Translating Adoption of Improved Varieties Into Nutritional Impact
QPM
1 other identifier
interventional
978
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purposes of this study are (1) to determine whether child nutrition-focused adoption encouragement messages focused on Quality Protein Maize (QPM) and the availability of small quantities of QPM seed can be effective at increasing QPM adoption and health outcomes for young children, and (2) to determine whether consumption encouragement messages and techniques (e.g., containers for earmarking) can be effective at increasing QPM targeting to and health outcomes for young children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 9, 2017
March 1, 2017
1 year
February 29, 2016
March 8, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (33)
Consumption of any QPM by the index child in the last 24 hours
6-7 months
Amount of QPM consumed by the index child in the last 24 hours
6-7 months
Index child's proportion of total maize consumption that was QPM in the last 24 hours
6-7 months
Consumption of any QPM by the index child in the last week
6-7 months
Number of days in the last week that the index child ate any QPM
6-7 months
Number of days in the last week that caregiver cooked a QPM-based food that was primarily for target children
6-7 months
Height-for-age Z-score of index child
6-7 months
Weight-for-height Z-score of index child
6-7 months
Weight-for-age Z-score of index child
6-7 months
Mid-upper arm circumference-for-age Z-score of index child
6-7 months
Insulin-like growth factor I (continuous measurement)
6-7 months
Amount of QPM reserved for home consumption
6-7 months
Hectares of QPM planted
6-7 months
Serum transthyretin
6-7 months
Consumption of any QPM by the index child in the last 24 hours
10-11 months
Amount of QPM consumed by the index child in the last 24 hours
10-11 months
Index child's proportion of total maize consumption that was QPM in the last 24 hours
10-11 months
Consumption of any QPM by the index child in the last week
10-11 months
Number of days in the last week that the index child ate any QPM
10-11 months
Number of days in the last week that caregiver cooked a QPM-based food that was primarily for target children
10-11 months
Height-for-age Z-score of index child
10-11 months
Weight-for-height Z-score of index child
10-11 months
Weight-for-age Z-score of index child
10-11 months
Mid-upper arm circumference-for-age Z-score of index child
10-11 months
Amount of QPM reserved for home consumption
10-11 months
Change in Height-for-age Z-score of index child
6-7 months
Change in Height-for-age Z-score of index child
10-11 months
Change in Weight-for-height Z-score of index child
6-7 months
Change in Weight-for-height Z-score of index child
10-11 months
Change in Mid-upper arm circumference-for-age Z-score of index child
6-7 months
Change in Mid-upper arm circumference-for-age Z-score of index child
10-11 months
Change in Weight-for-age Z-score of index child
6-7 months
Change in Weight-for-age Z-score of index child
10-11 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Serum lysine
6-7 months
Serum tryptophan
6-7 months
Study Arms (3)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONHouseholds in the control group receive no special treatment.
Adoption Encouragement Treatment
EXPERIMENTALHouseholds in the Adoption Encouragement Treatment group were visited between March and April 2015 and offered "child nutrition focused" adoption encouragement. Both the male household head and the primary female caregiver were invited to attend these meetings (though the household head is the primary target), where the nutritional benefits of Quality Protein Maize (QPM) adoption for children were emphasized along with the agronomic properties. In addition, the fact that only small amounts of QPM are necessary to nourish children was highlighted and small seed bag sizes were offered. During the adoption encouragement visit, we offered the option to order up to three 2 kg bags of QPM for free.
Consumption Encouragement Treatment
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to receiving the Adoption Encouragement Treatment, households in the Consumption Encouragement Treatment group received additional information, targeted to the caregiver, and tools for separating Quality Protein Maize and targeting it to young children in the household in August 2015. They will additionally receive further guidance in February 2016.
Interventions
Households in the Adoption Encouragement Treatment received child nutrition focused guidance on the nutritional and agronomic benefits of Quality Protein Maize (QPM) adoption, and the opportunity to order up to 6 kg of QPM seed to plant in their own fields.
Households in the Consumption Encouragement Treatment received the same guidance as households in the Adoption Encouragement Treatment, as well as additional guidance on the importance of specifically targeting foods made with QPM to young children and tools to help households keep the grain separate and remember to feed QPM-based foods to the young children.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Households in the study areas that do not have a member who attends a field day demonstrating Quality Protein Maize or who do not have a child in the appropriate age range are excluded from the study. Furthermore, households where the mother or children did not intend on staying in the region for the study duration (until the completion of the endline survey) were excluded from the study. Finally, we excluded participants who do not have access to land for crop cultivation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (7)
Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, de Onis M, Ezzati M, Grantham-McGregor S, Katz J, Martorell R, Uauy R; Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):427-451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
PMID: 23746772BACKGROUNDVictora CG, Adair L, Fall C, Hallal PC, Martorell R, Richter L, Sachdev HS; Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group. Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital. Lancet. 2008 Jan 26;371(9609):340-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61692-4.
PMID: 18206223BACKGROUNDRuel MT, Alderman H; Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition? Lancet. 2013 Aug 10;382(9891):536-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60843-0. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
PMID: 23746780BACKGROUNDMasset E, Haddad L, Cornelius A, Isaza-Castro J. Effectiveness of agricultural interventions that aim to improve nutritional status of children: systematic review. BMJ. 2012 Jan 17;344:d8222. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d8222.
PMID: 22251864BACKGROUNDGirard AW, Self JL, McAuliffe C, Olude O. The effects of household food production strategies on the health and nutrition outcomes of women and young children: a systematic review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;26 Suppl 1:205-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01282.x.
PMID: 22742612BACKGROUNDGhosh S, Suri D, Uauy R. Assessment of protein adequacy in developing countries: quality matters. Br J Nutr. 2012 Aug;108 Suppl 2:S77-87. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512002577.
PMID: 23107551BACKGROUNDDonato K, McConnell M, Han D, Gunaratna NS, Tessema M, De Groote H, Cohen J. Behavioural insights to support increased consumption of quality protein maize by young children: a cluster randomised trial in Ethiopia. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12):e002705. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002705.
PMID: 33355261DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jessica Cohen, PhD
Harvard Chan School of Public Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Global Health
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 29, 2016
First Posted
March 17, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 9, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
We will share completely deidentified data upon request after primary analyses have been been completed.