Brain Stimulation and Tailored Interventions to Promote Recovery in Stroke Survivors
Combining Neurostimulation Technique With Tailored Interventions for the Affected Upper Extremity: Can it Promote Better Recovery in Stroke Survivors?
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
3
Brief Summary
A substantial proportion of individuals are left with poor residual functioning of the affected arm after a stroke. This has a tremendous impact on the quality of life and the ability for stroke survivors to live independently. While exercise is considered essential to any rehabilitation program, its benefits are generally far from optimal because of the lack of proper dosing in terms of intensity. One way to tackle this problem is to develop better tools that could predict an individual's potential and then adjust the intensity of exercise accordingly. One such predicting tool exists and consists of using non-invasive brain stimulation such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), to assess the integrity of descending motor pathways originating from the brain. TMS consists of applying a magnetic wand near the scalp to stimulate brain cells without inducing pain or discomfort. One goal of the current proposal is to use TMS to test the integrity of the motor pathway in chronic stroke survivors. The level of responses to TMS will be used to classify participants in terms of potential for recovery and then, to determine the optimal level of exercise. The study will also examine the effect of another non-invasive brain stimulation technique called transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation-tDCS to determine whether it can enhance the response to strength training exercise in the affected arm. Half of the participants will be trained with the tDCS on, while the other half will be trained with the stimulator off. The training program will last 4 weeks; 3X/week. Both clinical and neurophysiological measures will be performed to determine the impact of the strength training intervention on participants. Overall, the proposed project is expected to have a positive and significant impact on stroke survivors' quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke
Started Apr 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 28, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2022
CompletedApril 27, 2022
April 1, 2022
2.8 years
September 21, 2016
April 26, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Fugl-Meyer Stroke Assessment Scale
baseline and in the week after completion of the training program
Change in peak-to-peak motor evoked potential amplitude and motor threshold elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation
baseline and in the week after completion of the training program
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in grip strength
baseline and in the week after completion of the training program
Change in Box and Block test
baseline and in the week after completion of the training program
Change in Motor Activity Log
baseline and in the week after completion of the training program
Study Arms (2)
strength training intervention
EXPERIMENTALStrength training of the affected upper limb in chronic stroke survivors
direct-current brain stimulation (tDCS)
EXPERIMENTALtDCS real of sham will be applied during each session of the strength training intervention
Interventions
The strength training program will last 4 weeks (3 times/week, 60 minutes). Using dead weights, the 1RM (i.e. the maximal load that an individual can lift once) will be estimated by the 10RM in order to avoid tendino-muscular injuries and fatigue. The 10RM will be determined for the muscles playing a key role in the functional performance of the upper limb, which are the wrist extensors and the elbow and shoulder flexors. In addition, the grip muscles of the affected hand will be trained with a JAMAR® dynamometer. Participants' maximal grip force will be determined and used to dose the training of the hand muscles and its progression. The training will begin and end by a 5-minute warm-up and relaxation period comprising of active movements of the trained muscles.
An anodal montage over the ipsilesional hemisphere will be used where the anode will be placed over the ipsilesional M1 area whereas the cathode will be placed on the contralateral supra-orbital region.For the tDCS real group, a direct current will be generated by a tDCS stimulator and gradually increased in a ramp-like fashion over the first 8 seconds until a maximum intensity of 2 mA is achieved. The tDCS will be applied for 20 minutes during each training session for a total of 12 sessions. For the group receiving sham tDCS, the protocol will be similar to the tDCS real group although the stimulation will be applied for the first 30 seconds only; a duration long enough to induce similar perceived sensation as real tDCS (tingling), to keep participants' blind to the tDCS type.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- have had solely one supratentorial stroke
- be in a chronic stroke phase (\>6 months)
You may not qualify if:
- a significant spasticity at the affected upper limb (score \> 3 on the modified Ashworth scale);
- a significant pain intensity at the affected upper limb (≥ 4/10 on the Visual Analog Pain Scale);
- a major sensory deficit (a score ≤ 25/34 on the Nottingham Sensory Assessment);
- a presence of hemineglect (\> 70% of unshaded lines on the same side as the motor deficit on the Line Cancellation Test);
- an apraxia (score \>2.5 on the Alexander Test);
- the presence of a neurological disorder other than a stroke;
- concomitant orthopaedic problems at the affected upper limb and
- any contraindication to TMS and/or tDCS.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Université de Sherbrookelead
- Brain Canadacollaborator
- Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québeccollaborator
- Fondation Vitaecollaborator
- Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Socialecollaborator
- Jewish Rehabilitation Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Bruyère Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 5C8, Canada
CRIR/Feil/Oberfeld Research Center; Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Laval; Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital
Laval, Quebec, H7V 1R2, Canada
Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H4C4, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Palimeris S, Ansari Y, Remaud A, Tremblay F, Corriveau H, Boudrias MH, Milot MH. Effect of a tailored upper extremity strength training intervention combined with direct current stimulation in chronic stroke survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Aug 3;3:978257. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.978257. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36189037DERIVEDMilot MH, Palimeris S, Corriveau H, Tremblay F, Boudrias MH. Effects of a tailored strength training program of the upper limb combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in chronic stroke patients: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2019 May 24;11:8. doi: 10.1186/s13102-019-0120-1. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31139420DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marie-Helene Milot, PhD
Université de Sherbrooke
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2016
First Posted
September 26, 2016
Study Start
April 28, 2017
Primary Completion
February 28, 2020
Study Completion
January 31, 2022
Last Updated
April 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The investigators are not planning on sharing individual data to the participants