Effectiveness of Inelastic LSO Versus Standard Medical Treatment for Back Pain Associated With Kyphosis
ARISE
A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study To Determine Clinical Effectiveness and Patient Wellness of Inelastic Lumbosacral Orthoses Versus Standard Medical Treatment in Patients With Back Pain AssociatEd With Kyphosis (The ARISE Study)
1 other identifier
interventional
16
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate clinical effectiveness and the effect on quality of life of an inelastic thoracolumbarasacral orthosis in male and female hyperkyphotic patients with moderate to severe back pain disability and to demonstrate the safety of the intervention through detailed reporting and analysis of adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2012
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 23, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 3, 2014
CompletedJuly 3, 2014
July 1, 2014
1.7 years
January 23, 2014
July 1, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean difference in the Oswestry Disability Index Scores of the intervention versus control groups
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Measured amount of opioid medication consumed in the intervention group versus control group
Baseline and weeks 2,3,4,8,12,16,20 and 24
Other Outcomes (4)
ODI scores between the intervention group versus control group
Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
SF-26v2 Survey scores in the intervention versus the control group
Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24.
Cost and return on investment of the LSO intervention
24 weeks
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group A
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients assigned to group A wore the Summit 456 TLSO (intervention) for four weeks in phase 1 of the study, followed by four weeks of observation (control) in phase 2.
Group B
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients assigned to group B started four weeks of observation (control) in phase 1, followed by four weeks of summit 456 TLSO (intervention) in phase 2 of the study.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with moderate to complete disability (crippled) as defined by a score of 21% to 80% on the baseline evaluation of the Oswestry Back Pain Disability Questionnaire;
- Patients diagnosed with kyphosis and have a Cobb angle of at least 55 degrees;
- Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under the age of 19;
- Pregnant patients or patients who are considering future pregnancies;
- Patients who were participating in any other investigational device or drug study or whose participation in a previous investigational study within 30 days of study entry may, in the opinion of the clinical investigator, impact analysis of this orthotic;
- Patients who, in the clinical judgment of the investigator, are not suitable for this study; Patients who, in the investigators opinion, are mentally or legally incapacitated preventing informed consent or unable to read or understand written material;
- Patients who are unable or unwilling to return to the study center for follow-up visits.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel J Schaffer, MD
Southeastern Integrated Medical
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2014
First Posted
July 3, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
July 3, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-07