NCT03401723

Brief Summary

A cross validation study comparing an international acknowledged assessment tool "Endoscopy Training System" (ETS) and movement analysis of the colonoscope based on raw data from coils within the scope. 24 physicians are recruited and divided based on experience (novices and experienced). All participants are to perform twice on the ETS that is based on four tasks; Scope manipulation, tool targeting, loop management and mucosal inspection. The movement of the colonoscope will be gathered during the tasks and correlated to the scores of the ETS.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2017

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 22, 2017

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 17, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 21, 2018

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 11, 2018

Status Verified

April 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

December 22, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 10, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Validation studySimulationEndoscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • 3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score

    The score is based on a movement analysis of the colonoscope from anus until max insertion(cecum). It is scaled from 0-1000 .A score of zero equals an incomplete procedure and a score of 1 is a very poor score but the cecum was reached. Increasing score represents better technical performance with a maximum score of 1000.

    3 months

  • 3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score

    The score is based on a movement analysis of the colonoscope from cecum to the anus. It is scaled from 0-1000. A score of zero equals a very poor score, Increasing score represents better technical performance with a maximum score of 1000.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Relationship to other variables

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Novices

OTHER

Any physician who has no experience of endoscopies or has done no more than 50 colonoscopies. Each subject included are to perform on the Endoscopy Training System (ETS) during which data for 3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score and 3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score is gathered.

Other: 3D-Colonoscopy Progression ScoreOther: Endoscopy Training SystemOther: 3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score

Experienced

OTHER

Includes any physician who have succeeded more than 140 colonoscopies. Professional backgrounds include surgeons and gastroenterologists. Each subject included are to perform on the ETS during which data for 3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score and 3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score is gathered.

Other: 3D-Colonoscopy Progression ScoreOther: Endoscopy Training SystemOther: 3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score

Interventions

3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score is a computerized analysis of the movement of the colonoscope based on data from coils within the colonoscope.

Also known as: 3D-CoPS
ExperiencedNovices

The Endoscopy Training System is based on the Colonoscopy Training Model platform and includes four different performance metrics and a scoring system. 1. Scope Manipulation - The use of torque and tip deflection to move a shape in the colon 2. Tool Targeting - 10 targets located around the colon must be found. With a biopsy forceps, each target has to been touched. 3. Loop Management - The management of a standard alfa-loop. 4. Mucosal Inspection - Randomly placed polyps inside the rubber colon have to be found during withdrawal.

Also known as: ETS
ExperiencedNovices

3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score is a computerized analysis of the movement of the colonoscope based on data from coils within the colonoscope.

Also known as: 3D-CoRS
ExperiencedNovices

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Physicians

You may not qualify if:

  • Non physicians

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Copenhagen Acedemy of Medical Education and Simulation

Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Ritter EM, Cox TC, Trinca KD, Pearl JP. Simulated Colonoscopy Objective Performance Evaluation (SCOPE): a non-computer-based tool for assessment of endoscopic skills. Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4073-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3063-8. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

    PMID: 23860607BACKGROUND
  • Trinca KD, Cox TC, Pearl JP, Ritter EM. Validity evidence for the Simulated Colonoscopy Objective Performance Evaluation scoring system. Am J Surg. 2014 Feb;207(2):218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.026. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

    PMID: 24246259BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Lars Konge, Prof

    CAMES-Rigshospitalet

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
This is a vialidation study of a computerized analysis of the colonoscope movements during a simulated procedure.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD. Andreas Slot Vilmann

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2017

First Posted

January 17, 2018

Study Start

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion

March 21, 2018

Study Completion

March 30, 2018

Last Updated

April 11, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations