Interest of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) Versus Non Invasive Ventilation During the Initial Management of Severe Bronchiolitis in Infants
TRAMONTANE
1 other identifier
interventional
142
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- 1.The purpose of the study is to evaluate prospectively the clinical benefits of High flow nasal canula (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) versus nasal CPAP( continuous positive airway pressure) (n-CPAP: 7 cmH2O) in the initial management of bronchiolitis in infants.
- 2.Design: non-inferiority study, prospective, controlled, randomized, multi-center.
- 3.Design: Infants less than 6 month admitted in pediatric intensive care unit for respiratory distress (mWCAS \>3) secondary to bronchiolitis but not requiring mechanical ventilation will be randomized in two groups: "n-CPAP"(nasal continuous positive airway pressure) or "HFNC" during 24 hours.
- 4.Conditions of measurements:
- 5.Statistic: Intention to treat Analysis. Expected number of patients: 71 per arm: 142 children.
- 6.Study Schedule: October 2014-April 2016
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedMay 29, 2015
May 1, 2015
1.5 years
January 27, 2015
May 26, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of failure
Proportion of failure in both arms during the first 24 hours. A raise of the Clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) (1 point) or respiratory rate (10/min /H0 and above 60/min) or discomfort (EDIN) (1point /H0 and above 4) or apnea.
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (12)
number of participants with an aggravation of the clinical score for respiratory distress arms
1hour
number of participants with an aggravation of the clinical score for respiratory distress arms
12hours
number of participants with an increase of the clinical score for respiratory distress arms
1 hour
Comparison of the Report Sp02/Fi02 in both arms
1 hour
Comparison of the Report Sp02/Fi02 in both arms
12 hours
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
HFNC treatment
EXPERIMENTALHFNC : High flow nasal canula 24hours Patients will be treated by a High flow nasal canula (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) for the initial management of their bronchiolitis (24 hours)
nCPAP treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORnCPAP : nasal NCPAP Patients will be treated by a nasal CPAP (n-CPAP: 7 cmH2O) for the initial management of their bronchiolitis (24 hours)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age\<6months
- bronchiolitis
- mWCAS \> or=3
- hospitalisation in pediatric intensive care unit
- signed consent form (2 parents)
You may not qualify if:
- Intubated patient
- Neurological or cardiac disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital of Montpellier
Montpellier, 34395, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2015
First Posted
May 29, 2015
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 29, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05