Randomized Controlled Trial of Prenatal Coparenting Intervention (CoparentRCT)
CoparentRCT
2 other identifiers
interventional
276
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This R01 tests through RCT methodology efficacy of a new intervention designed specifically to aid development of positive coparenting alliances between at-risk (unmarried, uncoupled, low income) African American mothers and fathers having a first baby together.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 26, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 18, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 18, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 15, 2022
CompletedDecember 15, 2022
January 1, 2022
6.2 years
December 2, 2016
July 25, 2022
November 17, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (17)
System for Coding Interactions in Dyads (SCID) Positive Communication Patterns
Composite of SCID observational measures of positive mother-father interaction (Problem Solving Communication\*\*, Support\*\*, Cohesiveness\*, Withdrawal\*\*, Positive Affect\*\*) \* Couple variable, there is only one score for the couple. \*\* Individual variable, there are two separate scores for mothers and fathers separately. Each sub-scale scores range from 1 to 5. Total scale scores were combined by averaging the individual and couple scales, with higher scores indicating more positive patterns in couple interaction (total scale score range 1-5). Change from Prenatal to 3 months post-partum is evaluated.
Prenatal and 3 months post-partum
System for Coding Interactions in Dyads (SCID) Negative Communication Patterns
Composite of SCID observational measures of negative mother-father interaction (Negative Escalation\*, Verbal Aggression\*\*, Attempts to Control\*\*, Negativity/conflict\*\*, Coerciveness\*\*, Dysphoric Affect\*\*) \* Couple variable, there is only one score for the couple. \*\* Individual variable, there are two separate scores for mothers and fathers separately. Each sub-scale scores range from 1 to 5. Total scale scores were combined by summing up the individual scales, with higher scores indicating more negative patterns in couple interaction. Each sub-scale scores range from 1 to 5. Total scale scores were combined by averaging the individual and couple scales, with higher scores indicating more positive patterns in couple interaction (total scale score range 1-5). Change from prenatal to 3 months post-partum is evaluated.
Prenatal and 3 months post-partum
System for Coding Interactions in Dyads (SCID) Positive Communication Patterns
Composite of SCID observational measures of positive mother-father interaction (Problem Solving Communication\*\*, Support\*\*, Cohesiveness\*, Withdrawal\*\*, Positive Affect\*\*) \* Couple variable, there is only one score for the couple. \*\* Individual variable, there are two separate scores for mothers and fathers separately. Each sub-scale scores range from 1 to 5. Total scale scores were combined by averaging the individual and couple scales, with higher scores indicating more positive patterns in couple interaction (total scale score range 1-5). Change from prenatal to 12 months post-partum is evaluated.
Prenatal and 12 months post-partum
System for Coding Interactions in Dyads (SCID) Negative Communication Patterns
Composite of SCID observational measures of negative mother-father interaction (Negative Escalation\*, Verbal Aggression\*\*, Attempts to Control\*\*, Negativity/conflict\*\*, Coerciveness\*\*, Dysphoric Affect\*\*) \* Couple variable, there is only one score for the couple. \*\* Individual variable, there are two separate scores for mothers and fathers separately. Each sub-scale scores range from 1 to 5. Total scale scores were combined by averaging the individual and couple scales, with higher scores indicating more positive patterns in couple interaction (total scale score range 1-5). Change from prenatal to 12 months post-partum is evaluated.
Prenatal and 12 months post-partum
Coparenting and Family Rating Scale (CFRS) Coparent Solidarity/Family Harmony
Composite of CFRS observational measures of warmth (range 1-7), cooperation (range 1-7), and sensitivity (range 1-7) and negatively loaded disengagement (range 1-7). Total scale scores were combined by averaging up the sub-scale scores, with higher values indicating better coparent solidarity/family harmony (total scale score range 1-7).
3 months post-partum
Coparenting and Family Rating Scale (CFRS) Coparent Negativity/Hostility & Competitiveness
Composite CFRS observational measures of competition (range 1-7), over stimulation (range 1-7), and verbal sparring (range 1-5). Total scale scores were combined by averaging up the sub-scale scores, with higher values indicating better coparent solidarity/family harmony (total scale score range 1-7).
3 months post-partum
Coparenting and Family Rating Scale (CFRS) Coparent Solidarity/Family Harmony
Composite of CFRS observational measures of warmth (range 1-7), cooperation (range 1-7), and sensitivity (range 1-7) and negatively loaded disengagement (range 1-7). Total scale scores were combined by averaging up the sub-scale scores, with higher values indicating better coparent solidarity/family harmony (total scale score range 1-7).
12 months post-partum
Coparenting and Family Rating Scale (CFRS) Coparent Negativity/Hostility & Competitiveness
Composite CFRS observational measures of competition (range 1-7), over stimulation (range 1-7), and verbal sparring (range 1-5). Total scale scores were combined by averaging up the sub-scale scores, with higher values indicating better coparent solidarity/family harmony (total scale score range 1-7).
12 months post-partum
Perceived Coparenting Solidarity as Measured by Parenting Alliance Measure (PAM) Communication Subscale
Scores on Parenting Alliance Measure range from 20 to 100 with higher scores indicating more positive perceived alliance between parents. Scores on the Communication subscale range from 17 to 85.
12 months post-partum compared to 3 months post-partum
Perceived Coparenting Solidarity as Measured by Parenting Alliance Measure (PAM) Respect Subscale
Scores on Parenting Alliance Measure range from 20 to 100 with higher scores indicating more positive perceived alliance between parents. Scores on the Respect subscale range from 3 to 15.
12 months post-partum compared to 3 months post-partum
Intimate Partner Violence as Assessed by the Psychological Aggression Scale of the Revised-Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2; Straus et al., 1996).
Scores on the Psychological Aggression Scale range from 0 to 175 and higher scores indicate more frequent acts of psychological aggression by partner.
12 months post-partum compared to 3 months post-partum
Infant Socio-emotional Competencies as Assessed by the Negative Emotionality Scale of the Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (ITSEA; Carter & Briggs-Gowan, 2006)
Items are rated on the following 3-point scale: (0) Not true/rarely, (1) Somewhat true/sometimes, and (2) Very true/often. A "No opportunity" code allows parents to indicate that they have not had the opportunity to observe certain behaviors (e.g., behavior with peers). Scores on Negative Emotionality scale which includes 13 items range from 0 to 26 with higher scores are considered indicative of a deficit or delay.
12 months post-partum
Infant Socio-emotional Competencies as Assessed by the Aggression Scale of the Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (ITSEA; Carter & Briggs-Gowan, 2006)
Items are rated on the following 3-point scale: (0) Not true/rarely, (1) Somewhat true/sometimes, and (2) Very true/often. A "No opportunity" code allows parents to indicate that they have not had the opportunity to observe certain behaviors (e.g., behavior with peers). Scores on the Aggression Scale which includes 12 items range from 0 to 24 and higher scores are considered indicative of a deficit or delay.
12 months post-partum
Infant Socio-emotional Competencies as Assessed by the Compliance Scale of the Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (ITSEA; Carter & Briggs-Gowan, 2006)
Items are rated on the following 3-point scale: (0) Not true/rarely, (1) Somewhat true/sometimes, and (2) Very true/often. A "No opportunity" code allows parents to indicate that they have not had the opportunity to observe certain behaviors (e.g., behavior with peers). Scores on Compliance Scale which includes 8 items range from 0 to16 with lower scores considered indicative of a deficit or delay.
12 months post-partum
Infant Socio-emotional Competencies as Assessed by the Sleep Scale of the Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (ITSEA; Carter & Briggs-Gowan, 2006)
Items are rated on the following 3-point scale: (0) Not true/rarely, (1) Somewhat true/sometimes, and (2) Very true/often. A "No opportunity" code allows parents to indicate that they have not had the opportunity to observe certain behaviors (e.g., behavior with peers). Scores on the Sleep Scale which includes 5 items range from 0 to 10 with higher scores considered indicative of a deficit or delay.
12 months post-partum
Father Engagement as Assessed by the Activities With Child Scale (Cabrera et al., 2004).
This self report consists of 34 items on which the parent reports the frequency with which the father was engaged in various activities with the child in the past month. Questions were answered on a Likert-type scale from 1 (more than once a day) to 6 (not at all); all items were reverse scored such that higher scores reflect more frequent activity. Father engagement is assessed across six sub-scales (Socialization - 11 items, Management- 3 items, Didactic - 7 items, Physical play/warmth - 6 items, Caregiving - 7 items) with composite scores computed by averaging responses across items. Scores range from 34 to 204 for the total scale. Higher scores reflect more frequent activity with the child.
12 months post-partum
Father Involvement as Assessed by the Father Involvement Scale (Coley & Moris, 2002)
A composite score based on sum of items ranges between 6 to 24 with higher scores signifying greater paternal involvement.
3 months post-partum
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Infant Eye Gaze Triangular Engagement
12 months compared to 3 months
Infant Eye Gaze Triangular Monitoring
12 months compared to 3 months
Infant Eye Gaze Triangular Tension
12 months compared to 3 months
Infant Eye Gaze Triangular Protest
12 months compared to 3 months
Other Outcomes (5)
Recent Depressive Symptomatology as Gauged by the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS; Cox et al., 1987)
3 months post-partum compared to baseline
Recent Depressive Symptomatology as Gauged by the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS; Cox et al., 1987)
12 months post-partum compared to Baseline
Level of Individual Parenting Stress as Assessed by the Parenting Stress Index Short Form (PSI-SF; Abidin, 1995) Parental Distress Subscale
12 months post-partum compared to 3 months post-partum
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention: Treatment as Usual + Focused Coparenting Consult
EXPERIMENTALReceipt of Treatment As Usual/Resource and Referral supports, plus opportunity to complete six 90-minute Focused Coparenting Consultation (FCC) sessions followed by one postnatal booster session designed to strengthen the mother-father coparenting alliance
Control: Treatment as Usual
NO INTERVENTIONReceipt of TAU/Resource and Referral supports
Interventions
Six 90-minute sessions completed within 10 weeks address importance of coparenting for child development; overcoming challenges to coparenting collaboratively; anger and conflict management and communication skills. Parents develop a coparenting plan to support one another's involvement as parents to the baby. A 90-minute booster session one month after the baby's birth reinforces lessons learned in the 6-session intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- An applicant is considered eligible if the pregnancy is the mother's first with the baby's father; the mother and father are unmarried; and reported income places at or below the county and state poverty line. The target population is African American, but mixed race parents may also enroll so long as at least one parent is African American. Minor parents will be recruited only if legally emancipated or with consent of their parent or guardian (with an exception allowed if minor parent is estranged from parent or LAR). If a potential participant reports a prior history of IPV, s/he may still be eligible for participation pending a more detailed assessment completed by trained project staff using the Danger Assessment Scale (Campbell, 2003).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
Related Publications (1)
McHale JP, Stover CS, Dube C, Sirotkin YS, Lewis S, McKay K. A culturally grounded prenatal coparenting intervention: Results of a randomized controlled trial with unmarried Black parents. J Fam Psychol. 2022 Jun;36(4):479-489. doi: 10.1037/fam0000965. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
PMID: 35084880RESULT
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. James McHale
- Organization
- University of South Florida
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James P McHale, PhD
University of South Florida
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2016
First Posted
March 31, 2017
Study Start
September 26, 2015
Primary Completion
December 18, 2021
Study Completion
December 18, 2021
Last Updated
December 15, 2022
Results First Posted
December 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Starting 6 months after publication for 5 years.
- Access Criteria
- Any request for study data which meets reasonable standards of scientific integrity will be considered by the study investigators, with the expectation that any costs incurred in providing such data accrued from this project will be covered by the requesting investigator.
Once all data collection for this project has been completed and study results published, study data stripped of all subject identifiers will be available upon request, provided through electronic means in the original data management files, to qualified researchers.