NCT02791711

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of nasal broadband glasses HFNC (High Flow Nasal Cannula) in the initial management of severe bronchiolitis in infants admitted in ICU. Nasal HFNC can deliver warmed humidified gas through a nasal interface, greatly improving the safety and efficacy of administering O2. This device generates a continuous positive pressure in the airways, to reduce the work of breathing. The sealing absence of the HFNC at the nasal interface improves patient comfort and avoiding nasal trauma.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
33

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2013

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2013

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 1, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 7, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2019

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

June 1, 2016

Last Update Submit

July 29, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

BronchiolitisContinuous Positive Airway PressureHFNC

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of early success for the number of bronchiolitis who once admitted in the ICU and placed HFNC will not need another support ventilation mode after one hour of treatment (H1)

    the number of children who once set HFNC at baseline Hour 0 will not need another breathing assistance technique After 1 hour H1 of treatment

    after one hour of treatment

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Overall success rate

    Comparison between baseline Hour 0 and after 1 hour of treatment

  • Demographic predictive factors of failure of HFNC

    At baseline hour 0

  • Clinical predictive factors of failure of HFNC

    At baseline hour 0

  • The child's comfort HFNC

    comparison to Hour 0, Hour 1, Hour 12

  • Incidence of adverse events in HFNC

    From baseline hour 0 to the end of hospitalization

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

High Flow Nasal Cannula

OTHER

Use of High Flow Nasal Cannula

Other: High Flow Nasal Cannula

Interventions

Evaluation of the use of High Flow Nasal Cannula by biological markers, questionary of quality of use of HFNC by the physician, questionary of evaluation of adverse events with HFNC

High Flow Nasal Cannula

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 1 Year
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • In which the diagnosis of bronchiolitis is strongly suspected (1st or nth episode). Acute bronchiolitis is defined by the presence of respiratory distress (wheezing, crackles auscultatory, wrestling signs) or apnea can not be explained by another existing pathology in children with a clinical history of upper respiratory infection.
  • Satisfactory at least 1 of the following severity criteria:
  • EN\> 50 quiet,
  • Trouble consciousness / hypotonia,
  • Significant Apnea (with desaturation and / or bradycardia)
  • Hypercapnic acidosis (pH \<7.3 and carbon dioxide partial pressure (PCO2)\> 55mmHg)
  • Oxygen saturation (SpO2) \<92% on room air
  • Including the holders of parental authority / legal representative are informed of the study and expressed no opposition to the participation of their child.
  • Affiliated with a social security scheme by one of the holders of parental authority / legal guardian

You may not qualify if:

  • Children with neuromuscular disease known heart or lung (even without decompensation) at the time of admission.
  • Any vital distress, including respiratory or neurological justifying intubation or other emergency resuscitation gesture.
  • Opposition to a parent / guardian to the participation of their children in the study.
  • Desire to study withdrawal expressed by one of the holders of parental authority / legal guardian
  • Voluntary or involuntary break current care protocol or research by the healthcare team.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve - CHU de Montpellier

Montpellier, 34295, France

Location

Fondation LENVAL - Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL

Nice, 06200, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bronchiolitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BronchitisRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsBronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung Diseases

Study Officials

  • Mickael AFANETTI, MD

    Fondation LENVAL - Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2016

First Posted

June 7, 2016

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

August 1, 2019

Record last verified: 2016-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations