NCT02742597

Brief Summary

The aim of Patient-Centred Innovations for Persons With Multimorbidity (PACE in MM) study is to reorient the health care system from a single disease focus to a multimorbidity focus; centre on not only disease but also the patient in context; and realign the health care system from separate silos to coordinated collaborations in care. PACE in MM will propose multifaceted innovations in Chronic Disease Prevention and Management (CDPM) that will be grounded in current realities (i.e. Chronic Care Models including Self-Management Programs), that are linked to Primary Care (PC) reform efforts. The study will build on this firm foundation, will design and test promising innovations and will achieve transformation by creating structures to sustain relationships among researchers, decision-makers, practitioners, and patients. The Team will conduct inter-jurisdictional comparisons and is mainly a Quebec (QC) - Ontario (ON) collaboration with participation from 4 other provinces: British Columbia (BC); Manitoba (MB); Nova Scotia (NS); and New Brunswick (NB). The Team's objectives are: 1) to identify factors responsible for success or failure of current CDPM programs linked to the PC reform, by conducting a realist synthesis of their quantitative and qualitative evaluations; 2) to transform consenting CDPM programs identified in Objective 1, by aligning them to promising interventions on patient-centred care for multimorbidity patients, and to test these new innovations' in at least two jurisdictions and compare among jurisdictions; and 3) to foster the scaling-up of innovations informed by Objective 1 and tested/proven in Objective 2, and to conduct research on different approaches to scaling-up. This registration for Clinical Trials only pertains to Objective 2 of the study.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
175

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable hypertension

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable hypertension

Geographic Reach
1 country

9 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 12, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 21, 2016

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 19, 2016

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 7, 2019

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 19, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 17, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

March 21, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 16, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Self-Management outcomes

    Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HeiQ). Score: Reliable improvement

    T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2;

  • Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Transitions of Care

    Patient Perception of Transitions of Care. Score: Mean

    T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2;

  • Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Self-Efficacy

    Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease Scale (SEM-CD). Score: Mean

    T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2;

  • Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Patient-Centredness

    Patient Perception of Patient-Centredness (PPPC). Score: Mean

    T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2;

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Chronic Diseases

    T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2;

  • Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Health Status

    T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2;

  • Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Quality of Life

    T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2;

  • Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Psychological Well-being

    T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2;

  • Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness - Change in Lifestyle/Health Behaviours

    T1: Initial evaluation; T2: after 4 months; T3: one year after T2;

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Group A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intervention group (n = 86) Intervention: Participates in Telemedicine Impact Plus (TIP)/ IMPACT Plus Care Coordination meeting

Behavioral: TIP / IMPACT Plus Care Coordination

Group B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Before/After Intervention group (n = 10) Intervention: Participates in TIP / IMPACT Plus Care Coordination meeting

Behavioral: TIP / IMPACT Plus Care Coordination

Group C

NO INTERVENTION

Control group (n = 77)

Group D

NO INTERVENTION

Health Administrative Data Group (n = 430) Number of matched data controls. Not taking part in intervention.

Interventions

The intervention will involve the patient attending an interdisciplinary team meeting, either through the Ontario Telemedicine Network's teleconferencing technology or in person, along with their caregiver(s), the referring practitioner, inter-professional (IP) teams and home care coordinators to discuss and uncover the patient's condition covering a diverse range of medical, functional and psycho-social issues and the development of a patient-centred treatment plan. The care plans are documented, shared, implemented and monitored by an assigned nurse from the program.

Group AGroup B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • + Chronic Conditions
  • to 80 years of age
  • Eligible for TIP/IMPACT Plus program
  • Must live in catchment area for TIP/IMPACT Plus program (Toronto, Ontario, Canada)

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to reasonably respond to questionnaires or provide informed consent (ie. cognitive impairment or language barrier)
  • Deemed by provider to be too fragile
  • For Qualitative (Study 2.1):
  • Decision Makers: Responsible for policy and financial decisions related to the TIP / IMPACT Plus program
  • TIP / IMPACT Providers: Providers that have delivered the TIP / IMPACT Plus intervention to at least one patient, including pharmacist, nurse, nurse practitioner, physiotherapist, social worker, dietitian, occupational therapist, personal care worker / home care coordinator
  • Family Physicians / Specialists: Those that take part in the TIP / IMPACT Plus intervention, including internist, psychiatrist, and family physician
  • Family and Caregivers: Need to be a family member or caregiver of a TIP / IMPACT Plus patient that has received the intervention a minimum of 4 months prior to the qualitative interview.
  • Referral Provider: Emergency Department doctor, nurse practitioner, CCAC coordinator or representative community family doctor that has referred patients to the TIP / IMPACT Plus program.
  • Decision Makers that are not knowledgeable about or involved with the TIP / IMPACT Plus program
  • Providers/Family Physicians/Specialists that have not ever referred to or taken part in a TIP / IMPACT Plus intervention or have not been active with the program in the last year
  • Family and Caregivers of Patients or Patients themselves that haven't yet received the TIP / IMPACT Plus intervention or those that received the intervention within the last 4 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (9)

Western University

London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada

Location

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Providence Healthcare

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Toronto Central Community Care Access Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Toronto East General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

University Hospital Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Women's College Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Best A, Greenhalgh T, Lewis S, Saul JE, Carroll S, Bitz J. Large-system transformation in health care: a realist review. Milbank Q. 2012 Sep;90(3):421-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00670.x.

    PMID: 22985277BACKGROUND
  • Pawson, R. and N. Tilley, Realistic evaluation. London: Sage Publications Inc., 1997.

    BACKGROUND
  • Patton, M.Q., Qualitative Research & Evaluation. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 2002.

    BACKGROUND
  • Crabtree, B.F. and W.L. Miller, Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 1999.

    BACKGROUND
  • Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Group. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):e1-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Mar 25.

    PMID: 20346624BACKGROUND
  • Poitras ME, Fortin M, Hudon C, Haggerty J, Almirall J. Validation of the disease burden morbidity assessment by self-report in a French-speaking population. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb 14;12:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-35.

    PMID: 22333434BACKGROUND
  • Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, McWhinney IR, Oates J, Weston WW, Jordan J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000 Sep;49(9):796-804.

    PMID: 11032203BACKGROUND
  • Stewart M, Brown JB, Hammerton J, Donner A, Gavin A, Holliday RL, Whelan T, Leslie K, Cohen I, Weston W, Freeman T. Improving communication between doctors and breast cancer patients. Ann Fam Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;5(5):387-94. doi: 10.1370/afm.721.

    PMID: 17893379BACKGROUND
  • Stewart, M., et al., The patient perception of patient-centeredness questionnaire (PPPC). Working Paper Series #04-1, April 2004.

    BACKGROUND
  • Coleman EA, Mahoney E, Parry C. Assessing the quality of preparation for posthospital care from the patient's perspective: the care transitions measure. Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):246-55. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00007.

    PMID: 15725981BACKGROUND
  • Nolte S, Elsworth GR, Sinclair AJ, Osborne RH. The extent and breadth of benefits from participating in chronic disease self-management courses: a national patient-reported outcomes survey. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):351-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.016. Epub 2006 Oct 5.

    PMID: 17027221BACKGROUND
  • Sherer, M., et al., The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports. 51: p. 663-671, 1982.

    BACKGROUND
  • Rasanen P, Roine E, Sintonen H, Semberg-Konttinen V, Ryynanen OP, Roine R. Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: A systematic literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Spring;22(2):235-41. doi: 10.1017/S0266462306051051.

    PMID: 16571199BACKGROUND
  • Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, Epstein JF, Gfroerer JC, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Normand SL, Manderscheid RW, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184.

    PMID: 12578436BACKGROUND
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. 2007, Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    BACKGROUND
  • Van Breukelen GJ. ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected]. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Sep;59(9):920-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.007. Epub 2006 Jun 23.

    PMID: 16895814BACKGROUND
  • Daniel, W.W., Biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 9th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2009.

    BACKGROUND
  • Canadian Institute for Health Information. Canadian Hospital Reporting Project (CHRP). 2012; https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/HI2013_Jan30_EN.pdf . Accessed March 14, 2016.

    BACKGROUND
  • Wodchis, W.P., et al., Guidelines on Person-Level Costing Using Administrative Databases in Ontario. Toronto: Health System Performance Research Network, 2011.

    BACKGROUND
  • Drummond, M.F., et al., Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

    BACKGROUND
  • Stewart M, Fortin M; Patient-Centred Innovations for Persons with Multimorbidity Team*. Patient-Centred Innovations for Persons with Multimorbidity: funded evaluation protocol. CMAJ Open. 2017 May 9;5(2):E365-E372. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160097.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HypertensionDepressionAnxiety DisordersMusculoskeletal PainArthritisArthritis, RheumatoidOsteoporosisPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAsthmaBronchitis, ChronicCardiovascular DiseasesHeart FailureStrokeIschemic Attack, TransientUlcerGastroesophageal RefluxIrritable Bowel SyndromeCrohn DiseaseColitis, UlcerativeDiverticulumHepatitis, ChronicDiabetes MellitusThyroid DiseasesNeoplasmsKidney DiseasesDementiaAlzheimer DiseaseHyperlipidemias

Interventions

Lysine Acetyltransferase 5

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vascular DiseasesBehavioral SymptomsBehaviorMental DisordersMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsJoint DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesBone Diseases, MetabolicBone DiseasesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesBronchial DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityBronchitisRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsHeart DiseasesCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesBrain IschemiaEsophageal Motility DisordersDeglutition DisordersEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesColonic Diseases, FunctionalColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesInflammatory Bowel DiseasesGastroenteritisColitisDiverticular DiseasesPathological Conditions, AnatomicalHepatitisLiver DiseasesGlucose Metabolism DisordersEndocrine System DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersTauopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesDyslipidemiasLipid Metabolism Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Histone AcetyltransferasesLysine AcetyltransferasesAcetyltransferasesAcyltransferasesTransferasesEnzymesEnzymes and Coenzymes

Study Officials

  • Moira Stewart

    Western University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2016

First Posted

April 19, 2016

Study Start

January 12, 2016

Primary Completion

April 7, 2019

Study Completion

October 19, 2022

Last Updated

March 17, 2023

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified subsets of data will be transferred upon request to healthcare providers at collaborating institutions under separate ethics approvals as/if required. Any transfers will be conducted by secure file transfer between encrypted devices. Any health information transferred will be de-identified.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
Time Frame
Study Protocol: 2017 onward Clinical Study Report: 2020 onward
Access Criteria
The study protocol is available in a published paper (CMAJ Open 2017) Clinical Study Report: results published in British Journal of General Practice 2020

Locations