NCT05227976

Brief Summary

In the present feasibility and pilot study we aim to investigate the effect and safety of patient education with or without additional physical training or mindfulness/medical yoga in patients with manifest spinal osteoporosis (at least one vertebral fracture). The study includes a 10-week intervention period with once weekly theory education with or without additional physical training or mindfulness/medical yoga (randomized groups). Furthermore, a proceeding observation period of 10 weeks as well as a 1-year follow up post-intervention observation are included in the study design.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
31

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 15, 2018

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 30, 2020

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 12, 2022

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 8, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 10, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

January 12, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 9, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

patient educationyogamindfulnessphysical training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (14)

  • Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) - disease specific

    Assessed with Qualeffo-41 (quality of life questionnaire of the European foundation for osteoporosis). The Qualeffo-41 includes 41 questions in seven domains. Domain scores are calculated by averaging the scores of one domain, and transforming them into a 0-100 scale according to a manual on scoring algorithm. Zero indicates the best possible and 100 the worst HRQoL. The Total Qualeffo-41 score is calculated by summing the answers of all questions and transforming the raw total scores from 0-100 (IOF homepage 2007 http://www.iofbonehealth.org)

    1.5 year

  • Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) - generic

    Assessed with RAND-36 (Research and Development questionnaire). The RAND-36 compromises 36 items with two to six response options according to an ordinal scale. Eight health domains are assessed, coded, scored and summarised to derive the domains. The scores are transformed into a 0-100 scale. Zero indicates the worst possible HRQoL and 100 the best.

    1.5 year

  • Body weight

    Body weight (kg) is measured by a digital scale, and with the participant in an upright position without shoes.

    6 months

  • Body height

    Body height (cm) is measured by a stadiometer with the participant in an upright position without shoes.

    6 months

  • Static balance test

    The static balance tests are performed without shoes both with the eyes open and with the eyes closed. (The floor is leveled, and the room is well illuminated). The static balance tests are limited to a maximum of 30 seconds and timed by using a stop-watch. The one-leg stance tests are performed with the opposite foot lifted halfway upon the calf of the supported leg and the arms at a vertical position at the sides of the body. If the participant has contact with the floor with the non-standing foot the time is stopped. The one-leg standing time (on each leg) tests are performed three times and the best of the trials is used as the final score

    6 months

  • Dynamic balance test

    Dynamic balance tests are walking without shoes forwards heel to toe on a line and walking backwards toe to heel on a line. These tests are performed three times and the number of correct steps is counted and maximized to 15 correct steps, where the best of the trials is used as the final score.

    6 months

  • Muscle strength Chair-stand

    The chair-stand test is performed from sitting on a stable chair with the arms crossed in front of the chest. The total number of risings is counted for 30 seconds using a stop-watch.

    6 months

  • Muscle strength Hand grip

    Hand grip strength is measured in kilograms by using the Jamar dynamometer both of the dominant and the non-dominant hand. The subject is sitting on a stable chair with 90° of the elbow and support for the forearm in a neutral position, but with no support for the hand which is gripping the dynamometer. The adjustable handle was set at the second handle position for standardization. Each test was performed three times and the best trial was used as the final score.

    6 months

  • C7 to wall distance

    The participant stans upright, as tall as possible, with both heels and the back against the wall and the head in a neutral position. A folding ruler is used to measure the perpendicular distance in centimeter between the seventh cervical vertebra (C7) and the wall.

    6 months

  • Pain assessment

    Numeric rating scale (NRS) is used to measure present pain intensity, pain for the last week and worst pain. The participant is asked to report an integer between 0-10 to assess the perceived pain, where "no pain" is rated as 0 and "worst possible pain" is rated as 10.

    1.5 year

  • Number of patients using pain medications regularly

    Participants are asked for their usage of pain medications (i.e. names of the drugs).

    1.5 year

  • Physical activity

    Two physical activity questions are used and answered by categories on a six-point (question 1) and seven-point Likert scale (question 2), respectively: 1. First question: During a regular week, how much time do you spend exercising on a level that makes you short winded, for example running, fitness class or ball games? Possible answers: 0 minutes, \<30 minutes, 30-60 minutes, 60-90 minutes, 90-120 minutes, \>120 minutes ( 2. Second question: During a regular week, how much time are you physically active in ways that are not exercise, for example walks, bicycling or gardening? Add together all activities lasting at least 10 minutes. Possible answers: 0 minutes, \<30 minutes, 30-60 minutes, 60-90 minutes, 90-150 minutes, 150-300 minutes, \>300 minutes

    1.5 year

  • Patient enablement instrument (PEI)

    The patient enablement instrument (PEI) is used to measure the patient's perceived change in ability to understand and cope with his or her health issues after the treatment period and contains six items. The text "As a result of the participating in the Osteoporosis School, do you feel that you are …" is followed by six items; 1) able to cope with life, 2) able to understand your illness, 3) able to cope with your illness, 4) able to keep yourself healthy, 5) confident about your health, and 6) able to help yourself. The following five alternative answers were used for each statement; much better/much more, better/more, same, less/worse and not applicable. The PEI point for much better/much more is 2; for better/more is 1; and for same, less/worse or not applicable is 0. These points are added and thus the total PEI score ranges between 0 (worst score) and 12 (best score).

    1.5 year

  • Subjective experience of the patient education

    The participants' overall experiences of the theoretical lectures (and the physical training) are scored on a six-level Likert scale (scores 0-6), where 5 is considered very satisfied and 0 is not at all satisfied.

    1.5 year

Study Arms (3)

Theory only

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Once weekly for 10 weeks

Behavioral: Patient education (Theory)

Theory and physical training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Once weekly for 10 weeks

Behavioral: Patient education (Theory)Behavioral: Physical training

Theory and mindfulness/medical yoga

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Once weekly for 10 weeks

Behavioral: Patient education (Theory)Behavioral: Mindfulness and medical yoga in group

Interventions

Theory/Lectures (1h/week) Interventions given once weekly for 10 weeks.

Theory and mindfulness/medical yogaTheory and physical trainingTheory only

Physical training group (1 hour/week) Interventions given once weekly for 10 weeks.

Theory and physical training

Mindfulness/medical yoga in group (1hour/week) Interventions given once weekly for 10 weeks.

Theory and mindfulness/medical yoga

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • diagnosed with established spinal osteoporosis (at least one vertebral fracture and osteoporosis)
  • \>3 months had passed since the most recent VF
  • age ≥60 years
  • physical ability to walk without an indoor walker

You may not qualify if:

  • inability to understand the Swedish language or difficulty following the research protocol or dementia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Linköping

Linköping, 58185, Sweden

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

OsteoporosisSpinal Fractures

Interventions

Patient Education as TopicPhysical Conditioning, HumanMindfulnessPopulation Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone Diseases, MetabolicBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesSpinal InjuriesBack InjuriesWounds and InjuriesFractures, Bone

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Health EducationPreventive Health ServicesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesExerciseMotor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological PhenomenaCognitive Behavioral TherapyBehavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesDemographyPopulation Characteristics

Study Officials

  • Anna Spångeus, Ass.Prof, MD

    Univerity Hospital Linköping, Linköping University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor, MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2022

First Posted

February 8, 2022

Study Start

March 15, 2018

Primary Completion

January 30, 2020

Study Completion

January 30, 2020

Last Updated

May 10, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations