VERTOS-II. Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Therapy
VERTOS II. Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Therapy in Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
200
2 countries
6
Brief Summary
Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a new procedure for treating painful osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine. Five-thousand out of 12.000 patients (16.000 vertebral fractures/year in the Netherlands) present with sudden, severe back pain in the region of the fracture.Until recently, bed rest, analgesia and physical support were the only treatment options. After decades of performing PV, no large RCT with mid-term follow-up has been published. Design: This will be a multicenter (6 centers), prospective, randomised, intervention study. Eligible patients will be randomised for percutaneous vertebroplasty or conservative therapy. Study population: Age: 50 and older, vertebral fracture, level: thoracic vertebral body 5 (Th 5) or lower, osteopenia (T-score \< -1 SD), back pain for no more than 6 weeks and edema in the vertebrae on MR imaging Statistical analyses All analyses will be performed on an 'intention to treat' principle. The planned number of subjects will be 200 in total, 100 in each intervention arm. Economic evaluation: Cost-effectiveness will be assessed. The costs of the procedure and the medical treatment, and of visits to medical specialists, GP's and physical therapists will be compared. Time schedule: The total study will take 36 months Recruitment of patients (200) has been completed. In May 2009 the 1 year follow-up will be finished.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2006
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2005
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2010
CompletedFebruary 15, 2018
June 1, 2008
September 30, 2005
February 14, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To compare the cost-effectivity in the two groups
1 month, 1 year
VAS score in time
1 month, 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To compare pain relief and the quality of life of the patients in the two groups.
1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Study Arms (2)
2
NO INTERVENTIONconservative therapy (no intervention)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORVertebroplasty
Interventions
Procedure: The treatment consists of a transpedicular injection of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement into the collapsed vertebral body (maximal 2 vertebrae in 1 treatment session) using fluoroscopic guidance. The procedure is performed under the use of local anesthetics and the patient can be discharged the same day or after 1 night of hospital stay.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age: 50 and older
- vertebral fracture: 15-85% height loss
- level: thoracic vertebral body 5 (Th 5) or lower
- osteopenia (T-score \< -1 SD)
- back pain for at least no longer than 6 weeks
- edema in the vertebrae on MR imaging
You may not qualify if:
- complete loss of vertebral body height
- fracture through or destruction of the posterior vertebral wall
- pressure of bone fragments on the spinal cord
- osteomyelitis or spondylodiscitis
- vertebral column neoplasms
- uncorrectable coagulation disorder
- medical conditions that would make the patient ineligible for emergency decompressive surgery should it be necessary to treat a complication of the procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
AZ St. Lucas Ziekenhuis
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Diakonessenhuis
Utrecht/Zeist/Doorn, Utrecht, 3508 TG, Netherlands
Albert Schweizer Ziekenhuis
Dordrecht, 3300 AK, Netherlands
Catharina-Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, Netherlands
St. Elisabeth Ziekenhuis
Tilburg, 5022 GC, Netherlands
UMCU
Utrecht, 3508 GA, Netherlands
Related Publications (4)
Klazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Blonk MC, Venmans A, van Rooij WJ, Schoemaker MC, Juttmann JR, Lo TH, Verhaar HJ, van der Graaf Y, van Everdingen KJ, Muller AF, Elgersma OE, Halkema DR, Fransen H, Janssens X, Buskens E, Mali WP. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1085-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60954-3. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
PMID: 20701962DERIVEDKlazen CA, Venmans A, de Vries J, van Rooij WJ, Jansen FH, Blonk MC, Lohle PN, Juttmann JR, Buskens E, van Everdingen KJ, Muller A, Fransen H, Elgersma OE, Mali WP, Verhaar HJ. Percutaneous vertebroplasty is not a risk factor for new osteoporotic compression fractures: results from VERTOS II. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Sep;31(8):1447-50. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2148. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
PMID: 20651016DERIVEDVenmans A, Klazen CA, Lohle PN, van Rooij WJ, Verhaar HJ, de Vries J, Mali WP. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and pulmonary cement embolism: results from VERTOS II. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Sep;31(8):1451-3. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2127. Epub 2010 May 20.
PMID: 20488908DERIVEDKlazen CA, Verhaar HJ, Lampmann LE, Juttmann JR, Blonk MC, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Schoemaker MC, Buskens E, van der Graaf Y, Janssens X, Fransen H, van Everdingen KJ, Muller AF, Mali WP, Lohle PN. VERTOS II: percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2007 Oct 31;8:33. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-33.
PMID: 17973983DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Willem Mali, MD.PhD
UMC Utrecht
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical research coordinator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2005
First Posted
October 4, 2005
Study Start
February 1, 2006
Study Completion
June 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 15, 2018
Record last verified: 2008-06