Comparison Between Intrathecal and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine
Comparison Study Between Intrathecal and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine in Lower Limb Surgeries
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A prospective, randomized, comparative controlled clinical trial, aiming to compare the use of intrathecal dexmedetomidine by intravenous dexmedetomidine in concern of the first request to analgesia. The secondary end-points were the total postoperative analgesic consumption as well as the VAS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 5, 2020
CompletedMay 7, 2020
May 1, 2020
8 months
April 28, 2020
May 6, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
First request to analgesia
The first time the patient is asking for analgesia to control his pain
Postoperative up to 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Total postoperative analgesia consumption
Postoperative up to 24 hours
visual analogue scale
Every two hours for 24 hours postoperative
Study Arms (2)
IT intrathecal
ACTIVE COMPARATORadministration of intrathecal dexmedetomidine in addition to bupivacaine for lower limb surgeries
IV intravenous
ACTIVE COMPARATORadministration of intravenous dexmedetomidine in addition to spinal anaesthesia for lower limb surgeries
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I-II patients
- age 18-65 years
- scheduled for lower limb surgery
- spinal anaesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- patients with coagulopathy
- infection at the site of lumbar puncture
- beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers usage
- hypersensitivity to Bupivacaine or Dexmedetomidine
- any other contra-indications for spinal anaesthesia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Suez Canal University
Ismailia, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdelrhman Alshawadfy, MD
Suez Canal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- double blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of anesthesia and intensive care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2020
First Posted
May 5, 2020
Study Start
March 1, 2019
Primary Completion
October 30, 2019
Study Completion
March 30, 2020
Last Updated
May 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share