Validity Assessment of the "LabForGames Warning" Serious Game
1 other identifier
observational
71
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of simulation in medical education has been associated with positive results in the acquisition of knowledge, skills, behaviors and patient outcome. Serious games are useful educational tools since they allow both theory and practice training for an important number of learners, simultaneously. However, few studies have evaluated the validity and effectiveness of serious games. Our simulation unit (LabForSIMS- Faculté de Médecine Paris-Sud, France) has developed a serious game named "LabForGames Warning" for nursing students with the following learning objectives: to recognize and to address the degradation of a patient's clinical condition and to work on the issue of inter-professional communication. The aim of the present study is to determine content and construct validities of the "LabForGames Warning" serious game before its use as a healthcare professional training tool.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 28, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2017
CompletedNovember 23, 2018
November 1, 2018
7 months
March 14, 2017
November 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The score (/100) of each case of the serious game
The score (/100) of each case of the serious game will be reported in order to assess whether the difference of the measures is related to the difference of skills between the three groups (Evaluation of the construct validity). An auto-evaluation of clinical reasoning will also be recorded.
60 min
the duration (min) of each case of the serious game
The duration (min) of each case of the serious game will be reported in order to assess whether the difference of the measures is related to the difference of skills between the three groups (Evaluation of the construct validity).
60 min
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The content and parameters of the serious game
30 min
Learners' satisfaction
5 min
The resemblance between the virtual game and the real life clinical practice
25 min
Study Arms (3)
"Nursing students" group
nursing students
"New nurses" group
Nurses with \< 2 years experience
"Expert nurses" group
Intensive nurses (with ≥ 4 years experience post graduate)
Interventions
During three hours, each learner will play with the three different cases of the "LabForGames Warning" serious game.
Eligibility Criteria
Voluntary divided into three groups : * "Nursing students" group * "New nurses" group: Nurses with \< 2 years experience * "Expert nurses" group: Intensive nurses (with ≥ 4 years experience post graduate)
You may qualify if:
- Nursing students or nurses with \< 2 years experience or intensive nurses (with ≥ 4 years experience post graduate)
- and having agreed to participate
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects incapable of giving consent: incapacitated (subjects under guardianship), minors (\< 18 years)
- Refusal to participate in to the study Refusal to sign in the confidentiality clause
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculté de médecine Paris Sud
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94276, France
Related Publications (1)
Blanie A, Amorim MA, Meffert A, Perrot C, Dondelli L, Benhamou D. Assessing validity evidence for a serious game dedicated to patient clinical deterioration and communication. Adv Simul (Lond). 2020 May 27;5:4. doi: 10.1186/s41077-020-00123-3. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32514382DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Antonia Blanié, M.D
Université Paris Sud, 91 400 Orsay, France
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Antonia Blanie M D
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2017
First Posted
March 28, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 30, 2017
Study Completion
September 30, 2017
Last Updated
November 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11