Protein Source, Nutrition Messaging, and Food Intake
Evaluating How Breakfast Protein Source Affects Satiety, Glucose and Food Preference
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to determine how the protein source and the physical form of food consumed at breakfast impact food intake. Research will be conducted by assessing feelings of hunger, food preference and blood glucose in healthy adults following the ingestion protein-based (animal versus plant) drinks similar calorie and protein content.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable obesity
Started Feb 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2017
CompletedMarch 17, 2017
March 1, 2017
3 months
March 9, 2017
March 13, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Appetite assessment
Appetite was assessed using visual analog scales
2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Snack intake using checklist
1 hour
Study Arms (2)
Educational Messaging
ACTIVE COMPARATORWhey protein beverage and pea protein beverages administered in a randomized order with a one- to two-week washout period between beverages.
No Messaging
ACTIVE COMPARATORWhey protein beverage and pea protein beverages administered in a randomized order with a one- to two-week washout period between beverages.
Interventions
Beverage administered and postprandial appetite assessed for 2 hours followed by 1 hour monitoring of food intake from ad libitum snack tray.
Beverage administered and postprandial appetite assessed for 2 hours followed by 1 hour monitoring of food intake from ad libitum snack tray.
Items were selected from a snack tray filled with healthy and unhealthy snacks in order to determine if educational messaging influenced snack choices. Shack choices wre recorded on a check list by a third party observer.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy, no known health conditions
You may not qualify if:
- Taking medication, excluding hormonal birth control
- Food allergies
- Food intolerances
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72704, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2017
First Posted
March 17, 2017
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 15, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 17, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share