A Validation Study of a Computerized Movement Analysis of the Colonoscope in Simulated Colonoscopy
3D-CoPS
A Validation Study of the 3D-CoPS and 3D-CoRS and Its Relationship With an International Acknowledged Assessment Tool (ETS) in Simulated Colonoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A cross validation study comparing an international acknowledged assessment tool "Endoscopy Training System" (ETS) and movement analysis of the colonoscope based on raw data from coils within the scope. 24 physicians are recruited and divided based on experience (novices and experienced). All participants are to perform twice on the ETS that is based on four tasks; Scope manipulation, tool targeting, loop management and mucosal inspection. The movement of the colonoscope will be gathered during the tasks and correlated to the scores of the ETS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 17, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 21, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2018
CompletedApril 11, 2018
April 1, 2018
4 months
December 22, 2017
April 10, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score
The score is based on a movement analysis of the colonoscope from anus until max insertion(cecum). It is scaled from 0-1000 .A score of zero equals an incomplete procedure and a score of 1 is a very poor score but the cecum was reached. Increasing score represents better technical performance with a maximum score of 1000.
3 months
3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score
The score is based on a movement analysis of the colonoscope from cecum to the anus. It is scaled from 0-1000. A score of zero equals a very poor score, Increasing score represents better technical performance with a maximum score of 1000.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Relationship to other variables
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Novices
OTHERAny physician who has no experience of endoscopies or has done no more than 50 colonoscopies. Each subject included are to perform on the Endoscopy Training System (ETS) during which data for 3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score and 3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score is gathered.
Experienced
OTHERIncludes any physician who have succeeded more than 140 colonoscopies. Professional backgrounds include surgeons and gastroenterologists. Each subject included are to perform on the ETS during which data for 3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score and 3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score is gathered.
Interventions
3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score is a computerized analysis of the movement of the colonoscope based on data from coils within the colonoscope.
The Endoscopy Training System is based on the Colonoscopy Training Model platform and includes four different performance metrics and a scoring system. 1. Scope Manipulation - The use of torque and tip deflection to move a shape in the colon 2. Tool Targeting - 10 targets located around the colon must be found. With a biopsy forceps, each target has to been touched. 3. Loop Management - The management of a standard alfa-loop. 4. Mucosal Inspection - Randomly placed polyps inside the rubber colon have to be found during withdrawal.
3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score is a computerized analysis of the movement of the colonoscope based on data from coils within the colonoscope.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Physicians
You may not qualify if:
- Non physicians
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rigshospitalet, Denmarklead
- Technical University of Denmarkcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Copenhagen Acedemy of Medical Education and Simulation
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Related Publications (2)
Ritter EM, Cox TC, Trinca KD, Pearl JP. Simulated Colonoscopy Objective Performance Evaluation (SCOPE): a non-computer-based tool for assessment of endoscopic skills. Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4073-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3063-8. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
PMID: 23860607BACKGROUNDTrinca KD, Cox TC, Pearl JP, Ritter EM. Validity evidence for the Simulated Colonoscopy Objective Performance Evaluation scoring system. Am J Surg. 2014 Feb;207(2):218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.026. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
PMID: 24246259BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lars Konge, Prof
CAMES-Rigshospitalet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- This is a vialidation study of a computerized analysis of the colonoscope movements during a simulated procedure.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD. Andreas Slot Vilmann
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2017
First Posted
January 17, 2018
Study Start
December 1, 2017
Primary Completion
March 21, 2018
Study Completion
March 30, 2018
Last Updated
April 11, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share