Analgesic Efficiency of Pudendal Nerve Block Versus Penil Block for Circumsion in Children
Comparison of Analgesic Efficiency of Pudendal Nerve Block and Penil Block for Circumsion in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
80
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this prospective randomized study is to assess the analgesic efficacy of Pudendal block compared with penil block for pediatric patients undergoing circumsion concerning postoperative analgesic consumption within 24 hours.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2017
CompletedNovember 17, 2017
November 1, 2017
7 months
August 20, 2017
November 15, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative pain evaluatiom
CHEOPS pain scale
24 hour
Study Arms (2)
Pudendal block group in circumcision
ACTIVE COMPARATORNerve stimulated pudendal nerve block performed under general anesthesia
Penil block group in circumcision
ACTIVE COMPARATORPenil block performed by surgeon under general anesthesia
Interventions
regional analgesia methods during the circumsion nerve stimulator guided pudendal block performed by anesthesiologist/ penil block performed by surgeon before circumcision
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I-II patients, aged 1-12 years old patient undergoing circumcision,
You may not qualify if:
- history of local anesthetics's allergy, infection at the injection side, anatomical abnormalities, coagulopaty, bleeding disease, liver disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Cyna AM, Middleton P. Caudal epidural block versus other methods of postoperative pain relief for circumcision in boys. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003005.pub2.
PMID: 18843636BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assoc prof
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 20, 2017
First Posted
August 23, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 17, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share