Higher Enjoyment in Response to High Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise
Enjoyment Responses to High Intensity Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise
1 other identifier
observational
12
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Previous research is equivocal concerning if high intensity interval training is viewed as more aversive versus moderate exercise. Our data in active men and women showed that interval training is viewed as more enjoyable than higher volume moderate exercise.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Sep 2015
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2016
CompletedDecember 5, 2016
November 1, 2016
3 months
November 29, 2016
December 2, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Physical activity enjoyment score (PACES)
This is an 18-item categorical survey used to assess participants' enjoyment of the bout of physical activity that was just completed
This was measured 10 min post-exercise in all participants during the 3 mo of data collection.
Oxygen uptake
Oxygen uptake (VO2) represents mitochondrial consumption of oxygen to drive cellular metabolism generating ATP to support muscular contraction.
Measured continuously during exercise during the 3 mo of data collection.
Study Arms (1)
Active men and women
Healthy, active men and women ages 18-45 yr completed 1 bout of high intensity interval training and moderate intensity continuous training in a randomized, crossover design.
Interventions
Participants were randomized to 1 or 2 exercise intensities, moderate or high (interval training).
Eligibility Criteria
Habitually active young men and women ages 18-45 yr
You may qualify if:
- Habitually active, healthy, non-obese
You may not qualify if:
- Sedentary, unhealthy, joint pain precluding tolerance to exercise
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Thum JS, Parsons G, Whittle T, Astorino TA. High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0166299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166299. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28076352DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CROSSOVER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Dept. of Kinesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2016
First Posted
December 5, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 5, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data are accepted for publication in PLoS One, an open-access journal, which makes the aggregate data available to all researchers.