Treatment With a Spinal Orthosis Compared to Equipment Group Training and a Control Group
Identification and Treatment of Back Pain in Elderly Women With Osteoporosis
1 other identifier
interventional
113
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background: Back pain and osteoporosis with vertebral fractures are common conditions in elderly women and significantly affect their quality of life. A common complication of osteoporosis are vertebral fractures. Treatment with bone-specific drugs does often not help the pain condition caused by the vertebral fractures even when the progress of the disease has decreased. Vertebral fractures often result in deformation of the spine and poorer quality of life of the individual. The spinal kyphosis also affects the lung function and the effect of the kyphosis itself is severe. Alternative treatments of back pain may lead to reduced drug demand for pain. Physical activity is one of the most important factors that regulates bone mass and can also affect balance and fall risk positively. The back orthosis that we intend to use in the treatment study has been shown in some previous scientific studies to strengthen the muscles in the back and also decrease the pain. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of treatment of back pain in elderly women with an activating functional orthosis versus treatment with a group of physiotherapeutic tools and a control group for a six-month treatment period and follow-up after 12 months from the start of study. The aim was also to study elderly women with osteoporosis and back pain in a follow-up study of a cohort of women at high risk of osteoporotic fractures, with focus on back pain, functional capacity and quality of life. The aim was to study the effect of treatment with activating functional orthosis versus physiotherapeutic treatment in a group and a control group without treatment. The main outcomes will be the experienced perceived back pain and back extensor strength. Additional outcomes will be quality of life, balance, lung function and kyphosis. Biochemical markers for pain will be measured in the RCT (Randomized Controlled Trial). Significance: Evaluation of alternative treatment methods such as exercise by a physiotherapist and treatment with a functional orthosis will give new additional treatment options for our patients. An activating functional orthosis could reduce the use of analgesics and increase the quality of life of the affected women.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 3, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 22, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 22, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2017
CompletedAugust 31, 2017
August 1, 2017
7 months
June 26, 2017
August 30, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Back pain
Measured with Visual Analogue Scale
Baseline and six months
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Back muscle extensor strength
Baseline and six months
Borg CR-10
Baseline and six months
Kyphosis
Baseline and six months
Substance P
Baseline and six months
CGRP Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide
Baseline and six months
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Spinal orthosis group
ACTIVE COMPARATORWomen wearing the spinal orthosis Spinomed for 6 months at least 2 hours a day.
Equipment training group
ACTIVE COMPARATORWomen training once a week in an equipment training group led by a physiotherapist for six months.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONWomen in the control group get no intervention for six months.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Woman aged ≥ 60 years
- Osteoporosis according to DXA (Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry) hip (femoral neck or total hip) or lumbar spine.
- Back pain.
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed symptomatic spinal stenosis
- Difficulty to participate in the activities included in the study due to health problems.
- Difficulty to participate in equipment training group.
- Inability to be able to complete wearing the spinal orthosis.
- Language difficulties
- Cognitive difficulties
- Visual problems
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Helena Salminenlead
- Medi GmbH & Co.KGcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Rehab City
Stockholm, 11361, Sweden
Liljeholmen Academic Health Centre
Stockholm, 11763, Sweden
Related Publications (21)
Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1994;843:1-129. No abstract available.
PMID: 7941614BACKGROUNDCauley JA, Hochberg MC, Lui LY, Palermo L, Ensrud KE, Hillier TA, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR. Long-term risk of incident vertebral fractures. JAMA. 2007 Dec 19;298(23):2761-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.23.2761.
PMID: 18165669BACKGROUNDDelmas PD, van de Langerijt L, Watts NB, Eastell R, Genant H, Grauer A, Cahall DL; IMPACT Study Group. Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Apr;20(4):557-63. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.041214. Epub 2004 Dec 6.
PMID: 15765173BACKGROUNDKanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, De Laet C, Jonsson B. The risk and burden of vertebral fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int. 2004 Jan;15(1):20-6. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1463-7. Epub 2003 Oct 31.
PMID: 14593450BACKGROUNDKasukawa Y, Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, Ishikawa Y, Noguchi H, Kamo K, Sasaki H, Murata K, Shimada Y. Relationships between falls, spinal curvature, spinal mobility and back extensor strength in elderly people. J Bone Miner Metab. 2010;28(1):82-7. doi: 10.1007/s00774-009-0107-1. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
PMID: 19690799BACKGROUNDHallberg I, Bachrach-Lindstrom M, Hammerby S, Toss G, Ek AC. Health-related quality of life after vertebral or hip fracture: a seven-year follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Nov 3;10:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-135.
PMID: 19886998BACKGROUNDPapaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Ioannidis G, Brown JP, Pathak A, Hanley DA, Josse RG, Sebaldt RJ, Olszynski WP, Tenenhouse A, Murray TM, Petrie A, Goldsmith CH, Adachi JD. Determinants of health-related quality of life in women with vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(3):355-63. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-2020-3. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
PMID: 16341623BACKGROUNDStrom O, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Ceder L, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Jonsson B. Long-term cost and effect on quality of life of osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Acta Orthop. 2008 Apr;79(2):269-80. doi: 10.1080/17453670710015094.
PMID: 18484255BACKGROUNDFrancis RM, Aspray TJ, Hide G, Sutcliffe AM, Wilkinson P. Back pain in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2008 Jul;19(7):895-903. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0530-x. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
PMID: 18071648BACKGROUNDPfeifer M, Begerow B, Minne HW. Effects of a new spinal orthosis on posture, trunk strength, and quality of life in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Mar;83(3):177-86. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000113403.16617.93.
PMID: 15043351BACKGROUNDPfeifer M, Kohlwey L, Begerow B, Minne HW. Effects of two newly developed spinal orthoses on trunk muscle strength, posture, and quality-of-life in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Oct;90(10):805-15. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31821f6df3.
PMID: 21681065BACKGROUNDSalminen H, Saaf M, Ringertz H, Strender LE. Bone mineral density measurement in the calcaneus with DXL: comparison with hip and spine measurements in a cross-sectional study of an elderly female population. Osteoporos Int. 2005 May;16(5):541-51. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1719-x. Epub 2004 Sep 21.
PMID: 15448984BACKGROUNDSalminen H, Saaf M, Johansson SE, Ringertz H, Strender LE. Nutritional status, as determined by the Mini-Nutritional Assessment, and osteoporosis: a cross-sectional study of an elderly female population. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;60(4):486-93. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602341.
PMID: 16391579BACKGROUNDSalminen H, Saaf M, Ringertz H, Strender LE. The role of IGF-I and IGFBP-1 status and secondary hyperparathyroidism in relation to osteoporosis in elderly Swedish women. Osteoporos Int. 2008 Feb;19(2):201-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0463-4. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
PMID: 17874030BACKGROUNDWare JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
PMID: 1593914BACKGROUNDLips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, Caulin F, Egger P, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kellingray S, Leplege A, Liberman UA, McCloskey E, Minne H, Reeve J, Reginster JY, Scholz M, Todd C, de Vernejoul MC, Wiklund I. Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(2):150-60. doi: 10.1007/s001980050210.
PMID: 10501796BACKGROUNDLips P, van Schoor NM. Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2005 May;16(5):447-55. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1762-7. Epub 2004 Dec 18.
PMID: 15609073BACKGROUNDLips P, Agnusdei D, Caulin F, Cooper C, Johnell O, Kanis J, Liberman U, Minne H, Reeve J, Reginster JY, de Vernejoul MC, Wiklund I. The development of a European questionnaire for quality of life in patients with vertebral osteoporosis. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1996;103:84-5; discussion 86-8. doi: 10.3109/03009749609103757.
PMID: 8966496BACKGROUNDBrooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6.
PMID: 10158943BACKGROUNDSullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey--I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1349-58. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00125-q.
PMID: 8560302BACKGROUNDKaijser Alin C, Uzunel E, Grahn Kronhed AC, Alinaghizadeh H, Salminen H. Effect of treatment on back pain and back extensor strength with a spinal orthosis in older women with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0555-0.
PMID: 30623268DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eeva Helena S Salminen, MD, PhD
Karolinska Institutet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PI
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2017
First Posted
August 28, 2017
Study Start
May 3, 2012
Primary Completion
November 22, 2012
Study Completion
December 22, 2014
Last Updated
August 31, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data is available only for the research group and available for other researchers only after new ethical review and in collaboration