Patient-Centred Innovations for Persons With Multimorbidity - Quebec
PACEinMM-QC
1 other identifier
interventional
284
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The aim of Patient-Centred Innovations for Persons With Multimorbidity (PACE in MM) study is to reorient the health care system from a single disease focus to a multimorbidity focus; centre on not only disease but also the patient in context; and realign the health care system from separate silos to coordinated collaborations in care. PACE in MM will propose multifaceted innovations in Chronic Disease Prevention and Management (CDPM) that will be grounded in current realities (i.e. Chronic Care Models including Self-Management Programs), that are linked to Primary Care (PC) reform efforts. The study will build on this firm foundation, will design and test promising innovations and will achieve transformation by creating structures to sustain relationships among researchers, decision-makers, practitioners, and patients. The Team will conduct inter-jurisdictional comparisons and is mainly a Quebec (QC) - Ontario (ON) collaboration with participation from 3 other provinces: British Columbia (BC); Manitoba (MB); and Nova Scotia (NS). The Team's objectives are: 1) to identify factors responsible for success or failure of current CDPM programs linked to the PC reform, by conducting a realist synthesis of their quantitative and qualitative evaluations; 2) to transform consenting CDPM programs identified in Objective 1, by aligning them to promising interventions on patient-centred care for multimorbidity patients, and to test these new innovations' in at least two jurisdictions and compare among jurisdictions; and 3) to foster the scaling-up of innovations informed by Objective 1 and tested/proven in Objective 2, and to conduct research on different approaches to scaling-up. This registration for Clinical Trials only pertains to Objective 2 of the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable hypertension
Started Apr 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable hypertension
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2022
CompletedNovember 3, 2022
November 1, 2022
6.5 years
March 16, 2016
November 2, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Self-Management outcomes
Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HeiQ). Score: Reliable improvement
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Chronic Diseases
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Health Status
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Quality of Life
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Psychological Well-being
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Lifestyle/Health Behaviours
T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2; T4: one year after T3
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Group A
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention group (n = 163) Intervention: Participates in DIMAC02 Program
Group B
NO INTERVENTIONControl group (n = 163)
Group C
NO INTERVENTIONHealth Administrative Data Group (n = 1630) Number of matched data controls. Not taking part in intervention.
Interventions
Integrated Approach For Chronic Diseases (DIMAC02) is an integrated approach for chronic disease prevention and management services that aims to improve and coordinate different regional initiatives in 11 Family Medicine Groups(FMG) related to : Self-management, Case management, Patient-centred care for persons with multimorbidity, Motivational approach, Interprofessional collaboration. DIMAC 02 specific objectives are: 1) To make available, in FMG's, an interdisciplinary educational intervention for prevention and management of chronic diseases for patients with low and high risk for complication. 2) To Increase the flow of communications between FMG and hospital facilities to improve continuity of care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- + Chronic Conditions
- to 80 years of age
- Eligible for DIMAC02 intervention
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to reasonably respond to questionnaires or provide informed consent (ie. cognitive impairment or language barrier)
- Deemed by provider to be too fragile
- CAREGIVERS (Study 2.1):
- Close family member (wife/husband, parent, son/daughter, brother/sister) and/or caregiver to a patient that has received DIMAC02 intervention (first component)
- Sharing time with the patient (before, during and after the intervention)
- French speaking
- DECISION-MAKERS (Study 2.1):
- FMG Physician-Manager, FMG Coordinators, Decision-Makers/Managers
- Involved/Familiar with DIMAC02 program
- DIMAC02 INTERDISCIPLINARY team (Study 2.1):
- Nurse, Nutritionist, Kinesiologist, Social Worker, Psychologist
- Has delivered DIMAC02 intervention to at least one patient
- REFERRAL PROFESSIONALS (Study 2.1):
- \- Family physician or nurse/nurse practitioner
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Université de Sherbrooke
Chicoutimi, Quebec, G7H 5H6, Canada
CIUSSS du Sageunay-Lac-Saint-Jean
Chicoutimi, Quebec, G7H 7K9, Canada
Related Publications (22)
Best A, Greenhalgh T, Lewis S, Saul JE, Carroll S, Bitz J. Large-system transformation in health care: a realist review. Milbank Q. 2012 Sep;90(3):421-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00670.x.
PMID: 22985277BACKGROUNDPawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage, 1997
BACKGROUNDPatton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication. 2002
BACKGROUNDCrabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc. 1999.
BACKGROUNDMoher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Group. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):e1-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
PMID: 20346624BACKGROUNDPoitras ME, Fortin M, Hudon C, Haggerty J, Almirall J. Validation of the disease burden morbidity assessment by self-report in a French-speaking population. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb 14;12:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-35.
PMID: 22333434BACKGROUNDStewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, McWhinney IR, Oates J, Weston WW, Jordan J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000 Sep;49(9):796-804.
PMID: 11032203BACKGROUNDStewart M, Brown JB, Hammerton J, Donner A, Gavin A, Holliday RL, Whelan T, Leslie K, Cohen I, Weston W, Freeman T. Improving communication between doctors and breast cancer patients. Ann Fam Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;5(5):387-94. doi: 10.1370/afm.721.
PMID: 17893379BACKGROUNDStewart M, et al., The patient perception of patient-centeredness questionnaire (PPPC). Working Paper Series #04-1, April 2004.
BACKGROUNDColeman EA, Mahoney E, Parry C. Assessing the quality of preparation for posthospital care from the patient's perspective: the care transitions measure. Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):246-55. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00007.
PMID: 15725981BACKGROUNDNolte S, Elsworth GR, Sinclair AJ, Osborne RH. The extent and breadth of benefits from participating in chronic disease self-management courses: a national patient-reported outcomes survey. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):351-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.016. Epub 2006 Oct 5.
PMID: 17027221BACKGROUNDSherer M., et al., The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports. 51: p. 663-671,1982.
BACKGROUNDRasanen P, Roine E, Sintonen H, Semberg-Konttinen V, Ryynanen OP, Roine R. Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: A systematic literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Spring;22(2):235-41. doi: 10.1017/S0266462306051051.
PMID: 16571199BACKGROUNDKessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, Epstein JF, Gfroerer JC, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Normand SL, Manderscheid RW, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184.
PMID: 12578436BACKGROUNDCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. 2007, Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
BACKGROUNDVan Breukelen GJ. ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected]. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Sep;59(9):920-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.007. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
PMID: 16895814BACKGROUNDDaniel, W.W., Biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 9th ed. Hoboken. NJ: Wiley. 2009.
BACKGROUNDCanadian Institute for Health Information. Canadian Hospital Reporting Project (CHRP). 2012; https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/HI2013_Jan30_EN.pdf . Accessed 2016 March 14.
BACKGROUNDWodchis, WP, et al., Guidelines on Person-Level Costing Using Administrative Databases in Ontario. Toronto: Health System Performance Research Network, 2011.
BACKGROUNDDrummond, MF, et al., Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
BACKGROUNDNgangue P, Brown JB, Forgues C, Ag Ahmed MA, Nguyen TN, Sasseville M, Loignon C, Gallagher F, Stewart M, Fortin M. Evaluating the implementation of interdisciplinary patient-centred care intervention for people with multimorbidity in primary care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 24;11(9):e046914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046914.
PMID: 34561255DERIVEDStewart M, Fortin M; Patient-Centred Innovations for Persons with Multimorbidity Team*. Patient-Centred Innovations for Persons with Multimorbidity: funded evaluation protocol. CMAJ Open. 2017 May 9;5(2):E365-E372. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160097.
PMID: 28487349DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martin Fortin, MD, M.Sc
Université de Sherbrooke
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2016
First Posted
June 3, 2016
Study Start
April 22, 2016
Primary Completion
November 1, 2022
Study Completion
November 1, 2022
Last Updated
November 3, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share