Study Stopped
The study was stopped due to low enrollment.
Comparing Nasal Suction Devices in Children With Bronchiolitis: A Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of our study is to determine the safety, efficacy, length of stay and parental satisfaction of the NoseFrida in comparison to a suction device used in the hospital setting in patients with bronchiolitis admitted under observation status.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 14, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 18, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 3, 2020
CompletedSeptember 3, 2020
September 1, 2020
4.7 years
August 14, 2014
May 21, 2020
September 1, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of Median Length of Stay of the Two Devices in Hours
The study group will analyze the length of stay for the NoseFrida group and compare it with the NeoSucker group.
Participants will be followed for the duration of their stay in the EDOU, up to 48 Hours or end of hospitalization whichever is greater
Other Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Patients Readmitted Within 48 Hours of Discharge.
within 48 hours of discharge
Parental Satisfaction (NoseFrida Group) Will be Measured Using a Newly Developed Survey Tool (Likert Scale).
Participants will be followed for the duration of their stay in the EDOU, up to 48 Hours or end of hospitalization whichever is greater
Study Arms (2)
NoseFrida
EXPERIMENTALIf randomized to the NoseFrida group, the NoseFrida/filters will be given along with educational instruction of its use to the parents of patients admitted with bronchiolitis. The NoseFrida will be used by the parent to suction the nares of their infants/toddlers.
NeoSucker
NO INTERVENTIONThe NeoSucker (used for nasal suctioning) is part of the current standard of care for patients with bronchiolitis. The NeoSucker is used for removing nasal secretions by a nurse or respiratory therapist. The NeoSucker is a plastic tube which is used to suction the secretions. The bedside nurse will continue to use the NeoSucker as needed. NoseFrida will not be used for this sub group of patients.
Interventions
The NoseFrida has four components, the collection container, an interchangeable filter, flexible tubing and a mouth piece. The end of the collection devise is placed on the patient's nostril, a tight seal is made via the vacuum created from suctioning of the mouth piece and secretions are easily aspirated. This device disassembles for quick disinfecting and cleaning.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients above the age of 2 months and post-gestational age to 44 weeks and less than or equal to 2 years with signs and symptoms of bronchiolitis
- clinical respiratory score (CRS) of less than or equal to 4
- principle diagnosis of bronchiolitis (International Classification of Diseases-9: 466, 466.11 and 466.19)
- Patient admitted to the Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine (PHM) group
- Patient with associated hypoxemia and/or respiratory distress requiring low flow O2 nasal cannula (NC) management (2L/min or less)
You may not qualify if:
- age less than 2 months
- age less than post-gestational age 44 weeks
- CRS greater than 4
- associated hypoxia
- already using NoseFrida at home
- chronic lung disease
- oro-facial abnormalities
- cardiac abnormalities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (13)
Benincaso FV, Smith MH. A suction-controlled nasal aspirator for collection of nasopharyngeal secretions. J Pediatr. 1973 Feb;82(2):297-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(73)80175-1. No abstract available.
PMID: 4684375BACKGROUNDBudhiraja, S., Verma, R., Shields, M.D. (2012). The management of acute bronchiolitis in infants. Paidiatrics and Child Health, 23(7), 296-300.
BACKGROUNDCasati M, Picca M, Marinello R, Quartarone G. Safety of use, efficacy and degree of parental satisfaction with the nasal aspirator Narhinel in the treatment of nasal congestion in babies. Minerva Pediatr. 2007 Aug;59(4):315-25.
PMID: 17947838BACKGROUNDDa Dalt L, Bressan S, Martinolli F, Perilongo G, Baraldi E. Treatment of bronchiolitis: state of the art. Early Hum Dev. 2013 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S31-6. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3782(13)70011-2.
PMID: 23809346BACKGROUNDDeshpande SA, Northern V. The clinical and health economic burden of respiratory syncytial virus disease among children under 2 years of age in a defined geographical area. Arch Dis Child. 2003 Dec;88(12):1065-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.12.1065.
PMID: 14670770BACKGROUNDDiagnosis and Managment of Bronchiolitis., 2006. Subcommittee on Diagnosis and Management of Bronchiolitis. 118, 1774.
BACKGROUNDHall CB, Weinberg GA, Iwane MK, Blumkin AK, Edwards KM, Staat MA, Auinger P, Griffin MR, Poehling KA, Erdman D, Grijalva CG, Zhu Y, Szilagyi P. The burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children. N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 5;360(6):588-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804877.
PMID: 19196675BACKGROUNDJarvis K, Pirvu D, Barbee K, Berg N, Meyer M, Gaulke L, Pate BM, Roberts C. Change to a standardized airway clearance protocol for children with bronchiolitis leads to improved care. J Pediatr Nurs. 2014 May-Jun;29(3):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
PMID: 24333327BACKGROUNDMoore T. Suctioning techniques for the removal of respiratory secretions. Nurs Stand. 2003 Nov 12-18;18(9):47-53; quiz 54-5. doi: 10.7748/ns2003.11.18.9.47.c3504.
PMID: 14649194BACKGROUNDMussman GM, Parker MW, Statile A, Sucharew H, Brady PW. Suctioning and length of stay in infants hospitalized with bronchiolitis. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 May;167(5):414-21. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.36.
PMID: 23460088BACKGROUNDNagakumar P, Doull I. Current therapy for bronchiolitis. Arch Dis Child. 2012 Sep;97(9):827-30. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301579. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
PMID: 22734014BACKGROUNDSandweiss DR, Corneli HM, Kadish HA. Barriers to discharge from a 24-hour observation unit for children with bronchiolitis. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Dec;26(12):892-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181fe911d.
PMID: 21088635BACKGROUNDWai AK, Kwok WO, Chan MS, Graham CA, Rainer TH. Patients' perceptions of nasopharyngeal aspiration in the emergency department of a teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Emerg Med J. 2007 Jan;24(1):35-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.039701.
PMID: 17183041BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The sample size was small and was a convenience sample. Not all parents participated in the satisfaction survey. The lack of documentation of nose bleeds and nasal swelling does not suggest the absence of these minor side effects.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Shabana Yusuf/Associate Professor of Pediatrics
- Organization
- Baylor College of Medicine
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Elizabeth L Watson, MSN, RN, CNL
Baylor College of Medicine
- STUDY CHAIR
Aderonke Adekunle-Ojo, MD
Baylor College of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 14, 2014
First Posted
August 18, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2019
Study Completion
May 1, 2019
Last Updated
September 3, 2020
Results First Posted
September 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share