 Jul;19(7):895-903. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0530-x. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

    PMID: 18071648BACKGROUND
  • Pfeifer M, Begerow B, Minne HW. Effects of a new spinal orthosis on posture, trunk strength, and quality of life in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Mar;83(3):177-86. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000113403.16617.93.

    PMID: 15043351BACKGROUND
  • Pfeifer M, Kohlwey L, Begerow B, Minne HW. Effects of two newly developed spinal orthoses on trunk muscle strength, posture, and quality-of-life in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Oct;90(10):805-15. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31821f6df3.

    PMID: 21681065BACKGROUND
  • Salminen H, Saaf M, Ringertz H, Strender LE. Bone mineral density measurement in the calcaneus with DXL: comparison with hip and spine measurements in a cross-sectional study of an elderly female population. Osteoporos Int. 2005 May;16(5):541-51. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1719-x. Epub 2004 Sep 21.

    PMID: 15448984BACKGROUND
  • Salminen H, Saaf M, Johansson SE, Ringertz H, Strender LE. Nutritional status, as determined by the Mini-Nutritional Assessment, and osteoporosis: a cross-sectional study of an elderly female population. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;60(4):486-93. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602341.

    PMID: 16391579BACKGROUND
  • Salminen H, Saaf M, Ringertz H, Strender LE. The role of IGF-I and IGFBP-1 status and secondary hyperparathyroidism in relation to osteoporosis in elderly Swedish women. Osteoporos Int. 2008 Feb;19(2):201-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0463-4. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

    PMID: 17874030BACKGROUND
  • Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.

    PMID: 1593914BACKGROUND
  • Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, Caulin F, Egger P, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kellingray S, Leplege A, Liberman UA, McCloskey E, Minne H, Reeve J, Reginster JY, Scholz M, Todd C, de Vernejoul MC, Wiklund I. Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(2):150-60. doi: 10.1007/s001980050210.

    PMID: 10501796BACKGROUND
  • Lips P, van Schoor NM. Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2005 May;16(5):447-55. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1762-7. Epub 2004 Dec 18.

    PMID: 15609073BACKGROUND
  • Lips P, Agnusdei D, Caulin F, Cooper C, Johnell O, Kanis J, Liberman U, Minne H, Reeve J, Reginster JY, de Vernejoul MC, Wiklund I. The development of a European questionnaire for quality of life in patients with vertebral osteoporosis. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1996;103:84-5; discussion 86-8. doi: 10.3109/03009749609103757.

    PMID: 8966496BACKGROUND
  • Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6.

    PMID: 10158943BACKGROUND
  • Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey--I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1349-58. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00125-q.

    PMID: 8560302BACKGROUND
  • Kaijser Alin C, Uzunel E, Grahn Kronhed AC, Alinaghizadeh H, Salminen H. Effect of treatment on back pain and back extensor strength with a spinal orthosis in older women with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0555-0.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

OsteoporosisSpinal FracturesBack Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone Diseases, MetabolicBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesSpinal InjuriesBack InjuriesWounds and InjuriesFractures, BonePainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Eeva Helena S Salminen, MD, PhD

    Karolinska Institutet

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: Randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PI

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2017

First Posted

August 28, 2017

Study Start

May 3, 2012

Primary Completion

November 22, 2012

Study Completion

December 22, 2014

Last Updated

August 31, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data is available only for the research group and available for other researchers only after new ethical review and in collaboration

Locations