NCT02767388

Brief Summary

Broadly speaking, the goal of this study is to better understand the influence of chemotherapy treatment on the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying human behavior. Extant literature lacks diversity in studied cancer populations and treatment protocols, and provides limited understanding of the cognitive abilities that are impaired by chemotherapy. To overcome these limitations, this study will employ a sophisticated battery of tests on an understudied cancer population. Eligible participants will either be patients diagnosed with hematological malignancy (HM) or demographically matched healthy control patients. After HM diagnosis and treatment protocols have been established, patients will be inducted into the longitudinal study comprised of three visits: 1) after diagnosis but prior to chemotherapy treatment (baseline), 2) after one treatment cycle (one month post-baseline), and 3) after three treatment cycles (three months post-baseline). Patients will undergo a test battery designed to measure specific behavioral and neural mechanisms of attention; tests will either be computer-based cognitive tasks or simulated driving tests that immerse patients into virtual driving scenarios. During each test, EEG will be concurrently measured through non-invasive scalp electrophysiology recordings; EEG recordings will reveal underlying neural mechanisms affected by chemotherapy. Additionally, neuropsychological tests of vision, attention, and memory will be administered, as well as questionnaires to evaluate health, mobility, and life space. Finally, blood samples will be collected to examine levels of circulating inflammation-specific proteins typically present in cancer patients. This study will allow us to better understand the mechanisms through which chemotherapy influences cognitive performance. Results from this study will influence the administration of chemotherapy treatments so that patients can continue to receive the highest medical care while maintaining optimal cognitive abilities and quality of life.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2016

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 10, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2016

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 11, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 15, 2018

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 6, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 29, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

April 22, 2016

Results QC Date

June 12, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 21, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change From Baseline Capture Task Performance at 1- and 3- Months

    Response time - measured as the time required to respond to a target hidden among distractor items - is the primary outcome measure of the capture task. Proportional response time was calculated by subtracting mean response time in the neutral condition from response time in the capture condition, and dividing that number by the standard deviation of response time across conditions. Changes in proportional response time across study visits is reported. Positive values correspond to an increase in response time and negative values correspond to a decrease in response time.

    Collected at Study Induction, 1 month after Study Induction, 3 months after Study Induction

  • Change From Baseline N2pc Amplitude at 1- and 3- Months

    Electrophysiological component that measures allocation of attentional resources

    Collected at Study Induction, 1 month after Study Induction, 3 months after Study Induction

  • Change From Baseline Filter Task Performance at 1- and 3- Months

    Response accuracy - measured as the proportion of correct trials - is the primary outcome measure of the filter task. Changes in response accuracy were calculated by subtracting response accuracy at 1-month and 3-months from baseline response accuracy. Positive values correspond to an increase in accuracy and negative values correspond to a decline in accuracy.

    Collected at Study Induction, 1 month after Study Induction, 3 months after Study Induction

  • Change From Baseline CDA Amplitude at 1- and 3- Months

    Electrophysiological component that measures online storage load

    Collected at Study Induction, 1 month after Study Induction, 3 months after Study Induction

Study Arms (3)

HM - Chemotherapy

Study patients diagnosed with HM that are scheduled to receive chemotherapy treatment.

HM - No Chemotherapy

Study patients diagnosed with HM that are scheduled to receive non-chemotherapy treatment options.

Healthy Controls

Study participants that are demographically matched to HM study patients and meet all inclusion criteria

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification is used to diagnose MDS. Patients diagnosed with MDS are stratified into one of five risk categories, based on a prognostic score calculated according to the revised International Prognostics Scoring System (IPSS-R): very-low risk, low risk, intermediate risk, high risk, and very-high risk. IPSS-R scores are estimated from percent of bone marrow blasts, number and depth of cytopenias, and presence of specific cytogenetic abnormalities, collectively reflecting the total number of risk factors.

You may qualify if:

  • HM diagnosis
  • scheduled to receive treatment based on risk classification
  • between 19 to 80 years of age-
  • normal or corrected-to-normal vision
  • matched to HM patient demographics (healthy controls)

You may not qualify if:

  • non-HM non-cutaneous cancer diagnosis (patients with localized skin cancer may not be excluded)
  • prior radiation or chemotherapy treatment
  • HM cancer diagnosis (healthy controls)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, 68132, United States

Location

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

Blood serum

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myelodysplastic SyndromesCognitive DysfunctionMultiple MyelomaLymphoma, Non-HodgkinLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveLeukemia, Myeloid, Acute

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone Marrow DiseasesHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesCognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersNeoplasms, Plasma CellNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHemostatic DisordersVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesParaproteinemiasBlood Protein DisordersHemorrhagic DisordersLymphoproliferative DisordersImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System DiseasesLymphomaLymphatic DiseasesLeukemia, B-CellLeukemia, LymphoidLeukemiaChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsLeukemia, MyeloidMyeloproliferative Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
David Anderson
Organization
University of Nebraska Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Vijaya Bhatt, MD

    University of Nebraska

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2016

First Posted

May 10, 2016

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 11, 2017

Study Completion

March 15, 2018

Last Updated

September 29, 2023

Results First Posted

September 6, 2019

Record last verified: 2023-09

Locations