Using Nasal Broadband Glasses in the Initial Management of Severe Bronchiolitis in Infants Admitted in ICU
HFNC
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of nasal broadband glasses HFNC (High Flow Nasal Cannula) in the initial management of severe bronchiolitis in infants admitted in ICU. Nasal HFNC can deliver warmed humidified gas through a nasal interface, greatly improving the safety and efficacy of administering O2. This device generates a continuous positive pressure in the airways, to reduce the work of breathing. The sealing absence of the HFNC at the nasal interface improves patient comfort and avoiding nasal trauma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2013
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2016
CompletedAugust 1, 2019
June 1, 2016
1 year
June 1, 2016
July 29, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of early success for the number of bronchiolitis who once admitted in the ICU and placed HFNC will not need another support ventilation mode after one hour of treatment (H1)
the number of children who once set HFNC at baseline Hour 0 will not need another breathing assistance technique After 1 hour H1 of treatment
after one hour of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Overall success rate
Comparison between baseline Hour 0 and after 1 hour of treatment
Demographic predictive factors of failure of HFNC
At baseline hour 0
Clinical predictive factors of failure of HFNC
At baseline hour 0
The child's comfort HFNC
comparison to Hour 0, Hour 1, Hour 12
Incidence of adverse events in HFNC
From baseline hour 0 to the end of hospitalization
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
High Flow Nasal Cannula
OTHERUse of High Flow Nasal Cannula
Interventions
Evaluation of the use of High Flow Nasal Cannula by biological markers, questionary of quality of use of HFNC by the physician, questionary of evaluation of adverse events with HFNC
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- In which the diagnosis of bronchiolitis is strongly suspected (1st or nth episode). Acute bronchiolitis is defined by the presence of respiratory distress (wheezing, crackles auscultatory, wrestling signs) or apnea can not be explained by another existing pathology in children with a clinical history of upper respiratory infection.
- Satisfactory at least 1 of the following severity criteria:
- EN\> 50 quiet,
- Trouble consciousness / hypotonia,
- Significant Apnea (with desaturation and / or bradycardia)
- Hypercapnic acidosis (pH \<7.3 and carbon dioxide partial pressure (PCO2)\> 55mmHg)
- Oxygen saturation (SpO2) \<92% on room air
- Including the holders of parental authority / legal representative are informed of the study and expressed no opposition to the participation of their child.
- Affiliated with a social security scheme by one of the holders of parental authority / legal guardian
You may not qualify if:
- Children with neuromuscular disease known heart or lung (even without decompensation) at the time of admission.
- Any vital distress, including respiratory or neurological justifying intubation or other emergency resuscitation gesture.
- Opposition to a parent / guardian to the participation of their children in the study.
- Desire to study withdrawal expressed by one of the holders of parental authority / legal guardian
- Voluntary or involuntary break current care protocol or research by the healthcare team.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fondation Lenvallead
Study Sites (2)
Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve - CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, 34295, France
Fondation LENVAL - Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL
Nice, 06200, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mickael AFANETTI, MD
Fondation LENVAL - Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2016
First Posted
June 7, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 1, 2019
Record last verified: 2016-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share