NCT02981667

Brief Summary

Previous research is equivocal concerning if high intensity interval training is viewed as more aversive versus moderate exercise. Our data in active men and women showed that interval training is viewed as more enjoyable than higher volume moderate exercise.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 29, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

December 5, 2016

Status Verified

November 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

November 29, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 2, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Physical activity enjoyment score (PACES)

    This is an 18-item categorical survey used to assess participants' enjoyment of the bout of physical activity that was just completed

    This was measured 10 min post-exercise in all participants during the 3 mo of data collection.

  • Oxygen uptake

    Oxygen uptake (VO2) represents mitochondrial consumption of oxygen to drive cellular metabolism generating ATP to support muscular contraction.

    Measured continuously during exercise during the 3 mo of data collection.

Study Arms (1)

Active men and women

Healthy, active men and women ages 18-45 yr completed 1 bout of high intensity interval training and moderate intensity continuous training in a randomized, crossover design.

Other: Exercise intensity

Interventions

Participants were randomized to 1 or 2 exercise intensities, moderate or high (interval training).

Active men and women

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Habitually active young men and women ages 18-45 yr

You may qualify if:

  • Habitually active, healthy, non-obese

You may not qualify if:

  • Sedentary, unhealthy, joint pain precluding tolerance to exercise

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Thum JS, Parsons G, Whittle T, Astorino TA. High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0166299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166299. eCollection 2017.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

High-Intensity Interval Training

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Physical Conditioning, HumanExerciseMotor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CROSSOVER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, Dept. of Kinesiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2016

First Posted

December 5, 2016

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

December 5, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Data are accepted for publication in PLoS One, an open-access journal, which makes the aggregate data available to all researchers.