Novel Meal Service Improves Nutritional Intake
A Novel In-hospital Meal Service Improves Protein and Energy Intake
1 other identifier
observational
637
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to investigate whether a novel meal service FoodforCare (FfC), comprising 6-protein-rich meals a day following proactive advice from a nutritional assistant, improves dietary intake and patient satisfaction, compared to the traditional 3-meals a day service (TMS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 28, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 22, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2017
CompletedJune 22, 2017
May 1, 2017
1.4 years
June 2, 2017
June 21, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Protein intake day 1 (gram)
The percentage of protein intake (gram) relative to requirements (1.2 gram/kilogram bodyweight) on the first day of full oral intake.
1 day
Protein intake day 4 (gram)
The percentage of protein intake (gram) relative to requirements (1.2 gram/kilogram bodyweight) on the fourth day of full oral intake.
4 days
Energy intake day 1 (kcal)
The percentage of energy intake (kcal) relative to requirements (Harris \& Benedict formula \* 1.3) on the first day of full oral intake.
1 day
Energy intake day 4 (kcal)
The percentage of energy intake (kcal) relative to requirements (Harris \& Benedict formula \* 1.3) on the fourth day of full oral intake.
4 days
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Patients' satisfaction (food appreciation and access to food)
3 day
Patients' satisfaction (food quality and meal service)
3 day
Change in nutritional status (body weight)
4 days
Change in nutritional status (handgrip strength)
4 days
Nutritional status (height)
1 day
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Traditional meal service
TMS consists of three meals served by nutritional assistants throughout the day. Preference for dinner can be indicated in the morning by the individual patient from a menu list with predefined choices for meat, potatoes/rice/pasta and vegetables with various portion sizes.
FoodforCare
FfC consists of a 6-meals per day service. At bedside, patients are offered one or more small protein-rich dishes from a choice of 3. Nutritional assistants play a key role in recommending and delivering these protein-rich meals and assist patient in choosing the most optimal dish, based on the patient's nutrition order in the electronic patient record.
Interventions
The type of meal service in the hospital (usual care)
Eligibility Criteria
Patients admitted to the Departments of Gastroenterology, Urology/Gynaecology and Orthopedics.
You may qualify if:
- Dutch speaking
- Aged 18 years or older
- Exclusively oral intake
- Expected hospital stay of at least 1 day
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with tube- or parenteral feeding
- A language barrier
- Considered to be too weak to adequately answer our questions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (17)
Stratton RJ, Hackston A, Longmore D, Dixon R, Price S, Stroud M, King C, Elia M. Malnutrition in hospital outpatients and inpatients: prevalence, concurrent validity and ease of use of the 'malnutrition universal screening tool' ('MUST') for adults. Br J Nutr. 2004 Nov;92(5):799-808. doi: 10.1079/bjn20041258.
PMID: 15533269BACKGROUNDNorman K, Pichard C, Lochs H, Pirlich M. Prognostic impact of disease-related malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2008 Feb;27(1):5-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.10.007. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
PMID: 18061312BACKGROUNDKondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M; Educational and Clinical Practice Committee, European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN). ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr. 2003 Aug;22(4):415-21. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(03)00098-0.
PMID: 12880610BACKGROUNDLucy Kok RS. Ondervoeding onderschat. De kosten van ondervoeding en het rendement van medische voeding. Amsterdam: SEO economisch onderzoek, 2014.
BACKGROUNDBeck AM, Balknas UN, Furst P, Hasunen K, Jones L, Keller U, Melchior JC, Mikkelsen BE, Schauder P, Sivonen L, Zinck O, Oien H, Ovesen L; Council of Europe (the Committee of Experts on Nutrition, Food Safety and Consumer Health of the Partial Agreement in the Social and Public Health Field). Food and nutritional care in hospitals: how to prevent undernutrition--report and guidelines from the Council of Europe. Clin Nutr. 2001 Oct;20(5):455-60. doi: 10.1054/clnu.2001.0494.
PMID: 11534942BACKGROUNDHealth Do. Essence of Care. Patient-focused benchmarks for clinical governance. Publication. London: NHS Modernisation Agency potDoH; 2003.
BACKGROUNDvan Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA, Roosemalen MM, Weijs PJ, Langius JA. High waste contributes to low food intake in hospitalized patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;27(2):274-80. doi: 10.1177/0884533611433602. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
PMID: 22378801BACKGROUNDHiesmayr M, Schindler K, Pernicka E, Schuh C, Schoeniger-Hekele A, Bauer P, Laviano A, Lovell AD, Mouhieddine M, Schuetz T, Schneider SM, Singer P, Pichard C, Howard P, Jonkers C, Grecu I, Ljungqvist O; NutritionDay Audit Team. Decreased food intake is a risk factor for mortality in hospitalised patients: the NutritionDay survey 2006. Clin Nutr. 2009 Oct;28(5):484-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.013. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
PMID: 19573957BACKGROUNDNaithani S, Thomas JE, Whelan K, Morgan M, Gulliford MC. Experiences of food access in hospital. A new questionnaire measure. Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;28(6):625-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.04.020. Epub 2009 May 27.
PMID: 19477558BACKGROUNDWall BT, van Loon LJ. Nutritional strategies to attenuate muscle disuse atrophy. Nutr Rev. 2013 Apr;71(4):195-208. doi: 10.1111/nure.12019. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
PMID: 23550781BACKGROUNDInspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg (IGZ). Kwaliteitsindicatoren 2014 basisset ziekenhuizen. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport, 2014
BACKGROUNDMueller C, Compher C, Ellen DM; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) Board of Directors. A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: Nutrition screening, assessment, and intervention in adults. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011 Jan;35(1):16-24. doi: 10.1177/0148607110389335. No abstract available.
PMID: 21224430BACKGROUNDMulasi U, Kuchnia AJ, Cole AJ, Earthman CP. Bioimpedance at the bedside: current applications, limitations, and opportunities. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015 Apr;30(2):180-93. doi: 10.1177/0884533614568155. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
PMID: 25613832BACKGROUNDFlood A, Chung A, Parker H, Kearns V, O'Sullivan TA. The use of hand grip strength as a predictor of nutrition status in hospital patients. Clin Nutr. 2014 Feb;33(1):106-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
PMID: 23615623BACKGROUNDDodds RM, Syddall HE, Cooper R, Benzeval M, Deary IJ, Dennison EM, Der G, Gale CR, Inskip HM, Jagger C, Kirkwood TB, Lawlor DA, Robinson SM, Starr JM, Steptoe A, Tilling K, Kuh D, Cooper C, Sayer AA. Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 4;9(12):e113637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113637. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25474696BACKGROUNDVera Todorovic CRaME. THE 'MUST' EXPLANATORY BOOKLET. A Guide to the 'Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool' ('MUST') for Adults. UK: 2011.
BACKGROUNDDijxhoorn DN, van den Berg MGA, Kievit W, Korzilius J, Drenth JPH, Wanten GJA. A novel in-hospital meal service improves protein and energy intake. Clin Nutr. 2018 Dec;37(6 Pt A):2238-2245. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
PMID: 29173893DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Geert Wanten, MD, PhD, MSc
Radboud University Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2017
First Posted
June 22, 2017
Study Start
July 28, 2015
Primary Completion
December 22, 2016
Study Completion
December 22, 2016
Last Updated
June 22, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share